Comments: 33
visuasys [2005-02-14 22:45:13 +0000 UTC]
Awesome shit, I dont know why but i just love this one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
asphalt-resistance [2005-02-14 22:05:57 +0000 UTC]
It feels like roadkill during the winter
the muted tones pleases my eye, I commend
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mydeadpony [2005-02-14 14:21:58 +0000 UTC]
The faded effect should only be imho on the brighter parts and not totally on the black space if you see what i mean, or at least not that uniformely spread if my english is correct.
other than that, it's a cool moody potato roots piece (that's a compliment.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ekud [2005-02-14 08:21:08 +0000 UTC]
i love the forms, but the fade effect doesnt do it for me.
love your idea though!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dalla [2005-02-14 07:38:50 +0000 UTC]
sex, one of your best pieces.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Catastrofic [2005-02-14 04:39:06 +0000 UTC]
I love it. It has a dark, yet appealing feeling. Colors are nice as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cogwurx [2005-02-14 02:44:45 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful. I like the colors.
It's like a little glimpse inside a flower or a look underneath a garden.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ozzajw [2005-02-13 23:56:23 +0000 UTC]
i fail to see the resemblance between this and the work of weworkforthem , but i suppose you might have been inspired by the creativity of them? Anyways i really like the piece, and the way it seems vibrant and colourful despite the blurred dark areas and lack of black, which usually brings out other colours, and in itself is quite vivid. wonderful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dieguito [2005-02-13 21:43:40 +0000 UTC]
i quite like the desaturation of the image, first its different and better than looking at oversaturated images, it gives a very weird mood to the peice once desaturated almost dead and sullen but still very appealing, i think you did a good job man, atleast your thought process involved was unique, thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PaulTaylor [2005-02-13 16:37:48 +0000 UTC]
I thought the same as *Fenixgfx but after reading your reply to that, i see the point in it. Beautiful colours and work man.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
shocks In reply to PaulTaylor [2005-02-13 17:20:24 +0000 UTC]
thanks paul, i'm kinda getting into this whole thought of "the past" and how images didn't have quality in them and printing technology wasn't that evolved.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NanoCore [2005-02-13 14:40:31 +0000 UTC]
Very good organic work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shocks In reply to Fenixgfx [2005-02-13 15:43:03 +0000 UTC]
the original size is 1523 x 2035 Pixels and i'm glad you thought it was dingy and blurry, the whole point was bad quality
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shocks In reply to buzukie- [2005-02-13 15:35:22 +0000 UTC]
the original size was 1523 x 2035 Pixels, you don't need it any bigger than the size i chose to display here otherwise you'd have to scroll and then you loose the point of the image.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
buzukie- In reply to shocks [2005-02-13 16:14:39 +0000 UTC]
oh well, i get you point!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
spektakular [2005-02-13 11:04:04 +0000 UTC]
Your work --> fav. Always.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
olieviya [2005-02-13 10:52:51 +0000 UTC]
Looks like a party in the ground.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0