HOME | DD
Ramen27 β And full of bullshit
[NSFW]
Published: 2011-07-12 00:04:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 25793; Favourites: 654; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Counter-stamp to shit like this: [link]Let's look at the facts, shall we?
Pedophilia:
A psychiatric disorder in adults or late adolescents, characterized by a sexual interest in prepubescent children.
Shotacon/lolicon:
A genre of manga and anime wherein pre-pubescent or pubescent characters are depicted in a suggestive or erotic manner.
To simplify, shota and loli depicts children in a sexual context. Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to children. Shota/loli is for pedophiles. By supporting shota/loli, you ARE supporting pedophilia. Everyone got that?
Related content
Comments: 1937
π: 2 β©: 0
π: 3 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 4 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 2
π: 2 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 1
π: 2 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 2 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 3 β©: 0
Go ΟΟ ck and yourself if you support child sex
π: 2 β©: 1
Typo: there should not be an 'and'
π: 0 β©: 0
I like cute things. (Moe) But not sexually...... I hate pedophillia but I like every cute drawings ;3
π: 4 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
if you like cute young children but nonsexually, moe is a much better alternative,Β
π: 3 β©: 2
π: 0 β©: 0
Correct, you're not supporting pedophilia if you support (wont say like because that's weird in this sentence) children. Because Shota means 'boy', and loli means 'girl'.
Β
HOWEVER, you PROBABLY would still support shotacon and lolicon (pedophilia)(which both means 'to have a (sexual) attraction to boys/girls). It doesn't matter if it's fiction or not, the problem is that in both situations, it's a CHILD. Fiction or not, it's still disgusting.
So basically, an example. Watch child pornography (real) = disgusting. Watch child pornography (fiction) = equally disgusting.
There is no difference, besides one being drawn, and one being realistic. As long as there's a child involved, everyone has the right to tell you it's disgusting, and you should change something if you like shotacon/lolicon.
π: 2 β©: 4
π: 1 β©: 0
I HATE CHILD PORN. THEY ARE NOT EVEN MATURE ENOUGH. THEY DO NOT DESERVE DIRTY MIDS
π: 0 β©: 0
I DO NOT support shota con
π: 0 β©: 0
So what you're saying is that since it's not real, it's 100% okay to see sexualized children? You don't have to act upon it to know how disgusting it is. I understand that this situation happening in real life is worse, but that does not make it okay in fiction.
They are the same since a child is involved, but one is obviously considered worse.
It doesn't matter if it's fiction. If you want to see a child being sexually abused (regardless of if it's real or fiction), you either deserve death, or a permanent time in jail.
That's definitely not like being stabbed in real life. Being stabbed is not as bad as pedophilia, and you especially wouldn't be considered a killer by looking at it, unless you're some sicko. It's more likely in loli/shotacon, because what fucking normal person would look at that type of stuff?
Fiction isn't real, but that does not make it okay. It's disgusting and heartbreaking. It's bad because you could say it takes inspiration from REAL victims, or fantasies children being abused.
Reality is real, but that also doesn't mean it's okay. It's worse because it actually happens.
Now here's something that you need to think about, because your post at all didn't get it.
Notice how the consent of Japan (where you should know where loli/shotacon came from) is 13. Pedophilia is somewhat okay there, and apparently from my research, is common. This makes sense on why it's so common in Japan's fiction.
π: 1 β©: 3
You keep using distortion... I did not say that it is okay...
π: 0 β©: 0
No kids can be involved in porns!
π: 0 β©: 0
Honey, you're old enough to know that wikipedia isn't a reliable source. Use a different source next time.
However, I will actually excuse it because I saw this in my research from a different site.
You never answered my questions.
Here, do you know what porn is? Do you know what it's widely watched for? To get off at whatever they're watching.
This is is child porn, regardless of what you think.
It is illegal.
Not only in the US, but also in many other countries. There have also been arrests Β for them, because they obviously possessed child pornography. .
Again, OBVIOUSLY real child rape is worse, and should be erased. But that doesn't make fictional child rape okay, it can encourage it.
π: 1 β©: 3
Go search straw man fallacy, you are keep committing it
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh god... When did I say I support rapes of kids...
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't support child rape!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
EXACTLY. Yet another reason why anime and its ridiculous rabid fanatics are CANCER...
π: 1 β©: 0
well then i am a proud supporter of pedophilia.
there's nothing wrong here guys whats wrong with lolicon
π: 3 β©: 1
π: 2 β©: 0
young children depicted nonsexually but in a cute way, that's called moe, and it's really cute, it's basically nonsexual lolis
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah I like moe itβs so cute~
(guys play moemon owo)
π: 0 β©: 0
Shut up I can find prepubescent simon the digger sexy
π: 1 β©: 0
All in all, pedophils are... I canβt find the right word for it. Not even calling them scum is good enough.
π: 0 β©: 1
Look through the Urban Dictionary, perhaps? Youβll find a good term for those dumpster fires...>:3
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>