HOME | DD

MauEvig β€” ProLifeDeadFetusImages

Published: 2012-03-18 01:42:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 1372; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description Alright so I learned from the pro-choice group that I'm part of ([link] ) that many of the images pro-lifers often use as icons and various other propaganda...just so happen to be dead fetus images.
Yep. You heard me right. If they REALLY supported not getting abortions, they shouldn't be using those images.

...And I wish they wouldn't. x.x To be honest, they're so creepy that I would have even less regret than ever about getting that thing out of my body if I ever became pregnant...x.x (...They almost tempt me to be completely pro-abortion...but I won't go that far...x.x if a woman really wants one of those things growing in her then it's her business not mine)
Related content
Comments: 48

LadyLambdadelta [2017-08-25 15:41:19 +0000 UTC]

I only support abortion in necessary circumstances.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MadKingFroggy [2016-01-12 01:26:35 +0000 UTC]

I hate that emotion responses override our logic and critical thinking centres of the brain. It's sad that many people fall into the trap of being dictated fully by their emotions, rather than combining both logic and emotion to reach sensible solutions and conclusions to problems...

If people could justΒ think things through rather than letting others manipulate their emotions and decide for them, we probably wouldn't have this mess of a world in the first place. Abortion would be legalised everywhere.


In Ireland it's illegal to get an abortion within the country, which means if you're suicidal or have a fatal complication and are too poor to go abroad... it is extremely likely you're going to die. I don't think that it's right to force women who don't want to have a baby to go through the 9 months and have it against their will, yet that's the reality in Ireland for many women...

Some Pro-lifers Really Need to Understand This...Ireland has had anti-abortion laws for around 30 years now. It has proven time and time again that anti-abortion laws do not even prevent abortion, and they make it very dangerous for a poor woman to be pregnant, especially if she develops a lethal abnormality.

This is what anti-abortion laws mean in Ireland.
Sick women are legally unable to receive the help that they need until they are at literally about to die.Women who have illnesses like cancer, heart diseaseΒ or organ damage are unable to get help at all during pregnancy.
25000Β women have travelled abroad to the UK in just the last 5 years,Β desperately seeking much needed terminations. And these are just the lucky ones who can afford it.Β In some cases, doctors are unable to access information on certain birth prΒ  Ireland, We Really Need To Have This Talk...Let me begin by asking you two simple questions:

Do you believe that you have the right to what happens to your own body?


Β Do you believe in freedom of speech, without the threat of persecution?Β 

I'll let you ponder that for a few seconds...
I have the right to free speech, and in this journal I intend to exercise it. I am being incredibly careful in my wording so as not to break any laws, but I shouldn't have to worry about freedom of speech and my right to speak freely on topics. This concern in itself is a sign that something is terribly wrong in the country of Ireland.
* * *
Today, I'm going to try tackling two very sensitive issues. I understand that writing about this may result in a heated debate, serious backlash of comments, and watchers unwatching, but I don't mind that. This is a discussion that is too often avoided that we really should talk aboutΒ I wrote these journals if you're interested btw, as well as created a pro-choice group (see link below). Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to MadKingFroggy [2016-01-12 01:53:21 +0000 UTC]

It is pretty sad, but unfortunately that's the reality of the world we live in today. Sadly it seems to be moving in that direction in the United States as well. They aren't going to completely eradicate abortion per say, but they do want to make it extremely difficult, especially not allowing women to get one covered by Medicaid for example.Β 

I don't think it's right to force women to have a baby either.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MadKingFroggy In reply to MauEvig [2016-01-12 02:06:15 +0000 UTC]

Firstly our rights to privacy are taken, then our rights to free speech, now the rights to our very bodies (or at least women's rights) are under threat.

I get the feeling that by 2050 we'll be nothing more than slaves at this rate.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MapleTeaa [2015-09-22 00:02:54 +0000 UTC]

wtf that's weird XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HelloThere9999 [2015-05-26 18:08:52 +0000 UTC]

I've seen people use miscarried fetuses and call it ''ABORTION!111!!!''
Silly pro lifers making sad slideshows of dead fetuses

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverBeastLaguz [2014-12-27 03:28:22 +0000 UTC]

These are what real abortions look like at an early term of pregnancy. No dead fetuses there.

stfuconservatives.tumblr.com/p…
www.thisismyabortion.com/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to SilverBeastLaguz [2014-12-27 04:18:29 +0000 UTC]

Well you're preaching to the choir. I'm pro choice. It's all just a emotional appeal gimmick.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverBeastLaguz In reply to MauEvig [2014-12-27 04:32:47 +0000 UTC]

I think I was just leaving it there for when pro-lifers storm this page.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to SilverBeastLaguz [2014-12-27 04:37:00 +0000 UTC]

Oh alright lol sorry for the misunderstanding. Thanks for the info though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverBeastLaguz In reply to MauEvig [2014-12-27 04:37:42 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xghfthfgxn [2013-11-05 07:33:31 +0000 UTC]

Pro-lifers have a hero-complex. They complain about abortion butΒ take photos of it so they can, in the words of Tony Montana "point their f*cking fingers and say THAT'S THE BAD GUY!"

Β 

Also, you have to question the reasoning of people who possess pictures of naked children drenched in bodily fluids. They remind me of a certain other group of people that only the Vatican would sympathise with.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Crying-Goddess [2013-05-22 19:43:40 +0000 UTC]

O_o wow.............I have no words for that one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JessamineDiane [2012-11-03 19:42:14 +0000 UTC]

Foetuses are butt-ugly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to JessamineDiane [2012-11-04 15:06:49 +0000 UTC]

Ou contrare. Butts are FAR more attractive looking than foetuses. XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JessamineDiane In reply to MauEvig [2012-11-04 18:45:51 +0000 UTC]

XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

generallaserfist [2012-08-14 18:53:34 +0000 UTC]

I hate it when pro lifers use scare tactics like pictures of dead fetuses to make you agree with them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

steinhakasei [2012-03-19 06:01:13 +0000 UTC]

I love the ones who call pro choicers evil, yet exploit miscarriage photos at the expense of the woman who lost that pregnancy. Last I checked, exploiting people wasn't a good thing to do.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to steinhakasei [2012-03-19 23:40:17 +0000 UTC]

Aye, you've got that one right. She's bound to be suffering enough pain as it is losing her baby. *sigh* People...I just don't understand them.

The most people I come across...the more I like my cat.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

steinhakasei In reply to MauEvig [2012-03-20 03:47:59 +0000 UTC]

Haha.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jblask [2012-03-18 04:32:03 +0000 UTC]

Would say that baby is far too developed to be a fetus?

Using someone already dead is extremely questionable. (Uhm... guys?) But that's hardly any real evidence against them. That being said.... it would be smart for them to find a more fitting picture to support their point.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to Jblask [2012-03-18 15:58:44 +0000 UTC]

Exactly what I mean. They use the icon of an already dead fetus to support their point. So yes it would be smart for them to find something else.

Yay we agree on something! XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jblask In reply to MauEvig [2012-03-21 16:33:57 +0000 UTC]

But I gotta admit it's better then the other "Prolife" pics which are meant to be shocking and portray mothers and doctors as monsters that kill babies. <.=.< Which isn't even prolife it's stupid and demonizing. >.=.>

I guess it would be better if they just used CGed image instead or something. they can be pretty convincing.

Oh we agree more on that. We both like Lion King. And I don't even like cats.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverSheCat [2012-03-18 02:02:07 +0000 UTC]

Haha. Funny joke. Abortion

I love how they use the dead fetus XD "OMG IS A FETUS IMA SAVE IT"... its dead, fucktard..........

The whole thing is ridiculous in any case. The way i see it is, if we can put things in (artificial insemination) we can take it out.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Jblask In reply to SilverSheCat [2012-03-18 04:35:57 +0000 UTC]

it's meant more to make the viewer not want to have an abortion not save that one. ya know.

Thaaat being said...yeah... it would be smart if they got a better picture to support their argument. Though funnily enough I've never seen thta image till now.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverSheCat In reply to Jblask [2012-03-18 06:05:37 +0000 UTC]

well of course i know all of that. im just saying lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jblask In reply to SilverSheCat [2012-03-21 16:26:26 +0000 UTC]

So was I.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MauEvig In reply to SilverSheCat [2012-03-18 02:06:43 +0000 UTC]

Exactly! I'm glad someone gets it! ^^

Nice Avatar by the way! ^^

That's also a good point. If the pro-lifers are REALLY all about adoption, then we should get rid of invetro.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverSheCat In reply to MauEvig [2012-03-18 02:33:59 +0000 UTC]

lol

Thanks

yeaaaa buddy :/ i dont even listen to pro-lifers. full of shit.

another thing i like is "if your going to make me have a baby, im going to make you have an abortion."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

LostAtSeaOFF In reply to SilverSheCat [2015-07-18 17:53:41 +0000 UTC]

Y'know what else I don't understand? Fetuses are the most replacable things on the planet yet pro-lifers act like every fetus is the last one to ever be born

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverSheCat In reply to LostAtSeaOFF [2015-07-18 19:27:22 +0000 UTC]

Renewable resources

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LostAtSeaOFF In reply to SilverSheCat [2015-07-18 19:32:05 +0000 UTC]

Yep

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MauEvig In reply to SilverSheCat [2012-03-18 16:02:38 +0000 UTC]

Couldn't have said it better myself!

Of course, it's hard not to listen when they're cranked up at full volume and you're surrounded by it everywhere you go, whether it's bumper stickers, or hearing your family rave on about it. *sigh*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverSheCat In reply to MauEvig [2012-03-18 16:05:24 +0000 UTC]

My mother, thank starclan, is a jebus freak, BUT she is prochoice. Thank starclan for not taking away rights.

I mean cmon, girls fought for equal rights, wether it is to vote or anything else. Now we females are trying to take away our own freedom of choice? It makes me sick.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Seitar [2012-03-18 01:46:44 +0000 UTC]

You might want to make the wording more clear. Using dead fetuses to frighten others and show how horribul!1!!1 abortion is isn't hypocritical, but they're using dead fetuses as if they were alive to represent how precious life is - when, in fact, the pictured 'life' is deceased.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to Seitar [2012-03-18 01:52:11 +0000 UTC]

It's still hypocritical. That's the point of the stamp. I'm referring to the latter part of your statement.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Seitar In reply to MauEvig [2012-03-18 01:57:47 +0000 UTC]

I know you are, but the way you worded it makes it seem otherwise.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to Seitar [2012-03-18 02:02:03 +0000 UTC]

Eh. I couldn't think of any other ways to word it. I was trying to use my usual witty sarcasm, but y'know. XD;

I'll keep that in mind for future stamps.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

1sonichufan [2012-03-18 01:42:31 +0000 UTC]

why is it hypocritical

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to 1sonichufan [2012-03-18 01:46:37 +0000 UTC]

Because if they're pro-life...they shouldn't be using those images as icons and such to illustrate the "so-called" beauty of a developing fetus and discourage people from getting abortions. x.x

Blech.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

1sonichufan In reply to MauEvig [2012-03-18 01:48:35 +0000 UTC]

that's not what they are trying to illustrate, they are trying to illustrate the ugly nature of an abortion that is what you are pulling out of your uterus

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to 1sonichufan [2012-03-18 01:52:25 +0000 UTC]

I'm talking about this...[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

1sonichufan In reply to MauEvig [2012-03-18 01:53:24 +0000 UTC]

oh, well still they just want you to think about what you're doing before you abort it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to 1sonichufan [2012-03-18 01:54:16 +0000 UTC]

Fair enough. Then they shouldn't be using a DEAD fetus to do so. XP
Hence why it's hypocritical.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

1sonichufan In reply to MauEvig [2012-03-18 01:58:01 +0000 UTC]

well they are just trying to show that a dead fetus still looks like a baby, i don't know if it's hypocritical. i doubt they killed the baby in order to take the picture, it was probably aborted by someone else and they took a picture of the fetus in the jar. hypocritical would be them aborting babies when they say they are against abortion

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to 1sonichufan [2012-03-18 02:04:07 +0000 UTC]

Looks more like an alien to me...but then again...babies kind of creep me out anyway...so in my own case...they've actually made their argument even worse in their own favor at least when it comes to me.
*shrugs* To each their own, but I think it's hypocritical to use a dead fetus as an icon. Just saying.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

1sonichufan In reply to MauEvig [2012-03-18 02:07:25 +0000 UTC]

yeah i mean you probably made up your mind before seeing the picture anyway

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MauEvig In reply to 1sonichufan [2012-03-18 02:07:57 +0000 UTC]

Pretty much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0