HOME | DD

rawimage β€” High Tide

Published: 2008-01-10 21:52:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 5085; Favourites: 67; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Yet again my beloved cement plant in Mainz, Germany

Related works: [link] [link]

Should I put into Manip or is it still Photography since the manip is not that obvious? I always forget about that.
Related content
Comments: 23

Jez92 [2009-03-12 16:14:36 +0000 UTC]

Great

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

shepa [2008-01-21 14:40:17 +0000 UTC]

sick foto ! i like that dark..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rawimage In reply to shepa [2008-01-21 15:28:04 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

proverbialcheese [2008-01-13 05:00:09 +0000 UTC]

Nicely done.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jaroto [2008-01-12 04:37:27 +0000 UTC]

yes man, art is about freedom, the technic that u use helps you to put out the beauty that you have inside

nice colors and contrast

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rawimage In reply to Jaroto [2008-01-12 13:09:15 +0000 UTC]

very nice. thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Bobsmade [2008-01-12 00:04:45 +0000 UTC]

sehr schΓΆn, verlassene Industrie wie sie mag.
Das unbearbeitete is mein Favorit aus der reihe.
mir gefΓ€llt diese leicht verwellte Spiegelung.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

rawimage In reply to Bobsmade [2008-01-12 13:07:18 +0000 UTC]

tja, industrie kann auch schon sein. leider ist die fabrik alles andere als verlassen, es brennt doch sogar noch licht aber stimmt schon, so wie die anlage da im zwielicht steht, wirkt sie ruhig und verlassen.
vielen dank auch fΓΌr deinen fav; die sind spΓ€rlich gesΓ€t

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Bobsmade In reply to Bobsmade [2008-01-12 00:05:42 +0000 UTC]

wie ich sie mag, sorry

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

eisenkalk [2008-01-11 21:06:04 +0000 UTC]

very cool. just a bit eingeengt. did you change the sky?
cool depth!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rawimage In reply to eisenkalk [2008-01-11 22:57:47 +0000 UTC]

addicted to the square
no I didn't touch the sky .. just a bit of vignetting

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FiLH [2008-01-11 18:23:25 +0000 UTC]

Soft

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Razumichin [2008-01-11 13:29:23 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic photo!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rawimage In reply to Razumichin [2008-01-11 13:49:15 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mrh [2008-01-11 02:48:54 +0000 UTC]

Nice shot!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

conatgion [2008-01-10 22:05:53 +0000 UTC]

i think it's not about how obvious it is
it's about how serious it is

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rawimage In reply to conatgion [2008-01-11 09:22:29 +0000 UTC]

yeah, I meant serious with obvious.
Do you think it's serious engough?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

conatgion In reply to rawimage [2008-01-11 15:51:20 +0000 UTC]

as i see it's only colors, contrast and cropping so it's photography or maybe (digital) darkroom

i was messed up with these categories but read the gallery infos carefully and now i don't care much about it anymore
there are no exact borders in art

but this picture seems to fit it's category to me and i think you shouldn't worry at all about it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

meemo [2008-01-10 21:59:22 +0000 UTC]

looks cool mate.
i think if you cant see it has been manipulated it should be in the photography section still.

my 2 cents

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rawimage In reply to meemo [2008-01-11 09:25:11 +0000 UTC]

thanks jannis! I guess this manip discussion will never end. at least for me the guide lines don't make any sense at all.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

meemo In reply to rawimage [2008-01-11 20:28:03 +0000 UTC]

yea those guidelines are very non-descript for some categories

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Daywish [2008-01-10 21:54:35 +0000 UTC]

Concrete romantic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rawimage In reply to Daywish [2008-01-10 22:04:15 +0000 UTC]

just you and me in a rowboat

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0