Comments: 31
thamuria [2007-02-22 05:39:55 +0000 UTC]
I love the colouring!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
moforuss [2007-02-21 23:46:01 +0000 UTC]
Wow,love the white background and great design.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fractalinda [2007-02-05 23:32:59 +0000 UTC]
Lovely impression, but I see a weeping willow tree. Very nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fractalinda In reply to hyruwen [2007-02-08 00:10:07 +0000 UTC]
My pleasure; I like it very much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hyruwen In reply to ImagersFractalDDs [2007-02-03 21:25:40 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I'd be glad to, so how should I donate, and to which print account?
I'll be going for the aspect ratio 1.33:1. The maximum size is 7200 x 5400. Quality 500 takes approximately a day to render, while at 200 quality takes 12 hours to render. Samples:
Render at 1024 x 768, quality 500, before Photoshop manipulation: [link]
Render at 1024 x 768, quality 200, before Photoshop manipulation: [link]
There is some differences if you compare it side-by-side. Which do you like more, 200 or 500?
I don't think I could do it at a higher resolution or quality because it would be very impractical. So tell me your thoughts, after all, it's you who want a print, so it has to be according to your specifications.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HexisR [2007-02-01 07:26:46 +0000 UTC]
Oh so very mad, fool!
Love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JennDixonPhotography [2007-01-31 15:36:43 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful! I love the use of the white background.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FractalRock [2007-01-31 15:31:28 +0000 UTC]
Actually, I like the dark part on the bottom. It stands out better against the white background. Nice design. And kind of you to offer parameters!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FractalRock In reply to hyruwen [2007-01-31 16:15:53 +0000 UTC]
Sure, I'd love to take a look at them. I was trying to tell just by glancing what variations were used, and I couldn't decide if it was just linear or linear and spherical. Who knows, maybe I'm totally wrong! Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1