HOME | DD

markkarvon β€” Heading North

Published: 2013-12-09 17:17:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 9106; Favourites: 169; Downloads: 176
Redirect to original
Description The F-105 Thunderchief was designed to carry a single nuclear weapon at high speed and low altitude into Soviet airspace. Entering service in 1958, the F-105 was used extensively in the Vietnam War. As the primary strike aircraft, the Thunderchief flew over 20,000 sorties into some of the most heavily defended airspace in history. Able to carry up to 14,000 lbs of ordinance the Thunderchief could deliver a heavy blow. Unfortunately, rules of engagement and heavy defenses also meant the Thunderchief took heavy losses. Operating from Korat and Takhli air bases in Thailand, F-105 squadrons carried the war north to the Vietcong. This print depicts the takeoff of of one such mission. The airplane in this print was shot down by a MiG 21 on October 9, 1967. Pilot Major James Clements ejected but was captured and spent the rest of the war as a POW.
Related content
Comments: 46

TheMAN1946 [2017-09-05 02:25:16 +0000 UTC]

I was stationed in Korat in '67 as an Air Craft electrician on this Thud...great painting and so nice to see...thanks for posting...brought back many great and sad memories.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Enforcer57 [2015-08-12 02:35:00 +0000 UTC]

Great image of another great machine. I remember those being a common sight in the skies of the US. Rules of engagement that are written by morons who dn't want to hurt the enemy will result in losing 50% of your aircraft like happened ot the 105. Love the backdrop and the loadout you have here.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to Enforcer57 [2015-08-30 18:37:40 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ByteStudio [2014-01-19 05:29:57 +0000 UTC]

Another great painting of a lovely aircraft!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to ByteStudio [2015-08-30 18:37:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

01Damocles [2013-12-23 04:49:38 +0000 UTC]

You never cease to amaze Mark. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

EAMR262 In reply to 01Damocles [2014-01-13 00:21:04 +0000 UTC]

Indeed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jomaramos [2013-12-15 08:45:53 +0000 UTC]

Just plain awesome, Mark! You captured the grace of the Thud!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to jomaramos [2013-12-16 03:24:47 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jomaramos In reply to markkarvon [2014-01-06 22:43:04 +0000 UTC]

Please keep on drawing more of this forgotten but great airplane, the mightiest of the single-engined jets in the Vietnam War! You give the people who flew them and their mounts justice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RoadTripDog [2013-12-12 05:29:40 +0000 UTC]

I always enjoy the "you are there" feeling your art conveys to the viewer. I know, I keep saying it, but I am always amazed by it. I feel like I'm flying wingman here. Another fine work of art!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to RoadTripDog [2013-12-16 03:24:41 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RoadTripDog In reply to markkarvon [2013-12-17 05:04:49 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pvt-Hazard [2013-12-12 04:25:52 +0000 UTC]

great plane, and great picture to do it justice. It's a little sad but its no suprise that rules of engagement were always a problem.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to Pvt-Hazard [2013-12-16 03:24:34 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much. I wanted to convey that feeling of a little bit of sadness as the brave pilot takes off on another dangerous mission.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

griffonmeister [2013-12-10 07:06:58 +0000 UTC]

Superb work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to griffonmeister [2013-12-16 03:23:46 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

griffonmeister In reply to markkarvon [2013-12-20 06:01:40 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RageTH [2013-12-10 04:37:49 +0000 UTC]

Hell of a plane, and hell of a job making this, sir.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to RageTH [2013-12-16 03:23:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RageTH In reply to markkarvon [2014-01-12 23:16:08 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

welcometothedarksyde [2013-12-10 00:04:46 +0000 UTC]

I've heard interesting comparisons between the F-105 and the F-35

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to welcometothedarksyde [2013-12-16 03:23:32 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I saw that too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SwiftFlyer [2013-12-10 00:02:01 +0000 UTC]

Like them Century Series fighters!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to SwiftFlyer [2013-12-16 03:23:21 +0000 UTC]

Miles of character in every one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SwiftFlyer In reply to markkarvon [2013-12-17 03:05:28 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MensjeDeZeemeermin [2013-12-09 23:36:33 +0000 UTC]

It's amazing the service they got out of the thing, and it's almost the only case I know of a shut-down assembly line being reactivated to make more of an older design. Β While the plane seldom failed its brave pilots, I could wish it had been better able to defend itself in the air. Β Your usual brilliant work and choice of subject.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to MensjeDeZeemeermin [2013-12-16 03:22:58 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AndrewMcClure [2013-12-09 22:36:47 +0000 UTC]

Just watched a video on the Rolling Thunder campaign in Vietnam. This aircraft is amazing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to AndrewMcClure [2013-12-16 03:22:36 +0000 UTC]

It is an amazing machine. Funny I didn't like it when I was a kid. Thought it was ugly. Didn't get why the intakes looked so weird. Now it is one of my favorites.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GrummanCat [2013-12-09 22:23:38 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely LOVE the Thud! You did a magnificent job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to GrummanCat [2013-12-16 03:21:30 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sentinel28a [2013-12-09 22:12:27 +0000 UTC]

This was my dad's favorite aircraft--I think he owned every book on the F-105. Β I don't have the words to describe what a gorgeous painting this is.


I did a little digging on this particular aircraft. Β Turns out it had a name: "Damn You Charlie Brown!" Β It showed a pregnant Lucy as underwing "armpit" art. Β (You probably knew that already, but I thought I'd mention it.)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to sentinel28a [2013-12-16 03:21:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much. Yes, I knew about the name and artwork on the airplane.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sentinel28a In reply to markkarvon [2013-12-17 04:12:10 +0000 UTC]

I kind of figured you did. Β Your paintings definitely show that you know your history. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Enterprise206 [2013-12-09 21:14:03 +0000 UTC]

youve done it again. beautiful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to Enterprise206 [2013-12-16 03:19:22 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

focallength [2013-12-09 18:59:53 +0000 UTC]

Great work. Used to know someone who flew Phantoms in Vietnam. Story I heard is that the F-105 got its nickname from the sound it made when it hit the ground, since they had the glide characteristics of your average brick. Or so I was told.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

markkarvon In reply to focallength [2013-12-16 03:19:11 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much. Yes, that was the initial reason for the name but it later became a term of endearment that only those associated with it should use.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to markkarvon [2013-12-16 13:56:18 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

welcometothedarksyde In reply to focallength [2013-12-10 06:16:20 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to welcometothedarksyde [2013-12-10 14:00:48 +0000 UTC]

That it was. And yes, it has rather high wing loading due to its original design intent.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 [2013-12-09 18:22:05 +0000 UTC]

The mighty Thud.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

IsaacBickerstaff [2013-12-09 17:48:47 +0000 UTC]

Lovely picture, as always! At least it never had to carry out the mission for which it was designed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to IsaacBickerstaff [2013-12-16 03:18:06 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dullboy [2013-12-09 17:43:01 +0000 UTC]

It had large I-Beam like spars, could go Mach 2 and was capable of supersonic performance on the deck. It was really quite the airplane, and it was a shame that our rules of engagement caused so many losses. Really excellent picture.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to dullboy [2013-12-16 03:17:56 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0