Comments: 313
DecayingSky In reply to HectorEDefendi [2015-06-25 17:11:20 +0000 UTC]
Bahaha so thats what they are calling us now? It's fine because me and my pro-choice athiest lesbian self isn't going anywhere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IronMandi [2015-01-21 20:23:37 +0000 UTC]
Brother, a wise man once told me, "I can show you God, would you like to see?" I said yes. He smiled, inhaled deeply, smiled, and said, "ah! There He is!"
I wanted to share that story with you, it brought me such joy to hear. I hope this story finds you in wonderful health and happiness, and may Peace be with you always!
Sister Mandi
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Algahiem3 [2014-10-06 21:03:00 +0000 UTC]
You're a very good artist, but how can you be certain if Allah (or any other deity) is the one true God? And if there was any solid proof of Allah existing, why you you waste time worshipping him. If God or in your case, Allah is as vast as the universe itself, why would he pay any attention to you, me or any other creature this speck that we call Planet Earth? Let me put it another way, would pay any attention the needs of amoebas? IMHO, an all powerful god who spends all his time energy on a single planet is like a person who spends his time studying nurturing a speck of dusk. It just doesn't make sense to me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to Algahiem3 [2014-10-07 16:17:42 +0000 UTC]
You're raising some interesting questions, my friend.
"but how can you be certain if Allah (or any other deity) is the one true God?"
I can't possibly answer this big question with just one sentence or a short paragraph. but I tell you that The God almighty provides evidences, in his divine book: the Qur'an, to refute all other deities. if you are interested, please consider reading the Qur'an.
"And if there was any solid proof of Allah existing, why you you waste time worshipping him."
That's because the God almighty commanded us to worship him.
just to make sure you understand what "worship" means in Islam, please have read the following article:
"If God or in your case, Allah is as vast as the universe itself, why would he pay any attention to you, me or any other creature this speck that we call Planet Earth?"
I never said "the God is as vast as the universe". the God is unlike anything he created. so we can't compare him like we compare 2 objects or creatures.
the God almighty pays attention to us simply because he's caring and loving. if he were to create us and leave us alone, that would have meant he's uncaring, right?
now to ask the God almighty "why do you care?" is a little unreasonable. the God cares because caring is one of his divine attributes. he forgives because forgiveness is one of his divine attributes. he's just because justice is one of his divine attributes. that's his nature.
in the Qur'an, the God almighty taught us over 99 attributes from which we can know him. these attributes are called the "beautiful names of the God". they are all in harmony with each other and never contradict one another.
"Let me put it another way, would pay any attention the needs of amoebas? IMHO, an all powerful god who spends all his time energy on a single planet is like a person who spends his time studying nurturing a speck of dusk. It just doesn't make sense to me"
We Muslims never claimed the God spends all his time energy on a single planet. so please correct your facts.
Without correct knowledge about the God almighty, one may make assumptions and may find his assumptions nonsensical or illogical. therefore he finds it hard to believe in such a god. I'm afraid this is not the correct way to learn about the God almighty. we have no means to study the God except through the divine scripture revealed by him. therefore, I advise you to read scripture and try to learn about the God of that scripture. after you have enough knowledge you can argue or discuss details.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Algahiem3 In reply to Nayzak [2014-10-08 18:31:34 +0000 UTC]
Flagged as Spam
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to Algahiem3 [2014-10-10 12:32:16 +0000 UTC]
I'm afraid this comment is to be flagged as spam.
posting links to Anti-islamic websites in my page is forbidden. please check my visitor's guidelines and rules before you comment.
Visitors' GuidelinesAssalaamu alaikum [peace be to you],
Most of my work here has religious theme. and everyone knows that whenever religion is concerned, disagreement and debates arise. there is nothing wrong with disagreements. but when freedom of expression is abused with the lack of manners and good conduct, religious discussions can become quite ugly. and instead of benefiting from our differences and spreading tolerance and peace, we find ourselves spreading hate and widening the gap between us.
In order to keep things in a civilized and respectful manner in my pages, I made these guidelines for the visitors and guests.
Notice that some of these rules may seem a little strict. I was obliged to put them here because I encountered many visitors who used freedom of speech in order to write aggressive comments, hateful opinions and disrespectful statements. these rules aren't here to block people's freedom, but just to guide it in a way that is respectful and beneficial for everybody. if you are a respe
if you want to share links, please do so in your own page.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Algahiem3 In reply to Nayzak [2014-10-10 18:07:51 +0000 UTC]
Flagged as Spam
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to Algahiem3 [2014-10-10 22:07:19 +0000 UTC]
This comment is to be flagged as spam.
I already asked you nicely to read my rules
Visitors' GuidelinesAssalaamu alaikum [peace be to you],
Most of my work here has religious theme. and everyone knows that whenever religion is concerned, disagreement and debates arise. there is nothing wrong with disagreements. but when freedom of expression is abused with the lack of manners and good conduct, religious discussions can become quite ugly. and instead of benefiting from our differences and spreading tolerance and peace, we find ourselves spreading hate and widening the gap between us.
In order to keep things in a civilized and respectful manner in my pages, I made these guidelines for the visitors and guests.
Notice that some of these rules may seem a little strict. I was obliged to put them here because I encountered many visitors who used freedom of speech in order to write aggressive comments, hateful opinions and disrespectful statements. these rules aren't here to block people's freedom, but just to guide it in a way that is respectful and beneficial for everybody. if you are a respe before you comment.
You're mistaken if you're assuming that my page is open for anti-islamic opinions. I'm afraid such trash fits well in your own page.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Melnazar In reply to Nayzak [2015-07-25 01:21:07 +0000 UTC]
Soooooooo.. peolple cannot present counter arguments because you consider it "anti-islam"?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DisplacedSoutherner [2014-09-21 16:06:28 +0000 UTC]
I'm a Roman Catholic and I really like this post. Your art style is adorable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Corvus-the-Snark [2014-04-19 22:19:06 +0000 UTC]
I'm a Christian and I approve of this post
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
greenbank [2014-01-16 02:01:07 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Owner
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to greenbank [2014-01-16 02:26:06 +0000 UTC]
I don't like to see people writing long articles in my page. this is not a forum. this page is for me to write articles, not for every Tom, Dick and Harry to write.
I did write:
"if you don't like my approach or you don't like the way this subject is presented, feel free to write your own article in your own page and express your opinions in the subject."
I don't debate, so go write your disagreement in your own page. your long article here is to be hidden.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
greenbank In reply to Nayzak [2014-01-16 03:47:39 +0000 UTC]
Sorry you thought my reply was long. You are of course free to hide my comments if you don't like them.
However, what I said was not "opinion" but fact; the errors you made were actual errors, not my disagreement with your opinions and assumptions.
I didn't intend to engage in dialogue; what I wanted to do was (a) point out some of the errors in your original piece, and (b) point out where you might go in order to correct them. It is entirely up to you whether you take up this information or not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to greenbank [2014-01-16 05:37:54 +0000 UTC]
"However, what I said was not "opinion" but fact; the errors you made were actual errors, not my disagreement with your opinions and assumptions."
you may call it fact. but I see it as an opinion.
as far as I know, I didn't make errors in the above article. and if I did, then you have a way to prove me wrong: by replying to my article in a scholarly article of your own you write in your own page. you see, it's very easy to disagree. and it's very easy to write disagreement (even nonsensical) on other people's pages. but when it comes to writing something for the world to see on ones own page, many people don't dare. I never said I'm not willing to hear the opposite opinion. but I have no obligation to read a long one in my own page.
"I didn't intend to engage in dialogue; what I wanted to do was (a) point out some of the errors in your original piece, and (b) point out where you might go in order to correct them. It is entirely up to you whether you take up this information or not."
engaging in dialog is fine. it's debates that I'm not interested in. you made your comment look like you were looking for a debate. unfortunately debates take much time and, from my own experience, most of them do not end well. I'm not here to fight or prove myself right and everybody wrong. I'm here to share what I believe is right. everyone is free to agree or disagree.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MrEpicJustice [2014-01-15 18:18:46 +0000 UTC]
Alright lets assume that these points are all valid... how do they prove that it is Allah that is the god in question?
Also why do Theists of all faiths assume Evolution disproves there religions? Evolution has nothing to say about the creation of the universe, or gods, or faiths - or in fact even how life was created, Evolution on explains how life diversifies through natural selection over successive generations to adapt to it's surroundings, which can be observant in taxonomy.
Also your comparing a Dead and non living system that doesn't reproduce ( ie a Call phone) to a living organism, that changes and has offspring that attain new characteristics, ergo are open to gradual changes over successive generations.
or in a TL;DR fashion
Science dose not disprove Gods, it has nothing to say about Gods - because Gods by there definition are untestable and unobservant, ergo outside Science's competence.
( I am NOT a scientist, or even a person that graduated college, so it is possible I butchered more than a few things in these criminally simplified explanations.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
piogd [2013-12-31 21:30:32 +0000 UTC]
Really? Where?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to piogd [2013-12-31 21:38:28 +0000 UTC]
is on his Throne.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
piogd In reply to Nayzak [2013-12-31 23:48:37 +0000 UTC]
Flagged as Spam
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to piogd [2014-01-01 19:58:05 +0000 UTC]
your IQ still didn't reach the adequate level to make sense of adults speech.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MrEpicJustice In reply to Nayzak [2014-01-15 18:11:30 +0000 UTC]
Tsk tsk, you shouldn't silence dissenting opinions :< ( even if you don't think there very inteligent)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to MrEpicJustice [2014-01-15 20:15:37 +0000 UTC]
I do in my page whatever I wish.
and you shouldn't try to dictate to me what I should or shouldn't do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HappyHumanist [2013-12-08 19:43:07 +0000 UTC]
Wow you are one of the most scientifically ignorant person i have ever seen, no wonder why you normally disable comment and refuse to engage in debates.
Your example of the universe only refutes the existence of god, with estimated to have over 32 septillion planets with the vast majority unable to have life on them it is really not that big of a stretch to assume that the perfect organized system (which isn't really perfect at all with all the natural disasters) of earth was simply by chance.
Most planets are unstable, less than 3% of a gas cloud forms a star, literally 99,999999% of the universe will kill life INSTANTLY, the andromeda galaxy will in a billion years destroy our galaxy, the universe will very likely stop expanding and go back into a reverse state known as the big crunch where the entire universe will be devoured and that's ofcourse if we'd even be there to see it before the sun supernova's and murders all life on earth. And even earth itself is incredibly poorly designed. Just look at floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, lightning strikes, volcanos, earthquakes, diseases, extinction, cataclysms, climate shifts, killer astroids and 99% of ALL species who EVER lived is extinct.
I don't know about you but if you actually use this as evidence for your so called god then your god is easily the worst designer i have ever seen, no intelligent benevolent being would create a system where almost everything will literally kill you instantly.
*If something exists, something must have caused it to exists*
This is true, but you seem to forget that there is a massive difference between creatio ex nihilo (causation through nothing) and creatio ex materia (creation through a rearrangement of matter and energy) so you're just making a false equivocation here and therefor your argument fails.
Now you're simply saying. (look at how complex the body is, surely a perfect benevolent god must've made it) ofcourse not only are you dismissing that our bodies are filled with diseases and imperfections a god would never make you are also forgetting the fact that we evolved this way through natural selection which is an unguided process.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HappyHumanist In reply to HappyHumanist [2013-12-08 19:43:17 +0000 UTC]
*There are two options for a cause of this universe:
a- a non intelligent cause: Which means, everything came randomly by chance.
b- an intelligent cause: which means something very intelligent caused this universe to come into existence*
And once again false, you have created a false dichotomy, not every cause that is non-intelligent is random, in fact it's most of the time the exact opposite, natural processes are generally based on algorithms like natural selection.
Then you use terrible anologies, you are comparing artificial creations to natural creations such as comparing a plane to an eye, but that's not how natural selection works, a plane cannot form extra parts by itself and rearrange it's matter, atoms can (nuclear fusion) DNA can (reproduction) and crystalized snow can (natural processes through weather) if you want to scientifically prove god then stop trying to use poor rhetoric.
*We see around us a world so complex that it’s impossible for it to come into existence “just by itself” and then work in a very perfect order. Our universe has an incredible amount of order to it. The cause of such universe “must” be an intelligent cause*
Not exactly, first of all i proved that the universe is far from perfect and second of all complexity does not require an intelligent cause, it requires an algorithmic process based on natural processes (which ARE actually scientifically proven)
Again you're comparing two completely different things, a cellphone is not a natural object, it was not made through natural processes like nuclear fusion, it does not have genes. You literally don't know anything about science do you?
So all in all you have not scientifically or rationally proven god, you're a liar, an irrational con-artist trying to shove propaganda on this site. Study biology or physics before you even attempt to talk about any of this and if you have any shred of dignity then i dare you to refute my points
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Abbx901 In reply to HappyHumanist [2014-03-16 10:15:39 +0000 UTC]
I'm just a fan of debate and picking the less-popular side, so here goes something:
1. Islam might not even go against evolution, though it's an idea universally unaccepted. There's a verse in the Quran that says that all life came from water, listing it down in the exact order or something. Sounds rather vague-ish, but then again, it's not a science text-book.
2. The universe isn't imperfect.
i. There are certain benefits to these 'natural disasters' e.g. lava brings up fertile soil to the ground. Hurricanes distribute rain. Architecture can be made to withstand disasters. Japan receives majority of its rain from typhoons. The Hurricane Camille was a blessing in disguise as it spurred redevelopment. This increased local property values. If you think about it, this is pretty impressive.
ii. The human mind is flawed itself, but for a reason. It is to actively test you by making you act against an innate evil, e.g. greed or sloth. Likewise, the world itself is flawed. For a reason. To encourage vigilance, knowledge, and so on... Also it stops you from being stupid e.g. jumping into a tub of ice naked. Innate flaws -> moral sharpness. Wordly flaws -> wordly sharpness. A wordly sharpness that might benefit that same world.
3. Sometimes, I think, what are the things that aren't explained by science, but just are? E.g. the procession of time. We could very easily have time that passes through so quickly that the sun would have risen and set in the blink of an eye or something. Some things are pretty inexplicable. There could also have been one fruit that provided all the nourishment needed, but instead there are billions of species of not only plants, but animals. Aesthetic value. Inscribed in the world itself. There's stuff that is conveniently and beneficially present, however it didn't spring out of any 'need' as evolution says.
4. You insulted another person because you disagreed with him. That was annoying, and made you look like a pompous dickhead.
5. Nice arguments, in any case.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CoolLittleDude In reply to HappyHumanist [2014-03-03 23:37:12 +0000 UTC]
I guess he doesn't have a shred of dignity, anyway nice argument. I've gotten into a debate similar to this only it's was about the morality and logic of submitting to an all powerful being that hasn't appeared to humans in over 2000 years.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LadyFemmeFatale [2013-10-04 03:20:22 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Commenter
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to LadyFemmeFatale [2013-10-04 05:02:53 +0000 UTC]
You are wrong. the God is GENDERLESS. he is neither male nor female. and no science can arguments that God is male. that's nonsense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
DreamLandWarrior In reply to Nayzak [2014-01-06 18:46:43 +0000 UTC]
Besides my cousins, you are the first person to have ever said that!
Hurray for genderless God!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LiverofReanhay [2013-09-19 14:22:10 +0000 UTC]
I have yet to find a logical argument as to their being no god, or as to there being a god, one hasn't deducted the logical alternatives to the claim that their is one.
Actually you can't scientifically prove or disprove the existence of god.(such science hasn't been invented yet I suppose)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to LiverofReanhay [2013-09-19 17:42:43 +0000 UTC]
"one hasn't deducted the logical alternatives to the claim that their is one."
you failing to find something doesn't everybody else failed.
"Actually you can't scientifically prove or disprove the existence of god.(such science hasn't been invented yet I suppose)"
Please talk about yourself. and don't attribute your failure to me. I proved God's existence scientifically and logically and rationally. and that's why I believe it him. so if you couldn't do that, it doesn't mean nobody could. it only means your lacking something and you need to search more.
the science you claim hasn't been invented yet is already there. it's called common sense.
peace
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LiverofReanhay In reply to Nayzak [2013-09-20 07:33:47 +0000 UTC]
I gave a detailed response,–· from memory·–·there is no reason it shouldn't be satisfactory.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to LiverofReanhay [2013-09-20 23:12:07 +0000 UTC]
the question isn't whether it's satisfactory or not. your "detailed" response doesn't (and can't) prove there is no God.
so I don't know what you're trying to prove here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Red-Jirachi-2 [2013-09-16 11:02:52 +0000 UTC]
How can you prove or disprove God exists when His presence causes you to EXPLODE
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to Red-Jirachi-2 [2013-09-16 12:36:26 +0000 UTC]
Did you see me exploding?
your question makes no sense since God's presence DOES NOT cause me to explode.
peace.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Red-Jirachi-2 In reply to Nayzak [2013-09-17 08:31:04 +0000 UTC]
It's a Biblical reference. Anyone who sees God's face will die from the sheer power of Him. God is meant to look incomprehensible to mortals, like a benevolent Yog-Sothoth
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to Red-Jirachi-2 [2013-09-17 12:45:30 +0000 UTC]
Well, I don't believe in the Bible. I see it pointless to ask me a question basing on what Biblical followers believe.
In Islam, we do believe no human saw (can see) God's face. simply because he created us in earthly bodies with physical limitations. but we do believe that in the hereafter, we will be resurrected in a different body which may have the ability to see the God.
but not being able to see God's face doesn't mean we reject his existence. we believe in the God because of the tremendous signs (that point to him) which he created all around us.
peace
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Red-Jirachi-2 In reply to Nayzak [2013-09-18 23:01:07 +0000 UTC]
That's what I mean by the Yog-Sothoth comparison: God is outside space and time, and thus it's impossible to describe how He looks. A lot of the time that causes the human mind to go insane
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nayzak In reply to Red-Jirachi-2 [2013-09-18 23:59:33 +0000 UTC]
yes. that's why it's pointless for us humans to try and imagine how the God is. besides, what we imagine may not be the truth: the God is not who we want him to be. he is who he is.
so that the God doesn't give us much trouble imagining him, and so that we won't go astray by imagining him in the wrong way, he sent prophets and messengers to us with scripture that defines clearly what God is and what he is not. so, for us Muslims, we return to the divine scripture when we want to know God's attributes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ssjdah [2013-08-10 22:21:49 +0000 UTC]
Here is little tip Bro :
Try NOT to use the intelligent design argument in proving God's existence
Cheeers
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheBrilliantFool [2013-07-29 07:29:08 +0000 UTC]
Nicely done. It's well set out, even if I don't agree with some of the logic.
I'm simply curious, are you 100% convinced that Allah and his teachings are factually, objectively true? Do you think it possible that perhaps another religion may be correct, or that there is no God? If you can ask that others consider that they may be incorrect, surely you should do so too?
Also, do you believe that faith plays no part in your belief? Had you been raised agnostic say (if you weren't), would you likely still have found Islam to be objectively factual?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Outlawcarl [2013-07-26 02:19:20 +0000 UTC]
Why couldn't of God made us by evolution?
I kept rewriting this so as not to rant, i just have to ask why god diced to make chimpanzees 96% in his image.
Speaking of image the girls good but man i love arabic calligraphy
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>