HOME | DD

Spikytastic β€” Not Creative... Stamp

Published: 2010-03-15 15:16:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 2853; Favourites: 121; Downloads: 24
Redirect to original
Description Word of advice:
If your character design literally hurts my eyes, then it's not creative, it's not "original", it's not good.
It's a bad design.

It's not creative to use the MS paint default colours and write "EDGY!!!" shit all over your stupid character, to make it look anorexic and to make everything look like a generic dog.

Sparkledogs.
Not "creative".
Just ugly as fuck.

Sparkledog doesn't just mean 'unnatural colours'. It's the bad design, it's the clashing colours (hell, my fursona is blue/yellow/white/black, but at least he doesn't burn retinas), and most of all? The self-important attitude.
Related content
Comments: 58

ThePirateBat In reply to ??? [2010-04-28 21:08:20 +0000 UTC]

I concur. I find simple designs much prettier than ΓΌbersparkle ones :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Anarance In reply to ThePirateBat [2010-04-28 21:11:03 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, like ~Gingastar18 's fursona is an example of colors done right... unfortunately, I cannot say that for many others.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

amymist In reply to ??? [2010-03-17 17:19:14 +0000 UTC]

Well, some I have could be considered overdone. *shrug* like Lakota...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ThePirateBat In reply to amymist [2010-03-17 19:11:31 +0000 UTC]

Nahh, I'm talking about stuff like: [link] [link] [link] [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

amymist In reply to ThePirateBat [2010-03-18 18:27:32 +0000 UTC]

Well, those are more scenedogs than sparkledogs. But I see what you're saying.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ThePirateBat In reply to amymist [2010-03-18 22:55:01 +0000 UTC]

yeah, I think the meaning has ended up changing though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

amymist In reply to ThePirateBat [2010-03-19 17:33:14 +0000 UTC]

Probably.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |