HOME | DD

omagnas — A Long Time

Published: 2006-11-25 05:34:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 1643; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Growing tired with anticipation, eventually drifting off into my own space...


This exposure was approximately 2.5 hours long, about half an hour longer than I was planning. I ended up falling asleep in a chair, resulting in my camera going dead, but I was still able to get a fairly decent exposure. This was taken from my backyard. Curves and levels editing done in photoshop, and some saturation adjustments too.
Related content
Comments: 49

pvmarrero [2009-02-14 08:13:37 +0000 UTC]

To KROHN27:I made my own remote look it up on instructables.com. type canon remote in the search field at the top of the page, there real easy to make

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hechser [2008-12-19 18:12:53 +0000 UTC]

Worth the wait i'd say. An interesting and conceptual shot.

It's a great way of realising how the lighting really does change around you. Using the physical world to give you beauty.

Very nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to Hechser [2008-12-20 12:28:44 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much, i appreciate the comment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hechser In reply to omagnas [2008-12-20 22:18:44 +0000 UTC]

No problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aperturephoto [2007-12-29 07:46:38 +0000 UTC]

Great shot! I'm wondering if there was an issue with the image being over-exposed before working it in PS? Maybe I'm just unable to find a dark enough location to achieve the right exposure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to Aperturephoto [2007-12-29 16:43:53 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hotwir3 [2007-07-19 09:29:45 +0000 UTC]

nice work. especially with using digital. im impressed with the lack of amp burn. if the camera went dead, as you say, how did it manage to save the image? ive always wondered how long a full D80's battery would last me on a long exposure. obviously keeping the ISO to a minimum would extend it to a large degree.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to hotwir3 [2007-07-19 12:47:29 +0000 UTC]

thank you! i'm not too sure how the image saved, but the shutter was set to bulb and when i went out and shut it off, i didn't hear the shutter close and the camera was off. i'm just glad it turned out

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PrometheanPenguin [2007-04-10 13:38:24 +0000 UTC]

great capture man

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to PrometheanPenguin [2007-04-11 00:36:37 +0000 UTC]

thanks alot, im glad you like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

uNiverSus88 [2007-02-05 22:38:43 +0000 UTC]

fanstastic and wonderful !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to uNiverSus88 [2007-02-06 02:28:40 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AssCrackJenny [2007-01-22 07:43:19 +0000 UTC]

thats really cool ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to AssCrackJenny [2007-01-22 08:55:50 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much, im glad you like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hector42 [2007-01-02 17:31:04 +0000 UTC]

I like the longer trails.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to Hector42 [2007-01-03 00:04:00 +0000 UTC]

thank you, i really wanna try this again now that i have a remote shutter release for my newer camera

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hector42 In reply to omagnas [2007-01-03 02:07:44 +0000 UTC]

How did you do that without it? Exposure mode "T" (or is it called "X"?? ...whatever...a mode where you press and release the trigger once to begin the exposure und do the same to end it)?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to Hector42 [2007-01-03 02:17:15 +0000 UTC]

i used my older camera (canon digital rebel) which i have a remote shutter release for, unfortunately it doesn't work with my 30D. then when using it, you set the shutter speed to 'bulb' which allows you to keep the shutter open for as long as you like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hector42 In reply to omagnas [2007-01-03 03:01:42 +0000 UTC]

Yes, on older cameras like the Nikon FE this setting is called "B" ... however this other shutter speed setting is useful too, you don't need the remote shutter release with that...but obviously not all cams feature that. :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to Hector42 [2007-01-03 15:07:25 +0000 UTC]

ah i see. i've only got into photography over the past 2 years, so as of now i'm really only familiar with my cameras. but the remote does help for keeping the cam steady which is a big help. how does that setting work without the remote?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hector42 In reply to omagnas [2007-01-03 17:36:23 +0000 UTC]

Yes...there is an advantage and a disadvantage about that remote release. The advantage is, that it's a little bit more steady, the disadvantage is that if you have a looong remote release, the wind pulls at it, making it eventually less steady because it starts to swing.
The other setting starts the exopsure when you push the trigger and ends it when you push it again. However, you have to touch the cam at least to end the exposure (the beginnig can be triggered by time mechanics (or electronics )).

Looks like I'm not familiar with other cameras too *lol*. I assumed that every newer cam had that feature.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to Hector42 [2007-01-04 01:07:01 +0000 UTC]

haha, thats ok. its sounds as though that would be quite a handy feature though

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TRBPhotographyLLC [2006-12-20 23:04:21 +0000 UTC]

Impressive!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to TRBPhotographyLLC [2006-12-21 01:07:30 +0000 UTC]

thank you, and thanks for faving it too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MountainPsyche [2006-12-20 05:42:23 +0000 UTC]

damn!!! lengthy exposure!!! gotta love the fact that you have no noise... grrr.... nikon d100...(noise producing king)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to MountainPsyche [2006-12-20 14:41:39 +0000 UTC]

haha, thanks alot man! ya i hear nikon's are pretty noisey, ah well there's ways around that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gooddeed89 [2006-12-03 16:10:31 +0000 UTC]

wow long exposure. you said the camera went dead? you mean the battery died?
really nice shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to gooddeed89 [2006-12-04 01:19:54 +0000 UTC]

yeah, my battery went dead, but it got a good exposure in the mean time! thanks for taking a look

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

spinklefinkle [2006-12-03 16:01:21 +0000 UTC]

Amazing shot. Love the colors.
How did you get the stars to look like there on an angle?
Check out some of my star trails.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to spinklefinkle [2006-12-04 01:18:29 +0000 UTC]

thank you. i think either my tripod was on a slight angle, or it could be from the lens which can distort things, because of it's really wide-angle. i'll go check out your photos right now!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

spinklefinkle In reply to omagnas [2006-12-04 02:25:09 +0000 UTC]

THat's good to know. the angel is amazing and I need to figure out how this worked so can try it one day with the angle.
Great job

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to spinklefinkle [2006-12-04 12:52:22 +0000 UTC]

no problem man, i could hardly frame the shot cos of the darkness but i think the 10mm lens warped the sky a bit. thanks again, and good luck on your attempts!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KROHN27 [2006-12-03 05:25:01 +0000 UTC]

I have a Rebel as well, but how did you get the shutter to 2.5 hrs? did you put it on bulb and hold it that long lol?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to KROHN27 [2006-12-03 12:54:07 +0000 UTC]

yes, you set it to bulb, but you need a remote shutter release which acts as your shutter button. it plugs into the side of the camera and is basically a shutter button on a cord, but it can lock open, allowing you to keep the shutter open as long as you like. thanks for taking a look!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KROHN27 In reply to omagnas [2006-12-03 18:09:23 +0000 UTC]

oh cool, do they have them at most camera shops? because i think i need one lol.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to KROHN27 [2006-12-04 01:20:48 +0000 UTC]

i would imagine so, they're really handy even for infrared shots and other long exposures where you don't want any camera shake.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TerraRhapsody [2006-11-26 01:08:27 +0000 UTC]

wow! amazing capture. i do love long exposure photography. showing it with stars looks awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to TerraRhapsody [2006-11-26 08:40:51 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TerraRhapsody In reply to omagnas [2006-11-26 13:27:13 +0000 UTC]

welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jchsoad [2006-11-25 15:57:20 +0000 UTC]

nice dude, fell asleep that's funny. great shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to jchsoad [2006-11-25 23:52:52 +0000 UTC]

thanks man! yeah, luckily inside though, it would've been cold out there

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jchsoad In reply to omagnas [2006-11-26 02:41:51 +0000 UTC]

oh come on you haven't polar beared?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

o-p [2006-11-25 14:44:03 +0000 UTC]

Excellent pic.. 2.5 hour exposure is nice . I will test if I can take pics like this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to o-p [2006-11-25 23:54:54 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much! its very fun to take these images, good luck!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

clarencewret [2006-11-25 11:35:40 +0000 UTC]

amazing picture

love the 2.5 hour exposure

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to clarencewret [2006-11-25 12:39:17 +0000 UTC]

thanks very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AlwaysThinkingPhoto [2006-11-25 07:19:59 +0000 UTC]

Daaamn dude. That's one long ass exposure. It's about time you did some more.

This one looks all bent and warped Crazy effect the long ass exposure did.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

omagnas In reply to AlwaysThinkingPhoto [2006-11-25 12:38:52 +0000 UTC]

thanks alot man!! yeah, i've always wanted to do a really long exposure, so finally got it done. it's all warped looking because i used my 10mm ultra-wide lens.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlwaysThinkingPhoto In reply to omagnas [2006-11-26 18:54:46 +0000 UTC]

Aaah, I see. Yeah a lens like that will do it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0