Comments: 33
MantaFlo [2020-11-05 18:20:23 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
grisador [2020-05-18 09:48:06 +0000 UTC]
Magnificent!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheDinoDrawer66 [2020-05-15 04:57:53 +0000 UTC]
Splendid work. You replicated the iridescence very well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tigon1Monster [2020-05-13 17:10:19 +0000 UTC]
Don't forget that it's nocturnal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tigon1Monster In reply to PrehistoryByLiam [2020-05-18 15:59:58 +0000 UTC]
I was just thinking when the moon is out, that iridescence might somehow hide it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PrehistoryByLiam In reply to Tigon1Monster [2020-05-20 13:40:35 +0000 UTC]
If the moon was out, the iridescent feathers would reflect that light since they're so glossy/shiny. So it'd be like putting a spotlight on it in a way
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
E-Smaniotto [2020-05-13 17:06:55 +0000 UTC]
Is this your best work? I don't know but I'm sure about one thing: it is AMAZING.
Wonderful illustration Liam, keep up the good work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ShinRedDear [2020-05-13 15:00:34 +0000 UTC]
I think you succeeded in conveying a realistinc iridescence, even if the exact shade of Microraptor is unknown (could be way more blueish for all we know). What I'm surprised of is why you had the tail cut off from the picture. DA had framing issues?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PrehistoryByLiam In reply to ShinRedDear [2020-05-15 11:10:57 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much! You're right, it could have been more blueish or even more grey/blackish. And the tail going off the page was more a personal/artistic choice than a technical error
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator [2020-05-13 14:35:17 +0000 UTC]
The coloration of Microraptor has led to the misconception (perpetuates by the authors of the paper that detailed its colours) that it couldn’t have been nocturnal as supposedly no iridescent birds today are nocturnal, and as this coloration was supposedly there for the same reason as corvids and grackles (display).
Which makes no sense given that a) there ARE some nocturnal birds with iridescent plumage (some waterfowl), and b) Microraptor is ecologically so incompatible with corvids or grackles that it’s actually unlikely it was iridescent black for the same reason as them. The best hypothesis (albeit a non-professional one) is that the iridescent black plumes were actually a nocturnal adaptation, acting as a sort of active camouflage.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Libra1010 [2020-05-13 13:49:29 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PrehistoryByLiam In reply to Libra1010 [2020-05-15 11:13:12 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! Although I'm not sure about your logic there. Birds are dinosaurs precisely because they're extremely derived descendants of one very specific lineage. Humans are primates for the exact same reason.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PrehistoryByLiam In reply to Libra1010 [2020-05-20 13:39:41 +0000 UTC]
That's not an apt comparison. We all descend from "fishy" beings, aka stem-tetrapods & the first tetrapods. What unites every tetrapod is not their "fishy-ness", but that they share the same skeletal characteristics, inherited from the same common ancestor. So we're not all fishy beings, but we are all tetrapods. That's also a vastly different evolutionary span to birds/dinosaurs. A better one might be; birds are to dinosaurs as humans are to primates. We descended from a small, arboreal mammal covered in fur, but we're not tiny furry tree-dwellers. And yet, we are still primates.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ropen7789 [2020-05-13 13:00:37 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0