Comments: 44
FiLH [2007-06-30 14:50:42 +0000 UTC]
My industrial life
π: 0 β©: 0
alltheantics [2006-12-21 03:32:13 +0000 UTC]
The black is so inky. Love it!
π: 0 β©: 1
Chloa [2006-12-12 22:12:46 +0000 UTC]
strange.
and i like it this way.
π: 0 β©: 1
myrnajacobs [2006-12-12 10:59:33 +0000 UTC]
dragging something from the archives can be so good. I like this. Now get busy, you lazy bugger..
π: 0 β©: 1
sputnikpixel [2006-12-10 19:26:55 +0000 UTC]
Cool cool, schΓΆne Texturen... wirkt irgendwie sehr dΓΌster, fast bedrohlich.
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to sputnikpixel [2006-12-11 09:19:16 +0000 UTC]
DankeschΓΆn. Alles Handarbeit.
π: 0 β©: 0
BitterGrapes [2006-12-10 00:43:48 +0000 UTC]
Hot! I love the treatment you gave it.
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to BitterGrapes [2006-12-10 17:31:28 +0000 UTC]
hehe thanks. I treated it real bad
π: 0 β©: 1
genom4 [2006-12-09 14:38:31 +0000 UTC]
great work!
π: 0 β©: 1
Locopunkster [2006-12-07 00:39:55 +0000 UTC]
WOW! Awesome print! The Ilford film you use is color?
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to Locopunkster [2006-12-07 08:23:00 +0000 UTC]
no, no, it's bw. The color comes from the paper. it's old cream colored paper. Of course the saturation is pushed in PS
π: 0 β©: 1
Locopunkster In reply to rawimage [2006-12-08 03:03:27 +0000 UTC]
Ahhh... So wait, let me get this straight. I can get a paper that when I print my B&W negatives onto it it'll look a cream color?
π: 0 β©: 1
Locopunkster In reply to rawimage [2006-12-09 05:00:03 +0000 UTC]
Awww, damn! T_T Is it still the same printing process as normal RC paper?
π: 0 β©: 1
LAPoor [2006-12-06 21:19:10 +0000 UTC]
I love it. I looks sort of like it's bleeding into the air between the bars... cool chp-ish thing too. XD
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to LAPoor [2006-12-08 12:31:41 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot!
chp-ish?
π: 0 β©: 0
Archlungs [2006-12-06 19:38:24 +0000 UTC]
This is really cool. Black lines through black lines. The sky is in a whole different world altogether. It's proof of the times. Looks great! Well done.
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to Archlungs [2006-12-06 21:15:05 +0000 UTC]
Thanks mate. I wish it would have turned a little brighter in the shadows and not that askew though.
π: 0 β©: 1
Archlungs In reply to rawimage [2006-12-06 21:28:03 +0000 UTC]
Reckon it's fine the way it is, man. With the shadows as dark as they are the structure looks in between two dimensions; the corporeal and the intangible. An imposing darkness. Half the reason why it's good as it is! The other half being technical skill, haha, you're very talented.
π: 0 β©: 1
eisenkalk [2006-12-06 14:17:44 +0000 UTC]
interesting.
like the new stamp!
why do real scratches always look so less real than fake ones?
have to say i don't like the mixture of the big black space and the lines. either one combined with the sky would be a better pic imo, if you know what i mean... (theoretical, not that i would cut this photo in half or so...)
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to eisenkalk [2006-12-07 10:00:14 +0000 UTC]
abgemacht
π: 0 β©: 0
p-h-o-e-n-y-x [2006-12-06 13:51:19 +0000 UTC]
boah find ich klasse
π: 0 β©: 1
Jean-R In reply to rawimage [2006-12-07 07:41:17 +0000 UTC]
'cause of architectural-straight lines & fun stamp.
see ya.
π: 0 β©: 0
rawimage In reply to kyrczman [2006-12-06 12:56:28 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! The scratches are real this time..
π: 0 β©: 1