Comments: 34
GodzillaLagoon [2019-05-23 15:21:58 +0000 UTC]
Better to replace Mongolonyx with Mongolestes since Mongolonyx became extinct long before episode's setting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PCAwesomeness In reply to GodzillaLagoon [2019-05-23 17:44:09 +0000 UTC]
TBH, there are quite a few things wrong with this those drawings, and I definitely would have changed some things if I could.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chewitt99 [2018-12-03 18:14:54 +0000 UTC]
Gigantophis?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cristatu [2016-08-18 11:56:15 +0000 UTC]
Well, I apologise if I sound increasingly nitpicky and annoying, but wouldn't it have made more sense if you set it completely in Egypt, with the inland section within the Jebel Qatrani Formation, replacing Embolotherium and Mongolonyx with Arsinoitherium and Metapterodon/Akenateavus, and Puppigerus with one of the Eocene Egyptian pleurodires?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PCAwesomeness In reply to Cristatu [2016-08-18 14:10:38 +0000 UTC]
Eh, I just followed off the original episode.
However, your suggestion does make sense. I mean, Arsinoitherium is so easy to find on the Internet, with multiple (accurate) references being made. Metapterodon and Akhnatenavus, on the other hand, are so obscure that you can find no good images showing complete skeletons belonging to those two... that is, unless I should just use Hyaenodon and Hyainailouros reconstructions for them...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jdailey1991 [2016-08-06 17:25:09 +0000 UTC]
What's wrong with Apidium?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PCAwesomeness In reply to Jdailey1991 [2016-08-06 17:35:51 +0000 UTC]
I really wanted to include it, but there were two REALLY BAD PROBLEMS:
1: Many of the images of it on Google Search were untrustable WWB reconstructions
2: The only seemingly legit images of it actually depicted Aegyptopithecus
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
PCAwesomeness In reply to dinosandangrybirdfan [2018-01-13 21:41:40 +0000 UTC]
Crap, so did Aegyptopithecus.
Arguably enough, Catopithecus would've been the best bet
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dinosandangrybirdfan In reply to PCAwesomeness [2018-01-14 04:18:11 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, poor Afrovenator had that incident too.
20-40 years from now, Wuerhosaurus will turn out to be a Jurassic stegosaurid all along.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jdailey1991 In reply to PCAwesomeness [2016-08-06 17:51:04 +0000 UTC]
I'd need REAL problems, not arbitrary trivialities.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PCAwesomeness In reply to Jdailey1991 [2016-08-06 19:21:01 +0000 UTC]
Arbitrary trivialities?
Why don't you try going on Google Search and searching for any legit Apidium pictures that aren't just 60% complete skeletons, then?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tobyv23 [2016-07-30 22:31:29 +0000 UTC]
The giant shark you are referring to is Megalodon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tobyv23 In reply to PCAwesomeness [2016-07-30 23:36:01 +0000 UTC]
Can you draw a highly detailed picture of him?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wyatt-Andrews-Art [2016-07-24 17:04:42 +0000 UTC]
Walking with Beasts Ep. 2: The Limber Pool Noodle Strikes Again!
Also funny how it was such a ferocious predator yet it had such a tiny wittle face!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
acepredator In reply to Wyatt-Andrews-Art [2016-07-24 17:42:23 +0000 UTC]
Basilosaurus is so ridiculously thin that it makes the mosasaurs look torpedo-shaped in comparison...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wyatt-Andrews-Art In reply to acepredator [2016-07-26 06:37:42 +0000 UTC]
Yeah Mosasaurs when drawn correctly are kinda torpedo shaped to a degree anyway
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PCAwesomeness [2016-07-24 14:09:19 +0000 UTC]
Next episode focuses on the earthshaking giants of the Oligocene deserts...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
acepredator [2016-07-24 13:03:50 +0000 UTC]
David Peters?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PCAwesomeness In reply to acepredator [2016-07-24 13:48:22 +0000 UTC]
Yes; I didn't realize this skeletal was made by David Peters until I went on to drawing it...
www.google.com/search?q=aegypt…
By that time, I tried fixing up some of the proportions, but the time for making a different pose was too late...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Screwyoumimus [2016-07-24 10:46:08 +0000 UTC]
You messed up in "This 19 meter long basilosaurid is the 2nd largest whale to have ever existed, only beaten by the modern sperm whale." Otherwise, looking great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
PCAwesomeness In reply to Screwyoumimus [2016-07-24 14:03:26 +0000 UTC]
OK, it says that Basilosaurus cetoides was 18 meters long, and that Basilosaurus isis was slightly smaller.
What would have been B.isis' size, and what else did I mess up in that sentence?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to PCAwesomeness [2016-07-24 17:43:14 +0000 UTC]
Basilosaurus is not the second largest cetacean-not even close.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
PCAwesomeness In reply to acepredator [2016-07-24 17:45:29 +0000 UTC]
OHHHHHH
I meant toothed cetacean; I apologize.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheDerpasaur [2016-07-24 10:21:12 +0000 UTC]
Love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1