Comments: 19
miirex [2016-11-02 14:09:24 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vannjaren [2016-10-13 11:14:22 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, I didn't even realise you struggle with landscapes as the ones you have drawn before have always looked good to me - but then I also struggle a lot with landscapes but Im trying to work on that.
Your shading on the mountains looks nice here and you convey the scene very nicely - your lighting on the other one with the aurora looks really great by the way, wonderful reflected colours! (I need to draw an aurora at some point)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lapis-lazuri In reply to Vannjaren [2016-10-14 07:56:11 +0000 UTC]
Well, struggle.... I've kind of surrendered to the grim truth that I can't do it the way I want to. But at least now I have the tool to help me with it, so that I can make a nice and scenic landscape wherever I need it as a background.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lapis-lazuri In reply to Vannjaren [2016-10-15 17:10:46 +0000 UTC]
Nop. It's a landscape 3D generator. Which is how all of a sudden I can put a plausible landscape into a drawing, which I really, really suck at otherwise XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lapis-lazuri In reply to Vannjaren [2016-10-15 18:26:42 +0000 UTC]
The one I use is quite powerful although it takes a bit of imagination to work with because it is basically purely mathematical. Once you get used to how its functions work and combine with each other it becomes quite easy to generate spectacular landscapes. The key to it is erosion simulation though, this is what turns a geometrical function into a realistic landscape. I'm not sure how powerful the computer needs to be though. Basically, all those functions are easy for the machine to render, except for erosion - erosion is heavy and if you don't have enough processor power it will take a long while to render every time.
Eh.... if you say so.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lapis-lazuri In reply to Vannjaren [2016-10-16 15:00:14 +0000 UTC]
You don't have to because you see the result of those mathematics graphically, right away. And it's World Machine, a pretty renowned one. It has a free version, too.
Well, I don't often draw landscapes, if I can avoid it.... precisely because they are much too difficult. But thanks anyway, again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vannjaren In reply to lapis-lazuri [2016-10-16 21:15:40 +0000 UTC]
Ha, I don't know when, but I'm pretty sure I WILL try it, it definitely seems like it could be really useful for the purposes I had in mind! (also, if I can build 3D environments, then I could maybe draw certain locations consistently from different angles - could be very helpful indeed!)
Ah yes, plants are definitely something I need to work on.
Thank goodness at least there aren't any Krovendraekk that live in rainforests, as that would be far too much vegetation for me to handle. :'D I think temperate forests, tundras, mountains and deserts aren't just as bad...
I find it very hard to do lighting and perspective with vegetation, and also to make it look interesting and varied like real vegetation typically is...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lapis-lazuri In reply to Vannjaren [2016-10-17 11:44:00 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I've thought about that too. Would be interesting to do indeed, and helpful.
Yeah, indeed. It's somehow.... intimidating, knowing of all the detail that goes in there.... I think it would take some time seriously studying those places to start getting the hang of it. Which I kinda want to do at some point....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lapis-lazuri In reply to Vannjaren [2016-10-18 11:57:59 +0000 UTC]
Certainly.
Thank you.... we'll see.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vannjaren In reply to lapis-lazuri [2016-10-18 12:04:02 +0000 UTC]
Definitely seems so...
And ha, I believe you'll do it, you have the skills and determination to figure it with a bit of practise. Like most things, when you find a technique it's not so bad - though the finding of the technique is the tricky part...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lapis-lazuri In reply to Vannjaren [2016-10-18 12:46:42 +0000 UTC]
I may have skills, but not determination. We'll see.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0