HOME | DD

Ry-Spirit — #184 Egglyn - #185 Gosalyn - #186 Quiverlyn by-nc-nd

#bird #birdie #dangerous #dark #darkwing #darkwingduck #disney #duck #ducktales #evolution #evolutions #gosalyn #quack #shadow #quiverwing #ryspirit #disneyevolutions #birdiemcdonalds #disneyevo
Published: 2020-04-10 11:07:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 55934; Favourites: 1248; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Here is the Disney Evolution of Gosalyn, Darkwing's daughter. And yes Im aware Quiverlyn looks like Birdie from Mcdonalds.

           

[Buy T-Shirt] [Facebook] [Tumblr] [Youtube] [Twitter] [Instagram]
Related content
Comments: 68

alp12121 [2023-07-19 10:25:36 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alp12121 In reply to alp12121 [2023-07-19 13:08:12 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

monstermaster13 [2023-03-22 05:15:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

angelicartist101 [2023-01-31 08:38:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Dinzydragon [2022-08-11 11:06:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

allythegreat1 [2022-07-29 20:39:21 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

greatwhiteshark1993 [2021-10-11 05:58:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

alp12121 In reply to greatwhiteshark1993 [2023-09-02 18:00:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

greatwhiteshark1993 In reply to alp12121 [2023-09-02 18:00:51 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

scorpicat [2021-09-26 15:03:14 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KaraKitten14 [2021-06-05 21:23:29 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Os-a-lot In reply to KaraKitten14 [2022-11-06 23:42:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

BstTeddy [2021-03-13 15:28:29 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

LadySionis [2021-02-02 06:27:46 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Austin7613 [2020-08-12 19:20:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Touch-Not-This-Cat [2020-07-12 01:44:55 +0000 UTC]

“Her Father”?
Her ACTUAL father was a brilliant inventor, although his masterpiece probably was meant primarily for international peacekeeping, given the parties involved that were after it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qiralyn-Cassette In reply to Touch-Not-This-Cat [2021-03-27 06:15:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Touch-Not-This-Cat In reply to Qiralyn-Cassette [2021-03-28 00:15:45 +0000 UTC]

What, Drake just happened to have a fling with the daughter of that inventor?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qiralyn-Cassette In reply to Touch-Not-This-Cat [2021-03-28 06:44:28 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Touch-Not-This-Cat In reply to Qiralyn-Cassette [2021-03-28 07:42:17 +0000 UTC]

🤦🏽
DUH!
Thank you Captain Obvious for sailing us in a circle so perfect, you could measure it’s Pi radius down to its ten millionth digit!
For your next AMAZING feat, your will calculate the exact number of time Launchpad has safely landed with no crashing whatsoever!🙄

Good grief, I was RAISED on Darkwing, I remember his first Episode was premiered on “The Mickey Mouse Club” during the Disney Channel’s transition from an Pay-extra Package channel to a General-Package cable channel, done primarily to compete better with the then brand new Cartoon Network, which had been kicking their Butt all of 1991, although I only figured all that out later.
It was HUGE, and like “Bonkers” was riding high on the grand success of “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”
A few years earlier.
So, don’t tell me about him being her “Real Dad”, or not, because I GET what you mean, I got it when I was 9 years old! I’m just old fashioned in my definitions of things. The way I classify what you mean to be in the spiritual and legalistic dimensions, for example. She’s “The Daughter of his Heart”, as well as his legal daughter. Where we’re getting hung up is on “actual”. I’m particularly old fashioned in how I use that word. “I don’t think it means what you think it means”, as a certain Spaniard might say.
It’s a very absolutist term, and when not modified, say, with something like “Darkwing’s Actual Adopted Daughter”, “actual” has to default to its most basic grammatical and definitional use, which in the classical context, would imply her BIOLOGICAL father. That’s what I was correcting. I loathe letting meanings change when we already had words for the “new” meaning popular laziness cannot be bothered to learn, apparently.
“She Really is his daughter in the show” would have been much better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qiralyn-Cassette In reply to Touch-Not-This-Cat [2021-03-28 18:01:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Touch-Not-This-Cat In reply to Qiralyn-Cassette [2021-03-28 19:57:14 +0000 UTC]

Well, I’m sorry this silly hodgepodge language is degenerating so much to cause that confusion.
If anyone feels hurt, that is only because they’re using “actual” wrong. Within the proper usage, it doesn’t denigrate that bond at all, it has nothing to do with it. The concept of “actuality”, by itself, is a very generally deterministic and empiricist one, but in the context of familial relationships, it comes across, again, in that PROPER context, as BIOLOGICALLY Deterministic.
That’s how I have always used “actual” since completing my education. I’ve been aware of the general drift of misuse of the word, as all such muddling Word Crimes get on my nerves, but you are the first to take such serious offense at my proper usage.
I was half jokingly inviting a correction in the original comment anyway, as I had not intended to take this TOO seriously. This is just a silly cartoon, after all, one I loved as a child but I’m an adult now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qiralyn-Cassette In reply to Touch-Not-This-Cat [2021-03-28 20:33:48 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Touch-Not-This-Cat In reply to Qiralyn-Cassette [2021-03-29 01:03:41 +0000 UTC]

😨”....!”

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qiralyn-Cassette In reply to Touch-Not-This-Cat [2021-03-29 05:55:46 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

Venicequeen1011 In reply to Qiralyn-Cassette [2022-03-22 07:31:23 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qiralyn-Cassette In reply to Venicequeen1011 [2022-03-22 19:18:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Venicequeen1011 In reply to Qiralyn-Cassette [2022-03-23 03:48:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Touch-Not-This-Cat In reply to Qiralyn-Cassette [2021-03-29 05:59:21 +0000 UTC]

I ASSURE you, proper grammar has been my only interest in this whole conversation .
I think we can leave it at that.



....eww 🤢....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gachatuber00067 [2020-06-28 03:38:35 +0000 UTC]

An amazing evolution of Gosalyn

👍: 3 ⏩: 0

AshleyWolf259 [2020-05-22 04:33:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

Ravenclaw105 [2020-05-19 06:50:10 +0000 UTC]

How about some Pokémon versions of some famous gaming characters such as Mario, Link, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro the Dragon, Kirby etc.
Would love to see that
Amazing work as Always.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

MrNintMan [2020-05-17 12:52:12 +0000 UTC]

AMAZING^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheRealCodeBlack [2020-04-24 18:31:45 +0000 UTC]

This is officially my favorite Quiverwing Quack design. The medieval stylings rock. I think I like it even more than the Darkwing! Quiverwing design from the comics.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mistressphanto [2020-04-22 00:41:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

katwatkins [2020-04-20 15:26:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MartinTyne [2020-04-20 02:58:57 +0000 UTC]

Will any Marvel Heroes be done in this style?
That would be so cool to see the first form for Spider Man or Venom

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ry-Spirit In reply to MartinTyne [2020-04-20 03:09:36 +0000 UTC]

Mayb just groot and rocket racoon. I tend to avoid human looking characters. They feel more like trainers to me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

con1011 In reply to Ry-Spirit [2020-04-23 02:05:04 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Environmentalist1 [2020-04-18 23:57:12 +0000 UTC]

Could Muppets get evolutions too since they’re owned by Disney?
Also Hades from Hercules (he’s a god and not human)? And Chernabog from Fantasia? And Mushu from Mulan?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EvilMariobot [2020-04-17 13:31:15 +0000 UTC]

I had an Idea for Glomgold if you wish to revisit DuckTales

-Grimgold
Dark
He, like Scroogling, has aspirations of wealth; but his methods are more sneaky and underhanded.

-Glomgold
Dark
Never settling for second-best, his rivalry with Scrooge is unparalleled. He continues to use dirty tricks to increase his holdings.

-Gollumgold
Dark/Poison
His greed has consumed him, leaving him a disheveled and corrupted shell of a duck. Becoming the Richest Duck after Scrooge became Spooks has cost him everything that truly matters.

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

ReshiPlayz [2020-04-13 02:59:29 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

davidflowerswp [2020-04-12 16:52:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Venicequeen1011 In reply to davidflowerswp [2022-03-22 07:32:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gadgetphile In reply to davidflowerswp [2020-04-14 22:58:57 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

con1011 [2020-04-11 18:40:56 +0000 UTC]

Who’s older, Quiverlyn of Webby-Girl?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SuperShanko [2020-04-11 05:21:11 +0000 UTC]

Oh my god, yes!!😆

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Drachi-Dragojianer [2020-04-11 05:20:37 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

urzapw2000 [2020-04-11 03:37:44 +0000 UTC]

absolutely adorable!!!
wonderful picture!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Heretic1311 [2020-04-11 03:08:47 +0000 UTC]

Let´s get DANGEROUS!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>