HOME | DD
Party9999999 — Morpheus on Sexism
#abuse #activism #anti #civilrights #cultural #denial #deny #domestic #feminism #feminist #feminists #humour #internet #justice #left #leftist #leftwingpolitics #lefty #marxism #matrix #meme #mens #mistreatment #morpheus #mra #politcal #progess #reactionary #rights #rightwing #sexism #social #socialjustice #society #violence #warrior #wing #women #womensrights #internetmeme #mras #rightist #sjw #whatifitoldyou #socialprogress #culturalmarxism #matrixmeme #mensrights #sjws #socialjusticewarriors #morpheusmeme #whatifitoldyoumeme #socialjusticewarrior #right #antifeminism #discriminate #discriminating #discrimination #discriminatory #domesticabuse #domesticviolence #feminazi #antifeminazi #mensrightsactivism
Published: 2015-07-28 21:14:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 8792; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description
Morpheus does the unthinkable on the internet.Related content
Comments: 122
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
👍: 3 ⏩: 0
What if I told you....
That sexism against men happens, whether you wanna believe it or not.
👍: 4 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Please go campaign against it in the middle east where it's actually happening..
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
"campaign against it in the middle east where it's actually happening.."
Weinstein don't real!
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Please Fuck off if you can’t reply then, you worthless leftist troll fuckwit who wants free shit at the expense of others backs.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
"Please Fuck off if you can’t reply then"
You came to my page mate, you've no right to tell me to fuck off.
No argument against the abuses of Weinstein and 100s more like then. Just wanna whine about abuses happening thousands of miles away.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Yeah, you mention something that isn’t relevant nor contributes to a mythical rape culture, this is a corporate whorebag of a man due to corporate hollywierd whose karma has come to haunt him.
If there is a rape culture, to the Middle East and bitch about it there, you and all other leftists need to go fuck off with your mythical nonsense, I come to your page lol you to get slapped back into the real world where communism nor socialism work..
Feminism is fraud, SJWs, Karl Marx, Communism, Socialism, it’s all a fraud.
I came to your page to tell you “Wake up and smell the coffee farmed by hard working people that earn CAPITAL for it”.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
"isn’t relevant nor contributes to a mythical rape culture"
So lots of men sexually abusing women for years isn't relevant when talking about rape.
By the by there are leftists actually fighting in the middle east with the Kurds.
"I came to your page to tell you “Wake up and smell the coffee farmed by hard working people that earn CAPITAL for it”.
But you didn't say that. You whined about feminism.
Shame that capitalists take most of the value working people create from their labour.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Men are sexually assaulted by women and other men, doesn’t mean women are victims of a mythical rape culture nice jumping to dumb conclusions and fucking composition fallacy there bud.
You confuse capitalists with corporatists, a typical conflation fallacy as usual.
Value is SUBJECTIVE KIDDO, always was and always will be hence why capitalists are more productive than communists or socialists.
The members of a work place need an incentive to keep striving based on equal rights under the law, equal chance under proper education and meritocracy, nor forced equity in outcomes.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Men are sexually abused far less than women and the face it our society fails to deal with it.
"You confuse capitalists with corporatists"
A distinction without a difference. Capitalists create corporations so they can make even greater profits
No value comes from the amount of labour needed to create.
"proper education and meritocracy"
Something capitalist doesn't give. Why do you think a moron like Trump is a as rich and power as he is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Corporatism is when an expanded government joins forces with corporations, nothing to do with capitalism.. not the same thing, so you claimed I made a “distinction without a difference”, so you lie, conflate and falsely accuse others of empty arguments as a Freudian projection, grow the fuck up kid.
”Men are sexually abused far less that’s women” is debunked when you look at gay rape, lesbian rape, those who get prison raped(including the fellas who are imprisoned for being falsely accused, but you ignore that part because it slowly debunks your narrative like a neocon denies climate science), woman on man, man on woman, gang rapes of all these kinds and how the statistics constantly fluctuate, then factor in marxist and feminists lying in the academic fields, they should both be treated with a universal suffrage activism..
“Something capitalist doesn’t give. Why do you think a moron like Trump is as rich an power as he is?”
That whole sentence was fucking awful, it’s riddled with so many grammar errors and such poor wording that I had to reread it four times to get what you’re saying..
I’m not a grammar Nazi, but when commie cunts who need to be verbally scorched with hellfire like you have such bad linguistic skill it requires rereading more than twice, you need to get educated on how to structure a sentence and learn about the REAL FUCKING WORLD KID.
You’re using one of the elite to back up your empty argument when he’s A CORPORATIST BILLIONAIRE, so he’s a fucking dope in many areas and smart in some is really all you’re proving..
Don’t throw in the “one million dollar” bullshit, you’d have to know how to turn one million into billions... via the laissez-faire meritocracy or the corporate method, knowing how he is, probably did the latter later on to expand himself..
Your arguments are terrible, use better arguments and use evidence, you’ve yet to debunk a single thing I said..
It’s not ad hominem to call you a commie cunt when you go spewing commie propaganda bullshit, which you clearly are.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Corporatism is when an expanded government joins forces with corporations, nothing to do with capitalism."
The Government is tool of the ruling class to shape society, Our current government were formed to work in the interests of the capitalist class after the destruction of feudalism.
"”Men are sexually abused far less that’s women” is debunked when you look at gay rape, lesbian rape, those who get prison raped(including the fellas who are imprisoned for being falsely accused, but you ignore that part because it slowly debunks your narrative like a neocon denies climate science), woman on man, man on woman, gang rapes of all these kinds and how the statistics constantly fluctuate, then factor in marxist and feminists lying in the academic fields, they should both be treated with a universal suffrage activism.."
Ok then Why don't we look at the statistics from Rape Crisis England and Wales.
rapecrisis.org.uk/statistics.p…
Here are some other key statistics about sexual violence
Approximately 85,000 women and 12,000 men are raped in England and Wales alone every year; that's roughly 11 rapes (of adults alone) every hour.
These figures include assaults by penetration and attempts.
Nearly half a million adults are sexually assaulted in England and Wales each year
1 in 5 women aged 16 - 59 has experienced some form of sexual violence since the age of 16
Only around 15% of those who experience sexual violence choose to report to the police
Approximately 90% of those who are raped know the perpetrator prior to the offence.
And the Statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention…
In a nationally representative survey of adults:
Nearly 1 in 5 (18.3%) women and 1 in 71 men (1.4%) reported experiencing rape at some time in their lives.
Approximately 1 in 20 women and men (5.6% and 5.3%, respectively) experienced sexual violence other than rape, such as being made to penetrate someone else, sexual coercion, unwanted sexual contact, or non-contact unwanted sexual experiences, in the 12 months prior to the survey.
4.8% of men reported they were made to penetrate someone else at some time in their lives.
13% of women and 6% of men reported they experienced sexual coercion at some time in their lives.
So please tell me why these two organisations are evil lying Bolsheivk-Femnazis.
"I’m not a grammar Nazi, but when commie cunts who need to be verbally scorched with hellfire like you have such bad linguistic skill it requires rereading more than twice, you need to get educated on how to structure a sentence and learn about the REAL FUCKING WORLD KID."
The sentence was fine. I pointed out that capitalism is not a meritocracy and Trump is an example of that.
Also you don't get to tell me to "live in the real world" when you are in denial of how unequal sexual abuse is.
"You’re using one of the elite to back up your empty argument when he’s A CORPORATIST BILLIONAIRE, so he’s a fucking dope in many areas and smart in some is really all you’re proving.."
Stop using PC language about this. Trump is a capitalist.
Not sure why you have say it's not Ad Hominem to call me a commie. I'm openly a Communist, I openly call for the overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You still never debunked capitalism, you’re making useless arguments against a system that works.
also consider the 1 in 71 men is also because the public are so hsitty they hardly consider woman on man rape tp be serious..
Try again..
You only pointed out statistics to show one side of your argument, not all over the place and for both sides..
antifeminists and egalitarians have refuted this already..
universal sufferage age is the answer.
you sentence structure was not ok, the grammatical errors and needing to reread it four times was fucking garbage, you’re a typical narcissist, just like any other communism proponent, WHAT A SURPRISE, HAR HAR HAR...
Don’t reply to me again. You’re a typical commie proponent that’s out of touch with reality, have a good one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sorry but minor inconveniences and lack of motivation on their part isn't discrimination. It's lazy women bitching about shit they don't like while giving other women a bad reputation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yes , equality for women is needed in thirld world countries , but don't tell me that women are not equal to men in every western and developed country , cause that is a lie !
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
What laws discriminate against women that don't discriminate against men?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
States are still passing laws that restrict abortion rights.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Men can't opt out of fatherhood and women have far more opportunities to do that. I'm sorry, when it comes to reproductive rights, women have far more than men.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Are you seriously suggesting that basic biology is "female privilege". Women having different options on how to manage their uterus is not "female privilege" by any definition. It's a fact that men don't have uteruses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The government could make legal abortion an option, give men the right to opt out of fatherhood if someone get's pregnant. But I'm sure the feminist lobby groups would love making sure that gets no-where quickly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
There's still just as much discrimination towards men!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Not really and what sexist elements are pushed on men is largely done so by other men.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
If that's the case, then why is it being done in the first place? Why would the privileged ever disadvantage their own on an institutional scale? Furthermore, why would they discourage each other from complaining about it?
I'd love to see your mental gymnastics on this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Why would the privileged ever disadvantage their own on an institutional scale" Because who said oppression was straight forward. Remember Apartheid South Africa didn't allow blacks to serve in it armed forces while all White male South Africans were subject to conscription. Are you going to came the National Party did this because valued blacks more than whites. No of couse not.
and they would discourage each other from complaining about it because that would lead to more people trying to undermine that system.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Because who said oppression was straight forward."
It's not about being straight forward, it's about being practical. Why would oppressors ever oppress themselves? It makes no sense.
"Remember Apartheid South Africa didn't allow blacks to serve in it armed forces while all White male South Africans were subject to conscription. Are you going to came the National Party did this because valued blacks more than whites. No of couse not."
Actually, I would. Think about it: Why use your own when you can just use up some cannon fodder? Longshanks put it best: "Arrows cost money. Use up the Irish, the dead cost nothing."
"and they would discourage each other from complaining about it because that would lead to more people trying to undermine that system."
A system supposedly designed to privilege them, not screw them over.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not oppression, in their mind it's social duty of the privileged group.
"Why use your own when you can just use up some cannon fodder" Well clearly they don't Just gave you a real historical example of Apartheid South Africa where an oppressive state didn't used the oppressed as a cannon fodder.
Systems have interlocking privilege and oppression. They aren't simply or strange forward
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"It's not oppression, in their mind it's social duty of the privileged group."
Which is themselves. Do you not see the issue here?
I mean, I don't think a complete lack of reproductive rights or not being able to defend oneself against a second class citizen would ever be considered a social duty to serve oneself. It's stupid and you're stupid for arguing it.
"Systems have interlocking privilege and oppression. They aren't simply or strange forward"
This point has already been refuted, you're just repeating yourself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, Because unlike you I have taken the time to understand the context of our society.
I'll point out again, under feudalism Lords had to give military service to the Monarch while peasants didn't. Are you gotta claim the peasants had better than the lords because they didn't have same social duty.
The only one being stupid here is you arguing that some how straight, well off, white men living in the first world are some not privileged when compared to just about any other social group.
You haven't refuted, you just refused to deal with it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Thing is, Peasants were required to provide resources for the lord and work his land and were considered of less value than their lord. Now you're asking me that the men who have to provide resources for women and who are viewed as less valuable than women are the upper class in this situation.
Give me one example where the first class citizens are required to provide for and protect (to their own detriment) the needs and interests of the second class citizens.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"No, Because unlike you I have taken the time to understand the context of our society."
Clearly, you've missed some lessons.
"I'll point out again, under feudalism Lords had to give military service to the Monarch while peasants didn't. Are you gotta claim the peasants had better than the lords because they didn't have same social duty."
False equivalence. You're talking about classism, not sexism.
I'm talking about the fact that a woman can hit a man, even of higher social status than herself, and that man would be shunned were he to hit her back. Hell, even he's defending himself from a female attacker, he's often considered the violent one . I'm talking about the fact that men are supposed to devote their lives protecting and providing for their wives and children. I'm talking about the fact that a man's value is based upon if/how well he is accomplishing that. I'm talking about the fact that men have absolutely no reproductive rights, regardless of class. I'm talking about the fact that men are expendable.
None of which has anything to do with classism. While higher social status can grant men privileges that other men don't, a higher class man is less expendable than a lower class man and sometimes a lower class woman for example, that is only due to his higher social status. Take that out of the equation, and men are underprivileged to women in several ways.
"The only one being stupid here is you arguing that some how straight, well off, white men living in the first world are some not privileged when compared to just about any other social group."
Nope, only compared to white, straight, well-off women. That proves you haven't been listening to me. Tsk tsk.
"You haven't refuted"
Yes I have, and you know it.
"you just refused to deal with it."
And you're projecting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You claim I missed lesson while you clearly never went to the school for social context.
No it isn't a false equivalence. It is an example of a powerful group being given a social duty while a less powerful social group doesn't have that same duty.
Oh please, that a whole lot of shit. If a women goes after a man, most people aren't going to get mad if he pushes back. What people don't like is a strong man beating the shit out of someone far weaker and smaller than him which is what happens a lot.
"men have no reproductive rights" Buy fucking condoms, or if you so scared of having a child, don't have sex in the first place. If you wanna cry about men's reproductive rights why don't you take a second to remember that is the women who has to deal with the sickness and pains of carrying a growing person in them for 9 months and then face a very real pain and possibility of dying during or after birth. What do we have to worry about hm? Some sick on our shirts, having to get up late at night to feed the baby we helped to create and that's if you choose to stay and help raise your child, How many men refuse to pay child support or simply run away from their responsibly as a father.
Oh please tell me how white, straight, well-off women. have it so much better than us, ignoring the facts that they get paid less, have far less political and economic power than men and still have do most of the work when it comes to raising children.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"You claim I missed lesson while you clearly never went to the school for social context."
Whatever hotshot, let's see if you can walk the walk. *cracks knunckles*
"No it isn't a false equivalence. It is an example of a powerful group being given a social duty while a less powerful social group doesn't have that same duty."
So are you saying the lower class is more privileged than the higher class? Y'know what, doesn't matter.
It is a false equivalence because when you compare men and women of the same class, you still see that same discrimination being placed on them. A man is still expected to protect and provide for women, regardless of class. A man is still expected to not divulge his problems and vulnerable emotions, regardless of class. A man is still expected to sacrifice his life if need be, regardless of class.
"Oh please, that a whole lot of shit. If a women goes after a man, most people aren't going to get mad if he pushes back."
Did you even see the video? The man wasn't even being violent, yet he's seen as the aggressor.
"What people don't like is a strong man beating the shit out of someone far weaker and smaller than him which is what happens a lot."
Not as often as you'll ever admit. There's a reason men suffer more violent crime than women.
"Buy fucking condoms, or if you so scared of having a child, don't have sex in the first place."
You actually quoted this one, finally. Anyways...
Okay, if that's how it's gonna be for men, let's do the same for women: If you're scared over having a child, then buy birth control pills, or just keep your legs closed. Oh and rape? Well, you're having a child, you're having a child, suck it up.
Doesn't sound too good, does it?
"If you wanna cry about men's reproductive rights why don't you take a second to remember that is the women who has to deal with the sickness and pains of carrying a growing person in them for 9 months and then face a very real pain and possibility of dying during or after birth."
So because men don't go through pregnancy and all its complications, you're okay with a man being enslaved into fatherhood and all its complications simply because the woman decided to keep the child.
What's so wrong about being pro-choice for both sides of the equation?
"How many men refuse to pay child support or simply run away from their responsibly as a father."
When men refuse to pay child support and they've been proven to be the father, they get locked up. That, and mothers can run away from their responsibility as a mother as well, where do you think the baby-in-the-basket concept comes from? Not only that, but mothers are given much more leniency for that decision, fathers just get called deadbeat dads.
"Oh please tell me how white, straight, well-off women. have it so much better than us, ignoring the facts that they get paid less"
Yes, because businesses love to pay extra to surround themselves with cock.
"have far less political and economic power than men"
Not that simple. Oh sure, every US president was a man, but their wives lived in the White House all the same. Women can easily obtain power through manipulating powerful men, men's value is tied to how well they can provide for women after all.
"still have do most of the work when it comes to raising children."
Directly, yes, because that's the gender role that women are delegated to fill. However, on the other side of the coin, men have to work their asses off to fund their wives and children's lifestyle in order to have any sort of value in the first place. Women are already valued due to being our species reproductive limiters, which is why they're treated with greater mercy, greater sympathy, can be vulnerable without being mocked, don't have to prove their womanhood daily, and can reasonably expect to be taken care of by someone else.
Of course, women are only valued as baby factories, which comes with it's own consequences, such as not being taken as seriously, being encouraged to give up their agency for creature comforts, and being valued for their physical beauty.
It isn't a man's world, though, and that's the thing: It sucks on both ends. Women are baby factories, men are expendable tools. Both ends have their perks, but it ultimately isn't a good situation for either side. Gender roles have been used well past their due by date, so we need to get rid of the smelly boxes.
But please, continue to believe that women are so vulnerable and down-trodden that you need to rescue them. You're just playing to your gender role, and therefore part of the problem.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You what live in your little world of denial for all I care. I'm tried to trying to reason with the unreasonable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Countering your arguments is not being unreasonable, quite the opposite in fact. This suggests you can't counter the arguments I've presented, because if you could you would, yet you don't want to admit it, hence the empty accusation of me being unreasonable.
Problem is: sooner or later you're going to have to face the fact that you're wrong. And let me tell you, it's gonna be a lot easier to do it sooner rather than later.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Umm what about Hamas treating women like shit
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>