HOME | DD

IllustratedMenagerie — Borealopelta markmitchelli

#ankylosaur #ankylosaurus #camouflage #dinosaur #herbivore #paleoart #borealopelta
Published: 2018-01-15 16:49:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 3271; Favourites: 66; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description

The discovery and description of Borealopelta markmitchelli was a significant moment in the study of dinosaurs. Several other dinosaur species have been preserved with such detail that their coloration can be determined, (mostly by comparing the pigment structure of fossilized dinosaur feathers with those of modern birds) yet at about the size of a modern rhinoceros, Borealopelta is by far the largest.

At first glance, one might think that a heavily-armored, multi-ton animal would rely on its size, spikes, and plates to deter predators. Borealopelta was a reddish-brown on top, fading into a lighter shade on its belly. This form of countershading is a common pattern seen in many modern animals that rely on camouflage as their primary means of defense. It seems that Borealopelta was just as reliant on coloration as it was on size and armor in protection from predators. 

Perhaps it was being preyed upon enough that it needed the extra protection of this coloration in its forested habitat. Although Borealopelta may have weighed as much as three tons, the top predators of their time were carcharodontosaurids like Acrocanthosaurus, which could weigh twice as much and had muscular arms each ending in three meat-hook claws. To deter such a monstrous predator, Borealopelta may have needed a combination of spikes, armor, and camouflage to keep safe. 

Then again, maybe they just wanted to be left alone. To munch their long lives away in the shadowy forests of Early Cretaceous Canada. Sounds pretty good if you ask me.

Related content
Comments: 3

Rylan1010 [2023-04-26 00:38:43 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dinosaurzzzz [2018-01-15 17:06:51 +0000 UTC]

Great! Minor nitpick, but I don't think ankylosaurs, or any dinosaur, had claws on the fourth (and fifth) digit on the front limbs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IllustratedMenagerie In reply to Dinosaurzzzz [2018-01-15 17:59:08 +0000 UTC]

These two skeletons www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs… and archosaurmusings.files.wordpre… look to me to have a claw core on the fourth digit, although I don't know for sure as I've not examined the originals myself. These are both early to mid-cretaceous genera (Animantrax and Gastonia respectively) like Borealopelta, so it's possible that later Nodosauridae lost the fourth-digit claw? The Edmontonia at the NYC museum upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia… *appears* to not have a claw on the fourth digit, but again, that's just my observation of a skeleton at a bit of a distance. If so, it could suggest that at least later nodasaurs didn't have a claw on digit 4. Since Borealopelta is closer in time to Gastonia (which was my reference for Borealopelta's legs), *if* early Nodosauridae had the forth-digit claw, Borealopelta likely would too. This is all conjecture off the top of my head, so take it with a mine of salt.

Tyranttr has rendered their Ankylosaurus without claws on digits 4 and 5, and I trust their process: Ankylosaurus magniventris - Saurian . Most good reconstructions I can find of Ankylosauridae only have nails or claws on the first three digits. Seems to agree with the limbs I see on Euoplocephalus.

Again, this is all based on what I can see in skeleton pictures from 5+ feet away. I wouldn't be surprised to find that what I'm seeing as a claw core is an un-keratinized nub. That was my process leading up to reconstructing the legs, but it's obviously inferior to being able to work with the specimens myself. I wouldn't be surprised if you are correct. 

Thank you for the critique! Cheers,

-Keenan

👍: 0 ⏩: 0