Comments: 8
Zaggat [2009-01-25 12:07:13 +0000 UTC]
just amazing)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fleur555 [2009-01-11 15:56:44 +0000 UTC]
Hiya, from
I use the JPEG file format for my images, but I have an option on Paint Shop Pro that I use when I'm saving to lower the file compression, and that tends to raise the quality of the JPEG image. Of course, nothing wrong with using PNG, as I used to use it for the transparencies that it allowed in Poser6 until I started putting backgrounds into the program itself and rendering... But anyway, just wanted to leave that. ^^
Beautiful BEAUTIFUL image! I wish I could do that. In the running to become a background, that's for sure, as long as you don't mind of course. O_O
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hyruwen In reply to jimami [2009-01-11 13:27:18 +0000 UTC]
Background texture, you mean the repeating patterns? I'll admit it, I use a lot of Linear in my fractals If you talking about the multi-colored dust, I'll admit again, I used Photoshop brush to add them because the background was too boring.
It looks kind of different, the file I submitted. While that file is on my HD, the colors look more saturated and contrasting. Then, I submit this file, and when viewed at this page or when I click on the "Download" button, the colors changed a little.
I was just wondering, because that JPEGs have an embedded color profile that "tells" the monitors how to display it correctly so the colors will match for everyone's computers, while other file formats usually don't have that function. But I read from Wikipedia that most browsers don't support the embedded profile function... Just wondering. But I'm still glad that the colors are 90% accurate It might have been 90% accurate all this while, just that I might not have paid much attention to it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1