HOME | DD

glogauer — FARENHEIT 9/11

Published: 2005-02-21 15:30:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 6424; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 399
Redirect to original
Description I find these two men very funny, but one of them is REALLY MUCH MORE SYMPATHETIC AND COURAGEOUS than the other.

Do you know whom I'm talking about?


Thank you very much for those who comment, fav and support my cartoons. I don't always have the time to thank you individually, but be sure that I appreciate a lot!


Comments welcome.

If you are interested to take a look at other political cartoons I made about the Iraq war, here are the links on my blog ACE CARTOON PILOT (in order of realization) :

THE FANATICAL BARBARIANS
WAR PROPAGANDA
NEW U.S. CONGRESS MENU
U.S. « FRIENDLY » FIRE
TRIBUTE TO « HEROES » (01)
THE FREEDOM TEARS
BOMBING BAGHDAD
THE CYNICAL LIARS
THE MONICA « SOLUTION »
HOME SWEET HOME ALABAMA
NEW IRAQI POETRY
OUR FUNNY PRIME MINISTER!
TRIBUTE TO « HEROES » (02)
BRITISH ARMY COMPLAINT
NEW COLOURS FOR THE U.S. ARMY UNIFORMS
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE...
ABU GHRAIB JAIL HUMILIATIONS AND TORTURES
GOD BLESS AMERICA
THE CHOICE OF CARICATURISTS
THE « COMMANDER IN CHIEF »
THE « REPUBLICANATOR »
THE REAL ALMIGHTY « GOD »

And other cartoons that are worth the look :
HILLARIOUS CLINTON
BLACK, WHITE AND GREY
THE « RAËLITY » SHOW
« JOLIE » LIPS


May you have good laughs and a nice day!
Related content
Comments: 35

The-Conquerors [2014-09-11 03:55:39 +0000 UTC]

I find it highly ironic that Michael Moore complains about capitalism yet lives off a fortune and owns multi-million dollar mansions.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Messenger-Of-Chaos [2008-08-20 11:13:05 +0000 UTC]

ROTFLOL, very nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ritualist [2007-08-19 16:17:46 +0000 UTC]

Now that's something. I watched all the Mike's films and they just tell so much, better then any book or "expert" on TV. 'Awful truth' was very awesome, also, although i watched it few years later.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sentinalannhilator [2007-01-31 04:54:08 +0000 UTC]

what a fat loser.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CrazyDave55811 [2006-08-29 18:10:17 +0000 UTC]

It is kinda funny.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

titmouse711 [2005-06-01 04:28:50 +0000 UTC]

YOU LIKE "MEN"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Figured as much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

glogauer In reply to titmouse711 [2005-07-18 09:37:48 +0000 UTC]

The most childish comment I've ever seen on my cartoons!

Congrats!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

titmouse711 In reply to glogauer [2005-07-19 06:42:57 +0000 UTC]

I think by now most know what a queen you really are. Just look at your work!
It shows thru and thru. I never really noticed untill a friend pointed it out to me.
He's a queen like you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

madlynx [2005-03-15 15:11:14 +0000 UTC]

Moi j'aime les deux films et ton dessin aussi

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dugebag [2005-02-25 12:58:38 +0000 UTC]

moore is a pretty bad spindoctor but not as bad as bush is a liar. This image is kinda scary

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mobsta [2005-02-24 10:15:28 +0000 UTC]

Neszis I'm honored to be called a liberal. And I don't care weather you like Moore or not, this was a broad comment regarding your posts that Ive seen so far. It follows the same sort of theme "liberal bashing" or something similar. I don't think being conservative is the same as a "Sheep". You can be a conservative and be a free thinker, to be a "blind follower" in my opinion is the lowest of the lowest creatures in this world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

glogauer In reply to mobsta [2005-02-24 19:36:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your comments!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

glogauer In reply to mobsta [2005-02-24 19:35:40 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your comments!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mobsta [2005-02-22 07:56:47 +0000 UTC]

Neszis don't take this wrong, but you seem to be another Fox News viewer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Neszis In reply to mobsta [2005-02-23 00:54:38 +0000 UTC]

If by telling me not to take it wrong you mean don't get offended, that's a ridiculous buffer for being able to try to insult me. If you insulted me, I don't care what excuse you put before it, I'm going to "take it wrong."

So you respond to my criticisms by accusing me of being a sheep, essentially. Why don't you respond to what I actually said? Not liking Michael Moore because he is a liar and a hypocrite makes me some sheep FOX news viewer? To make it clear, I rarely watch FOX news, although I know the undertone was that I'm a conservative blind follower. An unfair accusation, made only to make yourself feel better because you're so much more independent than I am. How would you like it if I called you a liberal bandwagon-jumper that had no idea what you're talking about and gets his opinions from MTV and his stoner friends who also don't know what they're talking about? Oh, "don't take it the wrong way."

~Neszis~

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sabiss In reply to Neszis [2005-02-25 20:00:31 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn't consider Neszis as a blind conservative, he's more open minded than many other republicans and democrats... Of course, our points of view don't converge... I'm more of a leftist (by US standards, of course... Here in France, I'm considered right wing )
As for Moore... I found that movie "nice", but I did take it with skepticism, some facts weren't all that believable... I preferred Bowling for Columbine and Mike Strikes Back much more.

Anyway, Moore took a nice blow at Bush, although it (sadly) didn't stop him, and this pic really sends that message through...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Neszis In reply to sabiss [2005-02-25 23:07:01 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much .

~Neszis~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

glogauer In reply to mobsta [2005-02-22 14:26:40 +0000 UTC]

You're probably right!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Neszis [2005-02-22 00:27:41 +0000 UTC]

"MUCH MORE SYMPATHETIC AND COURAGEOUS"

Obviously you're implying Moore rather than Bush, although I'd never put Moore on the same level with the President. I wouldn't even put him on the same level as myself. This lying dirtbag can go die in a corner somewhere. He's misleading America's Left into believing more bulls*** than they're already being fed.

Courageous? You mean like owning millions of dollars of real estate, yet still pretending to be a champion of the proletariat kind of courageous? You mean editing so that he never makes a direct false accusation so that he can hide behind the fact that "he's just an entertainer" when it's convenient kind of courageous? You mean making vastly misleading conclusions and twisting evidence sometimes as far as to mean the exact OPPOSITE of what the full message conveys kind of courageous? He hides behind his status as an entertainer and his false image of the proletariat, and although I can say he has balls for making a critical movie, he's a hypocrite and a liar, who I can never think of as courageous.

Calling Moore sympathetic is laughable. LAUGHABLE. Just look into this guy's personal life, you'll see that he has no sympathy for the working class he claims to represent. Not personally, anyways. And not more than anyone else does. That bastard is the most two-faced popular figure of my entire generation. I can prove it if you'd like. Give me a specific "fact" in any of his films, and I will tell you how they are misleading, false, or the rare occasion of when I agree with it.

~Neszis~

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Neszis In reply to Neszis [2005-02-25 23:24:42 +0000 UTC]

It is not noble to lie in politics, although this sort of thing is commonplace and has been for years. I'm not excusing it, and I recognize that President Bush has made mistakes (although I do not believe he has lied to the American people as you do). However, DELIBERATELY misleading them like Moore causes me to dislike him, and his extreme popularity despite his hypocritical nature and false demeanor leaves a bad taste in my mouth. On the other hand, I still believe it is good to be in Iraq. The world is a better place without Saddam. I don't feel comfortable saying "Saddam gasses and murders his own people, but THAT'S NOT OUR PROBLEM!" I have a very generally unaccepted view of why we are in Iraq involving the Euro and banking that stemmed an oncoming mass Depression, but that's beside the point.

~Neszis~

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SiLeNtPuNk In reply to Neszis [2005-02-27 23:26:03 +0000 UTC]

there are worst dictators than Saddam and no one is doing anything about them unless it suits them... unless its for the objectives on their agenda

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Neszis In reply to SiLeNtPuNk [2005-03-01 03:58:46 +0000 UTC]

I agree wholeheartedly. What about Darfour (sp)? Then again, what is the UN doing about it? However, if Iraq is where we are, it's a great place to start. I'm glad we're starting at all, unlike other countries who prefer to sit back and preemptively lick their wounds. 600,000 dead from Saddam, and why? Because they were Kurdish. Iraq is a great place to liberate. And yes, we DID liberate them. Most Iraqis admittedly want us gone, but they also popularly believe that they are better off without Saddam. I want us out of Iraq as much as anyone, but we should NOT leave until the job is done. That would be horribly irresponsible. We are helping rebuild that country.

~Neszis~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SiLeNtPuNk In reply to Neszis [2005-02-27 23:25:58 +0000 UTC]

there are worst dictators than Saddam and no one is doing anything about them unless it suits them... unless its for the objectives on they're agenda

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

glogauer In reply to Neszis [2005-02-24 19:55:03 +0000 UTC]

I just think that your emotions blind your eyes :

If I find Michael Moore more sympathetic than George Bush, it is primarly because he never sends anybody to the electric chair and nobody ever dies of any of his decisions, which is not the case of Bush.

Also, Moore is courageous in my humble because he opposed publicly his voice to this awful war in Iraq BEFORE its beginning and he's continuing to do so. You know better than me that in your very «democratic» country, it is not quite obvious these days where a lot of said patriotic people are completely intolerant to this kind of action.

You're stating that Moore is a liar. What proof of that do you have?
And tell me : If he is so a liar, why does anybody he talks about in his films sue him in justice until his bankruptcy?
If it's so easy to prove his lies?

And don't forget that President Bush also lied about WMD in Iraq.
This is a proven facts admitted all over the world. And what about the hypocrisy in the White House administration?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Neszis [2005-02-21 23:33:07 +0000 UTC]

"MUCH MORE SYMPATHETIC AND COURAGEOUS"

Obviously you're implying Moore rather than Bush, although I'd never put Moore on the same level with the President. I wouldn't even put him on the same level as myself. This lying dirtbag can go die in a corner somewhere. He's misleading America's Left into believing more bulls*** than they're already being fed.

Courageous? You mean like owning millions of dollars of real estate, yet still pretending to be a champion of the proletariat kind of courageous? You mean editing so that he never makes a direct false accusation so that he can hide behind the fact that "he's just an entertainer" when it's convenient kind of courageous? You mean making vastly misleading conclusions and twisting evidence sometimes as far as to mean the exact OPPOSITE of what the full message conveys kind of courageous? He hides behind his status as an entertainer and his false image of the proletariat, and although I can say he has balls for making a critical movie, he's a hypocrite and a liar, who I can never think of as courageous.

Calling Moore sympathetic is laughable. LAUGHABLE. Just look into this guy's personal life, you'll see that he has no sympathy for the working class he claims to represent. Not personally, anyways. And not more than anyone else does. That bastard is the most two-faced popular figure of my entire generation. I can prove it if you'd like. Give me a specific "fact" in any of his films, and I will tell you how they are misleading, false, or the rare occasion of when I agree with it.

~Neszis~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Le-Christoph [2005-02-21 19:13:18 +0000 UTC]

*Awaiting for Neszis to absolutly destroy this one*

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

pector In reply to Le-Christoph [2005-07-20 02:33:23 +0000 UTC]

are you boyfriend and boyfriend or you just cocksuck neszis for fun

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

glogauer In reply to Le-Christoph [2005-02-21 19:49:38 +0000 UTC]

O.K., wait and see...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

glogauer In reply to Le-Christoph [2005-02-21 19:41:14 +0000 UTC]

So, wait and see...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

King-of-Not [2005-02-21 17:38:13 +0000 UTC]

This is wonderful! I liked that movie and how he exposed Bush's connection to the Saudis.

15 of the hijackers were Saudis. NOT ONE was Iraqi or Afghani, btw.

Just in case you missed it, have you heard Bush's "Trifecta" remark?
[link]
Working on a little animation based on that.

I mean, in real life, if Clinton had ACTUALLY joked "Ever heard of 'wag the dog'?" he'd have been impeached and jailed inside a day. On the other hand Bush told that again and again and again at elite clubs throught this country and the media barely touched him. An archaic term from betting on a horse race. To keep from losing too much, you bet on the top 3 horses, because one coming in gets back some of your bet. If all three come in, you come out with a very tidy sum of money. In Bush's case, I suppose the horses he bet on were "War, Death and Plaugue".

Perhaps you could do a trifecta image? Bush waving betting stubs as three of the four horsemen of the apocalypse come in first?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Neszis In reply to King-of-Not [2005-02-21 23:22:31 +0000 UTC]

Bush's connection to the Saudis is one of necessity. It's not a BUSH connection per se, it's a Presidency connection. Yes, the Sauds are sleazebags, but if we were not close to them, where would our oil come from? If liberals would let us drill Alaska, we'd be able to cut ties to them. Moore lies in his film outwright saying that they own 7% of America (or rather, having someone else say it and passing it off as his truth, so that if someone confronts him about the falsehood he can just say 'I didn't say that, someone else did!'). In fact, the number that is cited (I believe it was 800 billion dollars?) is not even 7 percent of the TOTAL FOREIGN investment in America only. It's closer to three percent. In addition, in Michael Moore's "War Room" section of his site, he claims to back up every single line in Fahrenheit 9/11 with a source. Both of the sources cited for that 800 billion dollars were examined, and NEITHER of them say anything about 800 billion dollars. Meaning, it's made up. I'm not positive, but I believe one of them even says it's closer to 400 billion.

Assuming that his figure were true, though, consider this: if Bush were to snub the Saudis so that they withdrew their support from America like Moore implies he SHOULD do, that would cut out "7 percent of America's" funding. That would quickly amount to a deep nationwide depression, which would spread to the rest of the world. Thousands to millions of people die from starvation, disease, and poverty.

So it's about a threefold lie that Moore told in that section, and you got fooled. Still happy with that fat bastard? I can do it with nearly every piece of "evidence" in F9/11 if you'd like.

~Neszis~

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

glogauer In reply to Neszis [2005-02-22 13:58:43 +0000 UTC]

~Neszis wrote :

«So it's about a threefold lie that Moore told in that section, and you got fooled. Still happy with that fat bastard? I can do it with nearly every piece of "evidence" in F9/11 if you'd like.»

Hey!!!
Be warned that I won't tolerate any insults on the comments of my Deviations!
Stay polite, please!
Or go away!

Is that clear enough?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Neszis In reply to glogauer [2005-03-06 16:13:57 +0000 UTC]

Sorry about that.

~Neszis~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

King-of-Not In reply to Neszis [2005-02-22 00:29:07 +0000 UTC]

It would be so much saner to look for ways to use less energy and alternative sources. But the corporations that have Bush and co bought and paid for simply earn so much short term money, they feel no need to change direction.

"So it's about a threefold lie that Moore told in that section"----snip

One thing I hear quite commonly along 'rightist' discussions (aka rabid Radio ravings) is the repetition in talking of the 'left' of Goebbles's statement that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth.

I agree with that, but I don't think the 'left' is doing the lying. It's the rightists who seem to have such a fondness for Hitler.

Face it, Bush and his puppet masters are nothing but a cabal of elites who literally seek to profit at the country's expense. I don't need figures for that. If you own/are connected to lots of OIL/Gas/Energy investments and the price of feul rises faster than inflation, you make BIG MONEY. Every cent gas rises puts another few billion in thier pocket.

And, unless you are one of them (I.E. A billionaire investor) I really doubt they think highly of you parroting the flood of talk radio propaganda. I think they say "What fools they are to believe our LIES!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Neszis In reply to King-of-Not [2005-03-06 16:13:23 +0000 UTC]

There's nothing I can say to that except that yes, there are some very evil, corrupt people in the world that will indeed profit off this war. I don't believe Bush is one of them, although some of his friends might be. However, I don't believe that it was the purpose of the war in the first place. It's a side effect, and it's a known fact that war brings money into the economy.

~Neszis~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0