Comments: 15
Midway2009 [2021-01-01 01:20:33 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
wombatty10 [2009-06-08 04:40:43 +0000 UTC]
Love your work!!! I just submitted a colorization of your wonderful drawing ==> [link]
Please let me know what you think!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bumble-B-e-e [2008-12-06 22:20:24 +0000 UTC]
Talk of Thunderbirds and Angels makes me think of the "Supermarionation" series of the 60s, Thunderbirds: [link] ) and Captain Scarlet: [link]
Oh, and the Beach boys. "She'll have fun, fun, fun, 'til her daddy takes the t-bird away".
/geek
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bumble-B-e-e In reply to JohnStaton [2008-12-07 14:24:44 +0000 UTC]
Hehe. Well, it's been a while since those TV series aired too - but I watched the re-runs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wbd [2008-12-06 04:50:50 +0000 UTC]
I think the biggest reason that they use the F-16 is because it's a lot cheaper than an F-15. There may be some maneuverability advantage, but I can't say for sure about that.
Nice work on that pic- Yeager looks great, and the F-16 is well-drawn, and in a tricky perspective, no less.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
InsolentWhelp [2008-12-06 03:35:44 +0000 UTC]
Wait 'til my military aficionado buddy sees this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wraith11 [2008-12-06 01:33:32 +0000 UTC]
Man, I thought I must have been damn near the only person to have seen that show.
Sweet pic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JohnStaton In reply to wraith11 [2008-12-12 21:55:38 +0000 UTC]
Yea, I lament the fact that we see less and less hardware heavy anime these days.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gideon020 In reply to JohnStaton [2009-01-01 06:30:01 +0000 UTC]
I only saw the first three eps of the 801st TTS, and that was because I somehow found a VCD of it in Malaysia for fifteen ringgit.
Still got the disc too but no VCD player now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zodtgr8 [2008-12-05 22:24:41 +0000 UTC]
The reason the Thunderbirds fly F-16s is because the F-15 is more expensive, more complex and more maintenance intensive. The F-16 is relatively cheaper, simpler and easier to maintain. Plus the F-16's design makes it much more maneuverable in the low altitude, low speed regime (which is where most of the Manuvers they demonstrate take place); the F-15 handles better at high altitude around the +400-ish knot regime.
Plus, since tubofans perform much better at sea level, the thrust is enough to give the lightly-loaded F-16s a Thrust to weight ratio of parity or beter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zodtgr8 In reply to JohnStaton [2008-12-06 06:44:32 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I fav'd that a week or two ago...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0