Comments: 71
LDFranklin [2009-06-10 19:30:40 +0000 UTC]
I'm loving that sky!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
hhryah [2009-06-09 23:37:01 +0000 UTC]
This one looks so realistic! Not that the others don't, but this one has a sort of gentle and natural quality in its color levels that I think the others don't quite have as much. Beautiful!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
TobiasRichter [2009-05-29 19:26:26 +0000 UTC]
sky is great as allways and i like this one more but to sad that the tree doesn't stand alone.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
ashlite [2009-05-27 14:06:06 +0000 UTC]
Gorgeous photograph! the colours are absolutely stunning.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
aReDiQaRTz [2009-05-27 14:00:49 +0000 UTC]
i just like this picture....
nice picture...
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
pepeyo [2009-05-26 23:42:53 +0000 UTC]
fantastic sun rise view , those shapes in the sky are unique!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
t-fUs [2009-05-26 22:10:17 +0000 UTC]
beautiful D
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
hougaard In reply to AndyMumford [2009-05-26 21:48:21 +0000 UTC]
true...but you can see that it's pre-pre sunrise light...alpenglow right? Trying to get detail from the tree would have been a nightmare. I have a 3x1 pano of the direct red light on the clouds
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
AndyMumford In reply to hougaard [2009-05-27 09:55:41 +0000 UTC]
I know you're not arguing mate...and you know that when I make criticisms I'm not saying "Oh you should've done this or that" because I completely respect the decisions you make in the field.....It's the same thing here really, I'm kind of just thinking out loud about how the silhouette of the tree could be cleaner. I had a similar thing here [link] where I wanted the red sky, but the more I moved around to get it in, the more I lost the silhouettes of the trees to the dark bakground and I couldn't get a shot that worked. Moving closer gave me the same problem that you stated - the silhouettes would have taken up too much of the sky.
Not sure what's the best way in these situations, silhouettes are really tricky
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
hougaard In reply to AndyMumford [2009-05-31 14:45:39 +0000 UTC]
They are a pain in the ass. Like I've mentioned, if theres enough contrast then TK's luminosity masks can solve the problem.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Xacerb8ted [2009-05-26 20:20:35 +0000 UTC]
This is gorgeous, and kind of makes me want to live in South Africa. I especially like the star; it took a minute to notice it, and now I think it's the best part of the shot. <3
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Justin-Simpson [2009-05-26 19:57:19 +0000 UTC]
dude, awesome!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
lori77 [2009-05-26 19:46:28 +0000 UTC]
Wow, amazing landscape, beautiful colors, perfect composition. Great work!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
chill2win [2009-05-26 18:42:25 +0000 UTC]
hey
great shot with a beautiful sky.
but i have to say i find the tree a little distracting.
i would have tried to get the shot without it, whether this would have meant moving in closer or switching to a longer lens.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
hougaard In reply to iustyn [2009-05-26 18:06:56 +0000 UTC]
1
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
hougaard In reply to iustyn [2009-05-26 18:38:44 +0000 UTC]
yip, but no blending
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
MR-Artz [2009-05-26 15:50:58 +0000 UTC]
i want the biggest format!!! this is really awesome *รง*
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
arqhugo [2009-05-26 14:49:33 +0000 UTC]
Awesome light hougaard!!!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Fishermang [2009-05-26 14:47:08 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Owner
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
hougaard In reply to Fishermang [2009-05-26 14:47:54 +0000 UTC]
Please don't bring up the watermark issue. we've agreed to disagree
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Fishermang In reply to hougaard [2009-05-26 15:07:26 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Owner
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
hougaard In reply to Fishermang [2009-05-26 15:15:53 +0000 UTC]
I'm not going to discuss the watermark issue again. I did not say you're criticising me, but you brought up a topic that got us both arguing last time.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Fishermang In reply to hougaard [2009-05-26 15:45:51 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Owner
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
hougaard In reply to Fishermang [2009-05-26 15:56:18 +0000 UTC]
You instigate negativity as you just did in this comment. Look at the image...do you see that I listened to everyones watermark comments? drop this argument please. You got what you wanted from my images.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
shebeast2 [2009-05-26 14:46:19 +0000 UTC]
stunnin
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
| Next =>