Comments: 11
squonkhunter [2010-05-19 05:37:19 +0000 UTC]
WOW! This is great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KGBigelow In reply to Loriele [2010-05-13 16:46:58 +0000 UTC]
well whaddya know!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KGBigelow In reply to EveryNextDream [2005-06-22 20:36:29 +0000 UTC]
And I keep getting mad at myself for neglecting true proportion and leaving pieces incomplete! Thankyou much!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
emptiness [2005-02-19 17:59:28 +0000 UTC]
They need to start making larger scanners, dammit. Expensive perhaps, but helpful.
Now, we're revisiting our basic shapes. Very sharp, very modern.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KGBigelow In reply to emptiness [2005-02-20 04:52:32 +0000 UTC]
they do make bigger ones that can scan up to five feet of material, but they cost more than a personal jet. oh, I can\'t have nice things.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
emptiness In reply to KGBigelow [2005-02-20 15:44:59 +0000 UTC]
Damn! That's interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tiamat9 [2005-02-17 03:22:53 +0000 UTC]
Great structure and form. Excellent contrasts. Fine work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KGBigelow In reply to tiamat9 [2005-02-17 04:34:54 +0000 UTC]
thankyou much, as usual
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tiamat9 In reply to KGBigelow [2005-02-17 05:56:25 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0