HOME | DD

RobCaswell In reply to ??? [2011-03-20 18:40:40 +0000 UTC]

Aye...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

we-r-nomad In reply to ??? [2011-02-15 01:43:26 +0000 UTC]

Are we talking about the same show? Show me a woman in TOS who wasn't a crucial babe. (An don't go saying the Talosians. They were all played by women, but they were supposed to be gender nuetral!)

This is a nice render, but this babe would be standard issue on the Enterprise.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to we-r-nomad [2011-02-15 18:47:06 +0000 UTC]

There were a few TOS non-hotties.
But only a few
It was a time when hotties ruled the day!!!
Your Trek DiD stuff is a lot of fun, BTW

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

yankee30 In reply to ??? [2010-11-26 21:24:53 +0000 UTC]

Since TOS women were curvatious and half naked
even Star Fleet Officers....

This fits right in

But didn't the female uni's show little more chest ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to yankee30 [2010-11-26 21:28:09 +0000 UTC]

Naw. One had to use their imagination

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dinobatfan In reply to ??? [2010-10-27 00:10:18 +0000 UTC]

Oh wow! Smokin' indeed!!! Yep, question answered! You really do create some outstanding art!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to dinobatfan [2010-10-27 14:30:39 +0000 UTC]

Well THANK YOU! I'm glad you concur with my Question's Answer

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dinobatfan In reply to RobCaswell [2010-10-28 00:54:30 +0000 UTC]

I think it would be just about impossible not to.

If you want to be evil and probably wipe out just about every one of us Star Trek or sci fi fanboys, or just have some fun...imagine her in a Mirror universe Starfleet Uniform.

The lust lock and overload would probably be amazing don't you think?

What do you think? Evil but fun possibility?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to dinobatfan [2010-10-28 05:00:36 +0000 UTC]

Heh - I'll keep that one in mind.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dinobatfan In reply to RobCaswell [2010-10-28 19:05:12 +0000 UTC]

Good stuff!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Blades-123 In reply to ??? [2010-10-25 14:19:06 +0000 UTC]

Hell yeah! Can't have too many sexy yeomen!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Blades-123 [2010-10-25 14:22:39 +0000 UTC]

Maybe not.... but it'd be fun to try! Maybe we can get a research grant!??!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mylochka In reply to ??? [2010-10-25 01:03:47 +0000 UTC]

Nope. Gene Roddenberry would hire her on the spot -- Meet Lt Allura and her ample... qualifications. What a cutie!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to mylochka [2010-10-25 03:24:37 +0000 UTC]

Ah, the perks of being The Producer

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RobCaswell In reply to RexAngelorum [2010-10-24 15:01:10 +0000 UTC]

Aye. Skirts have just gotten longer since....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RobCaswell In reply to roylapost [2010-10-24 15:01:28 +0000 UTC]

LOL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

celticarchie In reply to ??? [2010-10-22 11:02:54 +0000 UTC]

"Too sexy to be a Star Trek character"... Ach, laddie that's just not possible. More like, "This character is so sexy she MUST be a Star Trek character!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to celticarchie [2010-10-22 12:49:13 +0000 UTC]

OK. She can stay.
If you insist.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

celticarchie In reply to RobCaswell [2010-10-22 13:22:51 +0000 UTC]

But the Ferengi in the gorilla suit really has to go...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

RobCaswell In reply to celticarchie [2010-10-22 13:30:38 +0000 UTC]

Does that mean we can keep the one in the cute gnome outfit?
Huh-huh??!?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

celticarchie In reply to RobCaswell [2010-10-23 22:44:09 +0000 UTC]

Mental image overload...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

celticarchie In reply to celticarchie [2010-10-22 13:24:04 +0000 UTC]

Actually, she looks similar to a woman I work with.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to celticarchie [2010-10-23 22:47:51 +0000 UTC]

Um...are you hiring?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

celticarchie In reply to RobCaswell [2010-10-24 20:40:38 +0000 UTC]

I don't even employ.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to celticarchie [2010-10-24 21:14:48 +0000 UTC]

Can I have your job then???

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

celticarchie In reply to RobCaswell [2010-10-25 13:54:13 +0000 UTC]

Urm...I kinda need it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to celticarchie [2010-10-25 14:07:43 +0000 UTC]

Wanna share???

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

celticarchie In reply to RobCaswell [2010-10-26 01:10:03 +0000 UTC]

We can't live on half a baked bean a month mate...it just ain't gonna work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to celticarchie [2010-10-26 01:24:18 +0000 UTC]

You mean you eat a WHOLE bean every month!??!
You lucky dog!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

celticarchie In reply to RobCaswell [2010-10-26 23:47:06 +0000 UTC]

More like a sixteenth after my credit card takes it's bite! (

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dawnie2008 In reply to ??? [2010-10-22 10:25:42 +0000 UTC]

yes

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Dawnie2008 [2010-10-22 12:45:50 +0000 UTC]

I'll drink to that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

manosb In reply to ??? [2010-10-22 08:52:06 +0000 UTC]

Why yes it is. I call this "success"! Great lady Arcas and love the striking red.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to manosb [2010-10-22 12:45:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. Too bad the color gets such a bad Star Trek rap

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

manosb In reply to RobCaswell [2010-10-22 13:26:19 +0000 UTC]

Hah!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RobCaswell In reply to Dimsdale00 [2010-10-22 12:44:50 +0000 UTC]

Ah, we came to the same answer!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ptrope In reply to ??? [2010-10-22 07:14:50 +0000 UTC]

sigh ...

I like the way you used the chevron.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Ptrope [2010-10-22 12:44:29 +0000 UTC]

Ya liked the chevron...?

The chevron??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ptrope In reply to RobCaswell [2010-10-22 21:24:52 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, but the sigh was for her!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RobCaswell In reply to LmAnt [2010-10-22 12:41:59 +0000 UTC]

AND she has more hair!

(where it matters)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ChidoWear In reply to ??? [2010-10-22 05:45:46 +0000 UTC]

Amazing work, brother! Yes, she is the answer to your question indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to ChidoWear [2010-10-22 12:41:26 +0000 UTC]

LOL!
But why did I have to ask it? *sob*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0