Comments: 17
LuciferZillyhoo [2008-10-09 04:50:41 +0000 UTC]
Wow! I really like these weapon profiles, and I just figured out why. They look like concept art out of a game, the one that springs to mind is Far Cry 2.
Timberwolf is a great name, in my humble opinion, though not as BA as Mjolnir. I'll be watching for more images like these!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nolo84 In reply to LuciferZillyhoo [2008-10-09 05:11:15 +0000 UTC]
Haha, thanks.
I am good at names, for some reason.
Though definitely the best one I've ever came up with was "Zephyr" for a caliber.
This rifle was named "Timberwolf" to match the other weapons that have frames like this, all named after animals. "Wolverine", "Lynx", etc.
I really wish I didn't have the desire to name everything the "Wolverine".
It's just a great image.
I love wolverines.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Centrist [2007-12-01 09:19:05 +0000 UTC]
I would totally buy that gun, but only if it had two things that I feel are missing in the latest generation of guns.
Where are the picatinny rails and why no adjustable stock? Holographic sights are great and easily fit on rails and smaller people (especially women and children) and people wearing body armor would greatly appreciate an adjustable stock.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Akrotatos In reply to Centrist [2008-01-02 19:53:29 +0000 UTC]
i only rely on my iron sights optics suck and are easily distorted
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nolo84 In reply to Akrotatos [2008-01-05 18:15:32 +0000 UTC]
I, too, am an iron sight man. I hate scopes. But I recognize that people do like optics, so I usually incorporate some way of mounting them.
My general theory is that (unless you're a sniper) if you can't see it with your iron sights, it's too far away anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Akrotatos In reply to Nolo84 [2008-01-05 23:27:49 +0000 UTC]
not just scopes but red dots and the like, they are a better replacement for match sights and are much easier to acquire the target, but i hear a lot about people bumping them and taking off the zero and then not being able to shoot straight.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nolo84 In reply to Akrotatos [2008-01-06 02:33:19 +0000 UTC]
I think if you used a really solid mount, it'd be okay.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Akrotatos In reply to Nolo84 [2008-01-06 03:31:20 +0000 UTC]
its also the optic itself
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nolo84 In reply to Akrotatos [2008-01-06 03:36:26 +0000 UTC]
I see.
Well, I like irons anyway, so no skin off my back!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nolo84 In reply to Centrist [2007-12-01 12:16:45 +0000 UTC]
Ummm... "Pivs" is supposed to be "Pics."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nolo84 In reply to Centrist [2007-12-01 12:15:16 +0000 UTC]
I really only draw the base version of a weapon. I've already planned a version with Pivs and an adjustable stock. Use your imagination for now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Centrist In reply to Nolo84 [2007-12-02 01:52:16 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I'll remember that and remind myself when viewing your future work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nolo84 In reply to Centrist [2007-12-02 02:45:07 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I just draw to remind myself what something looks like when I move on to other projects, really. It has nothing to do with expression.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Keti [2007-12-01 04:53:08 +0000 UTC]
Now it's even cooler. Woot, I gots an assluat rifel named aftar meh.
If I ever take up the gunmaking trade, I'll just have to make one like this, if for nothing else, then for the epic win that would necessarily ensue.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nolo84 In reply to Keti [2007-12-01 12:16:01 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I figured you'd like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0