Comments: 22
SplitTheSky [2011-06-23 11:26:21 +0000 UTC]
another good picture.
i notice that you've already been good with proportions back when you drew this. ^^
hmm, i'd like to add something to the discussion: There are various different forms of TF-'children' and it's also different for most universes:
Sparkling -> A TF-child in fanon-terms. Practically a small Transformer, like a human child. There is NO canon-background.
Hatchling -> What comes before a completed protoform, maybe the closest thing to a 'sparkling'. It's a protoform hatched in a container. When they're born those hatchlings are indeed little Transformer-children. Only the bay-verse has them and there is no information about how they are created -> [link]
Protoform -> The standard cybertronian body. When a new TF is manufactured, they all look the same -> [link]
TFs in the bayverse will revert to their protoform-state when they travel through space. Protoforms are canon in most universes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shinjuchan In reply to SplitTheSky [2011-06-23 22:10:49 +0000 UTC]
I haven't changed much, have I? *lol*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SplitTheSky In reply to Shinjuchan [2011-06-24 09:41:26 +0000 UTC]
maybe not in attitude, i wouldn't know xD
it's always good to see how the skill level of others increased over the years, it's motivating.
gives me hope of being as good sometime xD"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shinjuchan In reply to SplitTheSky [2011-06-25 02:52:33 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I'm very grateful I still have them. My work has changed so much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NiGhT-sTaLkEr13 In reply to Shinjuchan [2011-06-23 05:05:23 +0000 UTC]
Oh, it's just a word for child/baby in Cybertronian terms. It's the most popular term you would here for them around here, anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shinjuchan In reply to NiGhT-sTaLkEr13 [2011-06-23 05:16:42 +0000 UTC]
I've never heard of it before. Is it official or fan made? I use 'vornling'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NiGhT-sTaLkEr13 In reply to Shinjuchan [2011-06-23 05:32:07 +0000 UTC]
I think it was originally fan-made. TFA and Bayfilms use protoforms I believe, for children/their form underneath the armour]. I like vornling. It sounds better than sparkling. XD But it's pretty much what everyone in the TF fandom [here] knows them as [or at least the ones who write/draw sparklings].
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shinjuchan In reply to NiGhT-sTaLkEr13 [2011-06-23 05:51:18 +0000 UTC]
Really? o_0! I didn't know there were mech children in TFA at all. And they call them sparklings? Or do you mean fans who draw TFA or Bay call them sparklings? Either way I'll just stick to the 'vornling' if its all the same with you. I dunno, sparkling sounds too much like glitter. *lol*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shinjuchan In reply to NiGhT-sTaLkEr13 [2011-06-23 06:18:37 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I get it. Sadly, I've never been interested much in watching TFA so I wouldn't know the other part. I dunno, I don't care for the art style they chose to use.
Anyways, I'll stick with vornling. I've been using it for uses so why change it now, right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NiGhT-sTaLkEr13 In reply to Shinjuchan [2011-06-24 00:29:52 +0000 UTC]
TFA is surprisingly written quite well. I'm a massive fan of how Megatron and Shockwave were written, plus, Cory does Shocky's voice, AND Megatron's [which sounds VERY seductive]. Every scene they share is just spewing innuendo, it's great! Granted, some characters like Optimus were poorly portrayed, but it just depends on how you look at things. He's younger and never been through the Great War, so it's just kind of a different take. It's sort of slow at the beginning, but once it gets into it, it's pretty well done. Of course, each to their own, and I totally respect anyone else's decisions. But personally, I thought it was going to be a failure before I actually sat down and watched it and enjoyed the hell out of it. Just like with Transformers: Prime.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ShebaKoby In reply to Shinjuchan [2011-06-23 04:14:32 +0000 UTC]
that's a common (but confusing) fanon term for "baby" transformer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shinjuchan In reply to ShebaKoby [2011-06-23 04:18:50 +0000 UTC]
Never heard of it before. Is it an official term, or did someone make it up? See, cause I've always used 'vornling'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ShebaKoby In reply to Shinjuchan [2011-06-23 06:01:03 +0000 UTC]
I've seen it in fanfic, mostly by the younger kids. I think it's sort of like the Jedi term "Youngling" but instead of "young" they substitute "spark". Thus, Sparkling. It is most certainly not an official term, but it is fairly common in fanon in recent years.
Vornling makes more sense IMO, though personally I like to go with "cub", cuz that's how I roll. Seeker cub, Sweep cub, Autobot cub. And I did that long before Beast Wars came on the scene.
Did you ever see my Sweep cub art works?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shinjuchan In reply to ShebaKoby [2011-06-23 06:24:09 +0000 UTC]
Nah .. I'll just stick with the vornling. Sparkling sounds like a reference to glitter *lol*
I think I may have seen them, yes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ShebaKoby In reply to Shinjuchan [2011-06-23 18:46:01 +0000 UTC]
both the terms "youngling" and "sparkling" annoy me because yeah, glitter. (And also youngling sounds like an inherent redundancy).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shinjuchan In reply to ShebaKoby [2011-06-23 19:41:39 +0000 UTC]
Youngling sounds way to cliché for my taste. Sounds like someone had no imagination and just grabbed whatever. Apparently, the more descriptions I am receiving since I asked, sparkling is also overused.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ShebaKoby In reply to Shinjuchan [2011-06-24 02:35:12 +0000 UTC]
waaaaaaaaay overused, IMO. Yeah youngling is so cliche. "Vornling" sounds more practical. Because it's based on "Yearling" which is a real term that incorporates a period of time into it and doesn't sound awkward like Youngling does.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0