Comments: 54
magpiesmiscellany [2009-02-13 02:59:16 +0000 UTC]
Lovely texture and depth on this.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to magpiesmiscellany [2009-02-14 07:30:59 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I was trying to get a feeling of depth here, so I hope it worked.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Michelle56 [2008-04-08 02:54:49 +0000 UTC]
Its very beautiful! *looks it up on Wiki*
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to Michelle56 [2008-04-08 06:36:07 +0000 UTC]
I don't think it's there, though...
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
thomastapir [2008-04-04 20:38:18 +0000 UTC]
Watercolor on this guy, no? I love it...Did you duplicate the fish and then blur the copies for the background? Whatever you did, it's very effective--gives a real life-like fidelity to the foreground figure. Beautiful!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-05 07:00:12 +0000 UTC]
Right first time! Watercolor, then copy+paste, resize, and blur, inserting "wash" layers of blue between each fish.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
thomastapir In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-06 06:23:06 +0000 UTC]
re: wash layers--That's a really good idea! I wish I had thought of that for some of my recent color "aquatics," like the Aguana and Pteroskate. I'll have to try it next time...
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Sphenacodon In reply to elegaer [2008-04-05 06:58:42 +0000 UTC]
Dang! I knew I had forgotten something!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Zippo4k [2008-01-31 03:15:40 +0000 UTC]
Oh cool!
Very well done. I'm jealous!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
avancna [2008-01-29 15:49:48 +0000 UTC]
Is it related to Mene?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to avancna [2008-01-31 07:00:45 +0000 UTC]
Nope, this one's a beryciform and Mene is a perciform, at least from what I've heard...
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
avancna In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-01-31 07:05:46 +0000 UTC]
[link]
It seems, then, that I've mistaken Aipichthys with Aipichthyoides
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
avancna In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-01-31 07:23:07 +0000 UTC]
Sometimes, I wonder why scientists can't name species simple, yet distinctive names, like "Bob," "Deidre," or "Linda."
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
avancna In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-02-04 21:21:48 +0000 UTC]
It's a species of Boops
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
tentaculus [2008-01-29 14:00:53 +0000 UTC]
the details are marvelous. I can see clearly the squirrelfish influences in the colors and the texture.
hmm....I really wonder why deep-bodied, laterally compressed fishes are staple inhabitants of a coral reefs....something involving maneuverability I suppose ?
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
elegaer In reply to tentaculus [2008-02-29 19:28:10 +0000 UTC]
Manouevrability - they can go forwards and backwards in very small spaces. Reefs are very 3d environments, and that ability to change direction, go wherever and get out of wherever is a key adaptation.
You'll notice that a good few deep-bodied reef fishes also have extended mouth areas to make the most of this, getting food from relatively inaccessible places.
Deep-bodied fishes have been part of coral reef ecosystems since the Devonian. In all the fossil reef communities we know from that time onwards, there have been deep-bodied fishes of similar morphotypes occupying the same ecological niches, even though these fishes have changed dramatically in underlying anatomy over the millennia.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
elegaer In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-03-01 14:41:08 +0000 UTC]
Oh yes. Actually, one of the big themes of my PhD was exactly this - looking at the morphology of reef fishes through geological time. Especially deep-bodied one. It's fascinating.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to elegaer [2008-03-02 19:58:26 +0000 UTC]
Wow, you really know what you're talking about! My ichthyology book just scratches the surface. Thanks for the comment!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
anakdesa-baikhati [2008-01-29 08:35:52 +0000 UTC]
looks yummy. is it edible?
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
| Next =>