HOME | DD

PrehistoryByLiam — Microraptor by-nc-nd

#bird #black #cretaceous #cryptovolans #dino #dinosaur #dromaeosaurid #feathers #formation #gui #iridescence #iridescent #liam #mesozoic #micro #microraptor #paleoart #paleontology #raptor #sinornithosaurus #theropod #wing #elward #feathereddinosaur #zhaoianus #hesperonychus #tianyuraptor #graciliraptor #jiufotang #microraptorine #microraptoria #changyuraptor #jeholbiota #prehistorybyliam
Published: 2020-05-13 12:53:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 15354; Favourites: 561; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Reconstruction of the iconic four-winged dromaeosaurid Microraptor zhaoianus. I sort of forget how amazing this animal is, and how mind-blowing of a discovery it is. For those who don't know, Microraptor was a fairly small (crow-sized) dromaeosaurid dinosaur, distantly related to Velociraptor. It lived in what is now Liaoning, northeastern China, during the Early Cretaceous period 120 million years ago. The environment was fairly chilly by Cretaceous standards, and Microraptor was relatively common in the subtropical/temperate forests of conifer and ginkgo trees, where it would have fed on anything it could catch. There is some disagreement over Microraptor's flying ability, with opinions ranging from it being a parachuting-glider to being fully capable of powered, flapping flight. Regardless, it would not have been nearly as at home in the air as modern birds. Microraptor is also a member of that ever-growing club of extinct animals for which we know something about their coloration. It was, according to the latest research, covered in a coat of feathers that were glossy black, iridescent like modern crows and ravens. 
    Microraptor is such a cool species, and I felt it would be a good way to channel my efforts into effectively rendering iridescence. I felt I had to sacrifice a lot of detail to get the color I wanted in my reconstruction of Caihong , so the goal for this piece was to keep it both convincingly iridescent and detailed. I don't think it's perfect, and I still have a ways to go, but I'm very happy with how this turned out overall. I mainly referenced living corvids like crows and ravens, as they're the most common birds with this color scheme. However, as I've learned there are so many different variations on "black" that no one way is right or wrong. 
References:
science.sciencemag.org/content…
www.deviantart.com/dinomaniac/…
www.deviantart.com/qilong/art/…
www.deviantart.com/scotthartma…
archosaurmusings.wordpress.com…
monikazagrobelna.com/2019/08/2…
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFCgwg…
Related content
Comments: 33

MightyTalos [2023-11-02 09:46:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Yurithebotfly [2021-08-31 14:27:27 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MantaFlo [2020-11-05 18:20:23 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

grisador [2020-05-18 09:48:06 +0000 UTC]

Magnificent! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheDinoDrawer66 [2020-05-15 04:57:53 +0000 UTC]

Splendid work. You replicated the iridescence very well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to TheDinoDrawer66 [2020-05-15 11:08:54 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheDinoDrawer66 In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2020-05-15 12:40:23 +0000 UTC]

No problems!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tigon1Monster [2020-05-13 17:10:19 +0000 UTC]

Don't forget that it's nocturnal.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to Tigon1Monster [2020-05-15 11:09:32 +0000 UTC]

That's one idea, I'm not 100% sold either way though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tigon1Monster In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2020-05-15 14:42:37 +0000 UTC]

Even the based on the size of the Sclerotic ring?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to Tigon1Monster [2020-05-18 12:20:21 +0000 UTC]

I think the iridescence could very well contradict that. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

acepredator In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2020-06-10 02:14:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tigon1Monster In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2020-05-18 15:59:58 +0000 UTC]

I was just thinking when the moon is out, that iridescence might somehow hide it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to Tigon1Monster [2020-05-20 13:40:35 +0000 UTC]

If the moon was out, the iridescent feathers would reflect that light since they're so glossy/shiny. So it'd be like putting a spotlight on it in a way

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

acepredator In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2020-06-10 02:14:58 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tigon1Monster In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2020-05-20 16:52:06 +0000 UTC]

But it could use that shine to blind it's prey.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

E-Smaniotto [2020-05-13 17:06:55 +0000 UTC]

Is this your best work? I don't know but I'm sure about one thing: it is AMAZING.
Wonderful illustration Liam, keep up the good work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to E-Smaniotto [2020-05-15 11:09:52 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much!!! You too

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShinRedDear [2020-05-13 15:00:34 +0000 UTC]

I think you succeeded in conveying a realistinc iridescence, even if the exact shade of Microraptor is unknown (could be way more blueish for all we know). What I'm surprised of is why you had the tail cut off from the picture. DA had framing issues?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to ShinRedDear [2020-05-15 11:10:57 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much! You're right, it could have been more blueish or even more grey/blackish. And the tail going off the page was more a personal/artistic choice than a technical error

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShinRedDear In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2020-05-15 15:14:02 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for your reply! These are good reasons. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

acepredator [2020-05-13 14:35:17 +0000 UTC]

The coloration of Microraptor has led to the misconception (perpetuates by the authors of the paper that detailed its colours) that it couldn’t have been nocturnal as supposedly no iridescent birds today are nocturnal, and as this coloration was supposedly there for the same reason as corvids and grackles (display).

Which makes no sense given that a) there ARE some nocturnal birds with iridescent plumage (some waterfowl), and b) Microraptor is ecologically so incompatible with corvids or grackles that it’s actually unlikely it was iridescent black for the same reason as them. The best hypothesis (albeit a non-professional one) is that the iridescent black plumes were actually a nocturnal adaptation, acting as a sort of active camouflage.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TinkerTanker44432 [2020-05-13 13:55:14 +0000 UTC]

Why can't birds look like that today

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaprosuchusDragon In reply to TinkerTanker44432 [2020-05-13 14:14:06 +0000 UTC]

ever seen a raven my guy

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

TinkerTanker44432 In reply to KaprosuchusDragon [2020-05-13 14:28:42 +0000 UTC]

Since when do Ravens have raptor claws on their feet?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaprosuchusDragon In reply to TinkerTanker44432 [2020-05-13 19:41:44 +0000 UTC]

ohh ok i get it thought you meant more general coloration and plumage

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TinkerTanker44432 In reply to KaprosuchusDragon [2020-05-14 02:01:26 +0000 UTC]

It's ok!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaprosuchusDragon In reply to TinkerTanker44432 [2020-05-14 07:24:23 +0000 UTC]

ok

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Libra1010 [2020-05-13 13:49:29 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to Libra1010 [2020-05-15 11:13:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! Although I'm not sure about your logic there. Birds are dinosaurs precisely because they're extremely derived descendants of one very specific lineage. Humans are primates for the exact same reason.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Libra1010 In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2020-05-19 17:48:28 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PrehistoryByLiam In reply to Libra1010 [2020-05-20 13:39:41 +0000 UTC]

That's not an apt comparison. We all descend from "fishy" beings, aka stem-tetrapods & the first tetrapods. What unites every tetrapod is not their "fishy-ness", but that they share the same skeletal characteristics, inherited from the same common ancestor. So we're not all fishy beings, but we are all tetrapods. That's also a vastly different evolutionary span to birds/dinosaurs. A better one might be; birds are to dinosaurs as humans are to primates. We descended from a small, arboreal mammal covered in fur, but we're not tiny furry tree-dwellers. And yet, we are still primates. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ropen7789 [2020-05-13 13:00:37 +0000 UTC]

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0