HOME | DD
poderiu β Humanitarian Mission in Libya
Published: 2011-03-13 00:42:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 1692; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 11
Redirect to original
Description
...Related content
Comments: 36
Something there is wrong. Western Reporters usually stand in front of a greenscreen.
π: 0 β©: 0
Let me know if you'd like this image/page tweeted
π: 0 β©: 1
You can use it, of course!
π: 0 β©: 0
quite ironic the contrast between what s being done to libya and syria compared to what s being done to egypt and bahrain
π: 0 β©: 0
Random American General: Hey, Obama i have an idea.
Obama: Hm?
Random American General: Y'know the civil war in Libya?
Obama: Yeah?
Random American General: Let's pretend we will send an humanitarian mission
Obama:
Random American General:AND THEN GET ALL THE OIL!111
Obama:
Meanwhile in Europe
Lol, i'm controlling the whole fuckin' world.
At least we've got the oil. That was totally worth it.
Exactly how i see the world...
π: 0 β©: 1
U.S. Military: "WE MUST SAVE ALL THE INNOCENT OIL!!!er, that is... people!"
π: 0 β©: 0
Count on the U.S to send "help" to any country in turmoil who happens to contain large reserves of good old oil. If you don't have, then your problems count for nothing, really.
π: 0 β©: 0
.. it's sad that everyone believes in the idea of western freedom and democracy
π: 0 β©: 0
.. it's sad that everyone believes in the idea of western freedom and democracy
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, I agree with you. Tell me, please: how is the relation between US and your country?
π: 0 β©: 1
Ahaha interesting question. Relations between the US and my country as a show.. sometimes they are bad, sometimes they are "good", it's just a show like it always had been. Russia and USA will never be allies, like it or not. Fortunately...or unfortunately.
π: 0 β©: 1
I thought your country had intense economic relations with the US, specifically related to oil exploitation?
π: 0 β©: 1
Not much. It is more about the more global things such as influence and of course the propaganda..
Who said Cold War is over?
π: 0 β©: 0
Kaddafi might be sometimes a bad dictator but since he became the head of Lybia, new hospitals were built, infrastructure, b4 kaddafi, only 20% of lybians had some education, now itΒ΄s 88%, average life time for women/men is higher than in many european countries. + he was a good business partner with oil and a natural blocade against immigrants from Afrika.
USA Β§ UK Β§ France donΒ΄t have the right to invade this country, since there are only 2000 rebels in 1 city. ItΒ΄s not good to read / watch / hear only USA propaganda bullshit. 2 weeks ago, when the conflict with rebels started, France wasnΒ΄t interested, then Kaddafi cut down oil for France, 2 days later France wantΒ΄s to bomb Lybia.....
π: 0 β©: 1
Yep
It's all come down to profit from now on xD
π: 0 β©: 0
Everything is about oil, the citizens are the second or third priority by those governments willing to invade countries or overthrow regimes. That's what's really sad about those events, about those governments. They only think about their own profits and see how everything work out on paper, not reality (or maybe afterwards they say "It didn't go like that in our simulation" or "That wasn't the plan").
Since the revolutions started in the Middle East many citizens died. I'm not convinced whether this revolution was actually started by the citizens or some US or European company or secret service influenced and made the citizens start it (which is evil, but a good tactic to prevent loss of their own lives). As the news brought to me mentioned the oil pipelines, that infrastructure, how Europe and the US get the supplies to their countries... things got weirder each day. And more and more I got the feeling that this was started by US or European influence. They will profit from it if the country the oil is coming from don't demand high taxes anymore and what else for transporting it... It's like they are taking over the countries... It might be weird to think like that, I don't care but that's how I think about it. This whole revolution thing looks like it will be good for the citizens (and don't get me wrong I do hope it will be better for them), but what will really happen. Almost forgot to mention that the US already has many soldiers stationed in the Middle East... Is that really for the citizens of those countries? Or is it only to protect US interests and possible for US military actions towards a country who denies access to the US or shuts down the oil transport to the US?
π: 0 β©: 1
You know, in my country, democracy was trans into "dÒn chủ" which means "People own the country". But in US cases, somehow I got the feeling that US's "democracy" it more like "dÒn là những ông chủ" a.k.a "The OWNER is the ONLY PEOPLE we know". So yeah, my thought it exactly the same with you xD
π: 0 β©: 1
Is a very good point of view.
π: 0 β©: 1
It get even better if you understand Vietnamese xD
π: 0 β©: 0
What about forming International Brigades, that way the rebels have a better chance at overthrowing gaddafi and also keeps NATO out.
π: 0 β©: 1
Rather than that, let UN do the job they're supposed to do then xD. And besides, what good could overthrow Gaddafi done to Libya then. It not like everything is solved when US hanged Saddam in Iraq, eh xD
π: 0 β©: 0
OIL INVESTMENTS IN LYBIA ONLY HAVE MACHINERY AND LABOR TO EXTRACT AT 3RD PLACE and not 1ST PLACE, IN AFRICA. Oil reserves in the US are the largest in the world, the difference between them and the Saudi ones is that the latter are being extracted.
π: 0 β©: 0
Still... something has to be done in Libya or else Gheddafi will slaughter his people like cows in a butchery
π: 0 β©: 1
It has turned to a civil war now xD, nothing can be done anymore except for the idea in the picture. It look like US has decided that their newly "protestor" isn't worth a damn anymore xD
π: 0 β©: 1
It is known that "no one does nothing for nothing". USA and EU will send soldiers ONLY in case they can gain something in exchange (oil), and not to "save the people from Gheddafi".
Anyway I'm just saying, that if they actually send some soldiers against the Gheddafi mercenaries I won't be that disappointed...
Yeah I know that they are not sending them to save people but to take the oil rigs, but at least they won't be all killed!
It's like the "lesser evil"... he's making a FUCKING holocaust! And all the rebels are being slaughtered not only by Libyan soldiers but also from mercenaries!
π: 0 β©: 1
Well about Gaddafi, for my ideas, he is a patriot. This guy wasn't running away when he can, he's didn't give a damn about the "no-fly-zone" that NATO going to implied. And besides, take a look at Bahrain, they're also using tanks and troops against the protestor, but where is CNN? Oh I forgot, Bahrain is spent 1/5 of it's ground for US airbases
You know, the thing happened in Libya kinda remind me about the movie Black Hawk Down, where they're said "In Somali, killing it negotiating". Now look at Libya: It was originally formed by forcing tribes to work together, and between tribes there's always conflic. Gaddafi managed to delayed it only by not giving away it fuel to some foreign companies but to spend it on the country. And for God's sakes, that man's living on a TENT.
And another thing, who's entirely sure that if Gaddafi was defeated from the beginning, will the "rebels" stop making a holocaust out of Libya, and will UN do anything about it
History already has an expample:
[link]
[link]
Kinda funny, doesn't it. When there's civil war going on in a country then people screaming that it was a "crime against mankind", but when one of their "allies of freedom" having a same thing when there's DOESN'T EVEN WAR YET then it become their "internal matter". People called it "double standard", but personally for me, it was HIPOCRITE.
π: 0 β©: 0
tsc.tsc.tsc. the history sadly repites itselft. again and again.
nice one.
shared on facebook.
π: 0 β©: 1
A dejΓ‘ vu... most recent, from Iraq.
π: 0 β©: 1