HOME | DD

oobidoobi β€” Danny Daddy of Dani

Published: 2013-06-05 15:40:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 20859; Favourites: 197; Downloads: 35
Redirect to original
Description Random doodle- I can't remember what started it for the life of me, but if you follow the arrows, its fairly easy to read... I think.

Dani can't be a 'clone' of Danny because clones, by their definition (or at least MY definition) are exact genetic copies. Dani has at least half of her genetics differing. XY and XX tend to be somewhat different.

And I think the rest is a culmination of FFictions.

Danny/Dani Phantom © Butch
Related content
Comments: 86

oobidoobi In reply to ??? [2020-07-18 19:23:09 +0000 UTC]

Well thank ya

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PINK-samiam In reply to oobidoobi [2020-07-20 04:18:36 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MasterBrattan [2019-09-15 16:16:28 +0000 UTC]

Well, this is how it works with Wolverine and X-23.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 2

Omni-gun In reply to MasterBrattan [2020-04-17 00:31:19 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

oobidoobi In reply to MasterBrattan [2019-09-21 13:17:12 +0000 UTC]

True.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

InnerBeast325 [2017-08-14 19:01:51 +0000 UTC]

Most clones end up female, because females are more stable due to having two x-chromosomes, rather than one, but it would still count as a child in a way, being a form of artificial asexual reproduction, considering Dani came out younger. Picture it as Vlad taking two copies of Danny's x-chromosomes, rather than an x and a y, and merging them to create Dani.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Rechte In reply to InnerBeast325 [2017-10-06 23:16:29 +0000 UTC]

Or Vlad took the X chromosome from Fenton and the Y chromosome from Phantom. Since everything is reversed, a ghost Y Chromosome doubles as a human X chromosome, leading to Dani

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

InnerBeast325 In reply to Rechte [2017-10-10 20:01:53 +0000 UTC]

...I am not sure it works that way. The science is less...explained, and Word of God has it that he essentially becomes a different species.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

oobidoobi In reply to InnerBeast325 [2017-08-17 05:25:32 +0000 UTC]

Good enough.

Hell-Β I'd accept "Because I said so," so just about anything is good enough xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Haunton [2015-12-29 05:30:37 +0000 UTC]

Just imagine what would happen if Dani came running into school looking for Danny? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜…πŸ˜ last one is me trying to keep a straight face and almost failing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AnimationCrazed [2015-10-05 00:20:54 +0000 UTC]

I though she was a girl because Vlad accidentally got some of Sam's DNA...?
And why is Sam punching a wall?!
Still, good points altogether. I used to think that would work, too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to AnimationCrazed [2015-10-05 00:41:02 +0000 UTC]

*shrug* Iunno what the canon reasoning is- I made a whole other shtick for it in here.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AnimationCrazed In reply to oobidoobi [2015-10-05 00:54:24 +0000 UTC]

When I got back into the fandom, I started looking at all of the points, asked my Uncle Martin, and read some old programming sheets, and decided the point being would say that Danny and Sam would be Dani's parents in another parallel.
(BTW, my uncle knows Hartman. That's how I got program sheets for the characters.)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to AnimationCrazed [2015-10-05 01:45:42 +0000 UTC]

Ah- that would explain things.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AnimationCrazed In reply to oobidoobi [2015-10-07 00:38:42 +0000 UTC]

ME: Blah, blah, blah, blah....
YOU: Uh-huh.
I know I'm a bit of a talker, sorry! but it does make sense, doesn't it?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to AnimationCrazed [2017-03-27 15:35:58 +0000 UTC]

Oh, it does- no worries.

But Dani is under a different set of circumstances in this 'un

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AnimationCrazed In reply to oobidoobi [2017-05-03 01:38:39 +0000 UTC]

It logics then it doesn't XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

0mura2 [2015-09-22 07:03:51 +0000 UTC]

And with that, Danny is now a father

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Haunton [2015-09-22 05:22:11 +0000 UTC]

Is Danny even able to reproduce normally though sex or not?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Haunton [2015-09-22 08:58:11 +0000 UTC]

That comes later... I think.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Haunton In reply to oobidoobi [2015-09-22 10:41:49 +0000 UTC]

Never know unless you try but that would cause a paradox wouldn't it as no living can make love to a ghostΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Haunton [2015-09-22 18:06:30 +0000 UTC]

Iunno. You sure?

I've seen things man. Internet things.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Xenomaster [2015-07-25 11:39:40 +0000 UTC]

I got it! I know how the genetics work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Xenomaster [2015-07-25 14:29:04 +0000 UTC]

Great! It's only a vague, myth-like concept for me!

(Okay, that's a lie, but I haven't studied it since Biology back in high school)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to oobidoobi [2015-07-25 14:51:35 +0000 UTC]

Here's my theory: when a halfa breeds/cross-clones with a ghost or a human, the genetics mixes with that specific half. Dani's Ghost half Desiree while her human half is 100% Danny and vice versa with the human half and the other hosts. The human side can also be dominate when it comes to the aesthetics, a god way to explain why Dani looks like Danny while her sisters look like their mothers.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Xenomaster [2015-07-25 15:34:08 +0000 UTC]

And "god" explains: Because I wanted it so.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to oobidoobi [2015-07-25 15:38:59 +0000 UTC]

Is my idea sound?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Xenomaster [2015-07-25 18:52:08 +0000 UTC]

Eh.

Good enough. *shrug*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to oobidoobi [2015-07-25 19:25:44 +0000 UTC]

I think it makes sense

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

blues32 [2015-04-14 19:25:13 +0000 UTC]

A genetically altered clone is still a clone. The same basic DNA is used. That's like saying X-23 of Marvel isn't a clone of Wolverine. It's just X-1 to X-22 were all male clones and they all failed.

Still, the idea of her being a form of offspring isn't TOO far off. In fact, Dani's genetic deterioration isn't far off either. The first cloned sheep had issues too. Just...not in that it melted.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to blues32 [2015-04-14 19:33:07 +0000 UTC]

All perfectly arguable and legitimate takes on the whole issue.

I just, ah... I never really cared enough to argue about semantics and whatnot~

"Little rule63!Danny see bigger canon!Danny as daddy, and the two terms can be easily interchangeable."
Which... Explains everything I drew, if oversimplified. With a little help- *hides large syringe of OOC injection*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Antihero-Oookami [2014-07-09 04:11:52 +0000 UTC]

When I first heard about the idea of just considering Dani as Danny's daughter, I just said" yeah, let's go with that."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spiderxand [2014-06-21 08:26:45 +0000 UTC]

I've always theorized that as well! It's in my x-over Danny Phantom of the Opera.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to spiderxand [2014-06-21 13:16:49 +0000 UTC]

Lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

spiderxand In reply to oobidoobi [2014-06-21 23:52:10 +0000 UTC]

You can read it, if you want to.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to spiderxand [2014-06-22 00:58:09 +0000 UTC]

What am I reading again? ._.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

spiderxand In reply to oobidoobi [2014-06-22 02:07:47 +0000 UTC]

Danny Phantom of the Opera. A x-over with Danny Phantom and the Phantom of the Opera

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to spiderxand [2014-06-22 02:39:08 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah-

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Xenomaster [2014-05-20 15:36:49 +0000 UTC]

I see your logic behind this



I like it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Xenomaster [2014-05-20 18:50:30 +0000 UTC]

Good! I think.

Logic is evil, though.I must fix!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to oobidoobi [2014-05-20 18:54:10 +0000 UTC]

Who says evil is bad? *eyes glow yellow*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Xenomaster [2014-05-20 18:56:48 +0000 UTC]

Websters, I think.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to oobidoobi [2014-05-20 19:06:39 +0000 UTC]

Websters?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Xenomaster [2014-05-20 21:18:16 +0000 UTC]

Dictionary.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to oobidoobi [2014-05-20 21:19:47 +0000 UTC]

Well... GOOD IS DUMB

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Xenomaster [2014-05-20 21:29:47 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to oobidoobi [2014-05-21 05:24:09 +0000 UTC]

You agree?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Xenomaster [2014-05-21 06:03:10 +0000 UTC]

I think so- honestly forgot what the opinion was xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to oobidoobi [2014-05-21 08:10:26 +0000 UTC]

Evil is awesome, good is dumb

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

oobidoobi In reply to Xenomaster [2014-05-21 14:15:34 +0000 UTC]

O right.

Well, obviously. Everyone knows that good is comprised of morons unless they consist of ex-evil.

Rules of Maleficent, there.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>