Comments: 25
WToosey [2015-07-21 10:21:42 +0000 UTC]
Very interesting and unusual ceratopsian and I also doubt that it was a swimming dinosaur. Some primitive ceratopsians such as Protoceratops also had spines on the caudal vertebrae that were quite tall, giving it a deep tail and that dinosaur wasn't a swimmer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
M4IAN [2014-01-21 00:35:30 +0000 UTC]
I can see why you are skeptical . There are no fins on bottom of the tail, so it can't be made for swimming.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ProcrastinatingStill In reply to M4IAN [2014-09-03 23:50:36 +0000 UTC]
Some aquatic animals only had a top fin (early Ichthyosaurs).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
articfoxice [2013-02-20 04:42:35 +0000 UTC]
it looks like it would have difficulty taking breaths with those nostrils.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vinhavatar [2012-08-12 13:54:49 +0000 UTC]
If it's an underwater swimming dino, duh, looks dumb.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Flishstar [2012-07-23 00:57:51 +0000 UTC]
I find it unlikely it was used for swimming, Dinosaurs tails were too stiff to be used for swimming except in the most primitive theropods.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to Flishstar [2012-07-24 02:33:17 +0000 UTC]
I agree...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gegart [2011-02-18 10:10:35 +0000 UTC]
I'm skeptical too
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ryivhnn [2010-12-16 05:28:55 +0000 UTC]
Hippokoreaceratopsosamus! It looks cool hypothetically amphibious, the bubbles are a cute touch.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riotgirlckb [2010-12-06 23:13:34 +0000 UTC]
very nice impression i like it
yeah im a bit skeptical about the swimming thing it could be a display mechanism so who knows
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Boverisuchus [2010-12-04 09:55:54 +0000 UTC]
I say, if the ecology suggests so, why not? Leptoceratops lived in swampy country too...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vimark [2010-11-30 15:53:33 +0000 UTC]
Nice colors! I like it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BullDan [2010-11-28 16:17:50 +0000 UTC]
i don't know about this...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cephlaken [2010-11-28 05:39:08 +0000 UTC]
I know this ceratopsian dude it's from my country.... although I am also very, very skeptical of the swimming part... I think there was also another hilariously inaccurate reconstruction of swimming basal ceratopisans...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to Cephlaken [2010-11-29 01:09:25 +0000 UTC]
I haven't seen any other reconstruction of a swimming ceratopsian yet...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The-Episiarch [2010-11-28 05:32:15 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I'm pretty skeptical too. I read Ford and Martin (2010) "A semi-aquatic life habitat for Psittacosaurus" and it seems that they did a lot of selective interpretation of traits which are also found in fully-terrestrial animals, and the suggestion that this guy was semi-aquatic might be considered as a fall-out from that. It feels a bit like the "Aquatic Ape Hypothesis" all over again...
You might have already read this, but there was an interesting debate/discussion on that very issue on the When Pigs Fly blog here: [link]
They really need further evidence from isotope studies similar to this:
Liu, A.G., Seiffert, E.R., Simons, E.L. (2008) Stable isotope evidence for an amphibious phase in early proboscidean evolution. PNAS 105(15): 5786-5791.
or this:
Amiot R., et al. (2010) Oxygen isotope evidence for semi-aquatic habits among spinosaurid theropods. Geology 38(2): 139-142
To be convincing... which I noticed has already been suggested by Brian Switek: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to The-Episiarch [2010-11-29 01:10:17 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I totally agree with you...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tassietyger [2010-11-28 04:47:30 +0000 UTC]
Well I find it not so shocking, consider this group were more in vain to artiodactyls (in terms of diverse ecology) as whole than to rhinos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to tassietyger [2010-11-29 01:11:52 +0000 UTC]
I think the evidences presented for an amphibious lifestyle are a bit ...light.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tassietyger In reply to NTamura [2010-11-29 03:18:18 +0000 UTC]
I'm not saying this was some water cherovitan ceratopsian, I'm just saying that it's possible that it could occur and that the lifestyles were more akin to artiodactlys: small ceratopsians were like pigs, small deer and/or small antelope. And most ceratopsids were probably more like the larger species of antelope or deer in terms of ecology and lifestyle than what people assume these dinosaurs as dino-rhinos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to tassietyger [2010-11-29 19:19:18 +0000 UTC]
I see your point...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0