HOME | DD
LuadoChackal β Hiiro No Kakera
Published: 2012-07-09 23:31:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 10692; Favourites: 695; Downloads: 126
Redirect to original
Description
Hiiro No Kakera rereading of crayonsHiiro No Kakera releitura em lΓ‘pis de cor
Related content
Comments: 207
Meu deusss, que pintura espetacular! parabΓ©ns pelo trabalho.
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
fucking tracer. just sell your body for money if you want that much attention, bitch, and stop giving artists a bad name. Can't ruin the name "slut".
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't believe this person used a filter. I think it was coloured with coloured pencils. Some parts are different from the original, and there isn't a way to have that replicated in a Photshop filter. For example, the berries on the right hand side of the picture, near the subject's head, does not contain the same number of berries as in the original picture. These different are usually attributed to the fact that the artist probably didn't want to replicate ALL the berries, and thus got tired and lazily sped through it. I know I've done that before in a detail intensive drawing, especially background stuff.
The hair is drawing differently around the nape of his neck; the original shows two strands layering over his neck, but this person only chose to do one, and not only that, but to pretty much hide most of the neck.
The face on this picture is narrower than on the original, and several hair strands are drawn more thickly that that of the original picture. The patterns also differ, especially when it comes to the sizes of certain things (the white lines are off, the blue oval in his sleeve is much smaller than the original).
However, this doesn't make the person completely innocent. It's possible that there was either some tracing involved, or she's very good at looking at a person's art and copying. I've overlayed the original and this one, and in some places the lines match up perfectly, however in others, it's skewed. It would not surprise me if she used a grid to do this. It's understandable if the pictures themselves are off as well, since this looks like a photograph, and those are subject to all kinds of distortions.
tl;dr I think she coloured this on her own, and it wasn't a Photoshop filter. However, it's possible she could have traced it, either in whole or a part of it, or she's surprisingly good at referencing.
Do I believe she deserved a DD? No. She's definitely not linking back to the original source, and overall this isn't completely original, only a copy. I think in terms of her colouring ability, however, she is good. She just chooses to not make anything original with it, which is a shame.
π: 0 β©: 0
Amazing work or not, it' sad you use your talents to completely copy off of other's work, without even crediting the original.
π: 0 β©: 0
And the fact that the DD was removed, but they left the STOLEN.PICTURE.UP. is depressing. C'mon DA, you defend the people who break the law, yet you completely ignore the people who buy stuff and pay for shit on the site, and THAT'S the stuff that is giving you your fat paychecks. If you piss them off, they'll all leave, and there will be no more money!
Eventually you will be sued, and unlike what the rules say (and I actually saw this), you won't get any money from the people that sued you.
Actually try to please the people that keep this site running, instead of helping people break the law.
My gosh.
π: 0 β©: 2
the picture can't be taken down until the original artist asks to, and the original artist is Kazuki Yone, a famous japanese artist who probably doesn't have time to go around the internet to make complaints. Besides this is a reproduction of the work, it's not reposting of the original so it could be considered fanart. It's not really such a big deal that it stays on the site as long as the artist doesn't receive praise like it's their original work
π: 0 β©: 3
1. traced
2. no permission
3. no credit
All in conclusion: ~LuadoChackal was a lazy pile of crap who didnt bother credit and felt the need to rip off some one who worked hard for their own praise and butt kissing.
π: 0 β©: 1
i'm tired of talking to you people :/
π: 0 β©: 1
1. Public site
2. Open to any one
3. Free to coment/reply
π: 0 β©: 0
The fact that it is so renowned makes the theft even dumber to attempt. That work is not original and is theft.
π: 0 β©: 1
this is redrawing of work, theft is when you repost the artwork unaltered
π: 0 β©: 2
Copyright infringement is when someone takes artwork and uses it as their own, altered or not.
[link]
I suggest you read up on this.
π: 0 β©: 1
i'm tired of talking about this, believe what you want to believe, i don't care
π: 0 β©: 2
If you don't care, then why do you keep replying?
π: 0 β©: 0
If you take a song, change the lyrics, but keep the music itself the same, it is still copyright infringement. It is violating intellectual property laws.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, but the principle is the same.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, apples and more fucking apples.
π: 0 β©: 1
i have to disagree 
π: 0 β©: 0
It is not fanart. Read the DA rules. Fanart has to be 100% original, but you can use bases or refs. Altering a picture then posting it without permission is theft.
It's not a big deal? Going against copyrights isn't a big deal?
Oh jeez.....
π: 0 β©: 3
Alright, first I didn't even request this piece! I requested a different piece that the lady didn't enjoy much but said she would choose something else from her gallery. Second, I didn't know that this was stolen art! I was so excited when someone that I had found got a DD, so when I saw that it was stolen work I was devastated!
π: 0 β©: 0
This, my dear friend, is why I hate people.
π: 0 β©: 1
People suck. Damn them!
π: 0 β©: 1
I love you for that comment.
π: 0 β©: 1
Tracing totally means they made it by scratch, bro. They copy every line of the picture, and color. HOLY BEEJUS!
π: 0 β©: 0
there's no need to snap at me and act like a little child, she didn't alter it, she re redid it from scratch in colored pencils. It was wrong of her not to credit the original artist but other than that she hasn't done anything wrong as far as deviantART is concerened.
if you must know, ANY type of fanart is illegal! weather it's completely made by you or traced or eyeballed. If you keep fanart in your home that's fine but the moment you post it online you can find yourself with a lawsuit in your hands no matter how original your art is.
But despite it being illegal it is accepted on dA as long as the artist doesn't make a profit of it. This drawing was made by this deviant from scratch, even if she traced it, she probably spent hours on hours coloring this with colored pencils. It is an accepted form of fanart on dA and as long as Kazuki Yone doesn't ask for it to be taken down it can stay here for 100 years and there's nothing you can do about it.
So calm down and move on
π: 0 β©: 5
Actually she didn't recreate it at all. The only thing she did was render it in photoshop to get a coloured pencil crayon effect.
This is 100% plagiarism.
π: 0 β©: 1
i work in colored pencils and i am 100% sure that this is redone not rendered. Besides if you look closely you will notice differences in strands of hair atc. This work is recreated from scratch on paper with colored pencils. There is no filter in the world that can make this effect without loosing details and sharpness, but i guess people who never used them can't know that there's a limit to what photoshop filters can do
π: 0 β©: 3
Ok, so I draw using pencils and colored pencils too, and I still know it is possible to make it look like it is on paper and colored with pencil in photoshop. You can basically do ANYTHING in photoshop (well, artistically).
π: 0 β©: 1
i'm tired of this, believe whatever, i don't care :/
π: 0 β©: 1
Then stop replying! Lol, fucktard.
Also found out you have traced stuff in your gallery too. Makes sense now.
π: 0 β©: 1
resorting to name calling? you completely pooped on any shred of credit you had
i don't want to ever have to do with people like you on this site
π: 0 β©: 1
You already have?, by supporting a thief because you trace yourself.
Don't complain, if you refuse to not reply.
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh whoop-dee-do, you know how pencil crayons work I should give you a medal.
Looking back in her gallery it does seem that she used pencil crayons to recreate the artworks so apologies for jumping the gun.
π: 0 β©: 1
Actually, after using PS for a little while, I can honestly say that yes. There is a filter that can keep the sharpness of the strands of hair.
π: 0 β©: 1
art filters destroy lines and shapes, and what i was saying is that the strands of hair are different from this image to the original, it's because even if she traced, because this is traditional she couldn't copy every snall detail like small strands of hair so she drew her own. If this would be a filter there wouldn't be any difference between the images.
Looc carefully at the strands of hair in the right side of the face, actually all the strands of hair are different, also the markings on the clothings have different proportions than the original. But if you really want proof, here's the overlay of the artworks, they are very different in proportions, it can not be overlayed better than this, the original has a smaller head, there are too many things different for me to overlay this better but you can go ahead and do it yourself if you don't believe me
[link]
if this would be just with a filter it would fit perfectly no?
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm not talking about the fact that she traced. That's not really something I'm about to get into.
" There is no filter in the world that can make this effect without losing details and sharpness, but i guess people who never used them can't know that there's a limit to what photoshop filters can do"
I'm saying, yes. It actually is possible to retain the sharpness. Not necessarily for this picture, but it can be done.
π: 0 β©: 1
i don't know what kind of sharpness you're talking about but no filter in the world can make a drawing look like it's made with colored pencils. It will just be a poor excuse of a texture, that's all, it will scream 'filter' from a mile.
Art takes work and time and no filter can let artist get around hard work. Actually no real artists uses filters, only facebook users to make their photos look more "interesting" but end up with cheap effects
and yes, you said she applied a filter and didn't draw the drawing, but yea, you'll just move on and argue about something else.
Believe what you want, use filters and see if you can trick anyone into believing it's real pencil work
π: 0 β©: 1
I used the strands of hair as an example. You're really quick to argue, aren't you?
I'm just trying to inform you. My brother had me experiment with PS, and during the time I was using it, I had found a way to make it imitate colored pencils. Of course it wasn't 100% like colored pencils, but it was pretty close. Any blurriness, however depending on how blurry, could be mended with a sharpening tool.
But then again, I could just be mixing up art programs. Who knows, it's been a while since I've had PS.
π: 0 β©: 1
well maybe it looked good to you
an effect like this [link] is obviously a filter and it looks crappy, i haven't been able to find a better one on the internet, or link to your miraculous effects and put your money where your mouth is
repairing blur with sharpen? that only works if there's very little blur involved
π: 0 β©: 0
Dude, he isn't acting like a child. Don't be rude. Why are you defending this person so much? This is basically tracing.
π: 0 β©: 2
Because they trace too :/
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh my god! Hahahahahaha! That's rich. I just laughed so hard at that..
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>