HOME | DD

SqueakingShoeless — Calla Lily

Published: 2005-06-08 14:51:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 1995; Favourites: 49; Downloads: 132
Redirect to original
Description I've seen so many people here with photos of calla lilies, and my immediate thought was that I'd never submit one because of the absolute plethora of them already here. However, my family, Josh and I decided to go to Vancouver BC last weekend and ended up at a park with a patch of them. It was raining and I had my camera with me; what did you think I was going to do?

At the very least, I think there are either no or very few photos of calla lilies in the rain.
Related content
Comments: 65

Nartemide [2009-06-17 12:10:06 +0000 UTC]

You've been featured here:
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to Nartemide [2009-07-10 18:00:16 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

retroxhug [2007-08-03 00:03:34 +0000 UTC]

Oh, nicely done. I love Calla lilies, they're my favorite

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to retroxhug [2007-08-03 04:42:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

euristis [2006-08-14 12:39:07 +0000 UTC]

Lilly with waterdrops ... mhum ... great shot, thx for sharing it with us

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to euristis [2006-08-14 16:54:13 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

renaissncebeaut [2006-05-14 05:14:29 +0000 UTC]

I love where you focused on the flower... in closeups like that, most would leave the back of flower out of focus, but you left the front unfocused. I also enjoy the plethora of raindrops.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to renaissncebeaut [2006-05-14 05:36:06 +0000 UTC]

I prefer focusing on the center of the flower in photos like this. It just feels more... balanced, I guess.

And yes, raindrops are so fun. I'm just glad it was raining.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jezunya [2005-10-10 23:33:03 +0000 UTC]

Wow, very pretty! You should make a print of this

!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to Jezunya [2005-10-11 06:11:02 +0000 UTC]

Oh, thank you! I will definitely be submitting this as a print as soon as I have the time to go and edit the full-size piece. I just bought a prints account today, so check back sometime over the next week if you wanted to add it to your wishlist or something. I promise I'll get right on it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jezunya In reply to SqueakingShoeless [2005-10-11 13:57:14 +0000 UTC]

Yay! ^__^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

phoenixtamer [2005-09-10 11:06:11 +0000 UTC]

hay this is a relly good shot i want to do somthing like this but slitly difront i was wondring haw did u get the black back drop (in photoshop or did you yous a black pees of paper?)

im so faving this

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to phoenixtamer [2005-09-11 02:34:33 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha thanks for the fave. Actually, all I did was take the photo and edit out the background in Adobe Photoshop. I couldn't actually do anything with the background when I took the photo because I took this one outside. If you want, you can ask =openxsky . She has quite a few photos of flowers with black backdrops too, though she might have done the same thing as me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

minniemae [2005-07-08 00:49:49 +0000 UTC]

Oh my GOSH! This is so PRETTY! O.O! If I were there, I bet I could see my reflection in the dew drops! ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SqueakingShoeless In reply to minniemae [2005-07-08 19:00:20 +0000 UTC]

PS. Thank you for the fave as well!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SqueakingShoeless In reply to minniemae [2005-07-08 18:51:27 +0000 UTC]

Thanks hon!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Epthumia [2005-07-06 06:37:09 +0000 UTC]

that is quite quite beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to Epthumia [2005-07-06 08:15:53 +0000 UTC]

Aww, thank you. See you in #Trivia later.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tessakitten [2005-06-29 07:30:08 +0000 UTC]

I think that the shot is very unique. The calla lily is gorgeous despite and probably because of its simplicity so it's obvious why everyone wants to photograph it but you're right, there are so many that most just fade into the background. The drops of water, however, are usually seen on roses or something and the crop of the picture + the white on black makes it stand out from the rest ^_^ Love it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to tessakitten [2005-06-29 07:31:40 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the lovely comment. It's nice to hear what's working well, even if there's no critique with it. Every little bit helps!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tessakitten In reply to SqueakingShoeless [2005-06-29 07:34:14 +0000 UTC]

well no critique necessary, m'dear ^_~! it's a thoroughly lovely shot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to tessakitten [2005-06-29 07:37:34 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GerbilEater [2005-06-10 12:26:22 +0000 UTC]

I didn't know they were called calla lilies. In Peru we call them cartuchos, which means "cartridges" (don't ask me why). There's some odd grey pixellation in the corners (except the bottom right). Otherwise it's a very nice shot, and you chose a good specimen!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SqueakingShoeless In reply to GerbilEater [2005-06-10 15:41:26 +0000 UTC]

Cartuchos hm? I'll have to remember that.

I think the grey pixelation you're seeing might just be a bit of bleed from the pixel border or something. I don't see it and my screen sucks, so it might also be your screen. I'll have to keep a lookout for it next time I use a different computer, I guess. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GerbilEater In reply to SqueakingShoeless [2005-06-10 15:49:16 +0000 UTC]

It could be... I've had the same thing happen, I think due to JPEG compression. In such cases I just blur it away with Fireworks. But it's not immediately obvious, so it doesn't matter really.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to GerbilEater [2005-06-10 15:52:52 +0000 UTC]

Actually I avoided .jpg compression for this photo because the file was small enough to just leave it as a .png. It's true that does happen with JPEGs, but it shouldn't be happening here. Oh well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GerbilEater In reply to SqueakingShoeless [2005-06-10 16:00:46 +0000 UTC]

Now that I look at it again, it is actually quite visible, also around the edge of the flower (at the boundary with the black background). I doubt it's my screen, it's a 1024x768 TFT.

Does your camera actually save as PNG? Mine just does JPG, which is a bit of a shit, since my old one (an olympus) used to do TIFFs (but about 30 MB a picture, hehe).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to GerbilEater [2005-06-10 16:13:53 +0000 UTC]

It saves as JPEG, but I always edit in PNGs, and sometimes export in the same. I always hated TIFFs. Took forever to load.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GerbilEater In reply to SqueakingShoeless [2005-06-10 16:18:04 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I've started doing that too, since I noticed that even at the highest JPEG quality, it was still slightly inferior to PNG24.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to GerbilEater [2005-06-10 16:21:27 +0000 UTC]

Darn those JPEGs and their wonderfully small file size.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GerbilEater In reply to SqueakingShoeless [2005-06-10 16:23:07 +0000 UTC]

heh, yeah, it's difficult compromising size over quality, I hate having to make these decisions. My life is so hard!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to GerbilEater [2005-06-10 16:26:27 +0000 UTC]

I know! If only PNGs were a tiny bit smaller.

Or conversely, if JPEGs were a bit better quality.

I feel like a spoiled brat, complaining over this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GerbilEater In reply to SqueakingShoeless [2005-06-10 16:30:49 +0000 UTC]

hah, that's what I was thinking. And being a bit of a geek.

Sometimes I miss the excitement of taking a roll of film to be developed and passing the glossy prints around for people to see. Though if they came out a bit shit it could be quite disappointing. But, since I'm a bit of a geek, I like manipulating my digital ones, so I'll stick with digital.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to GerbilEater [2005-06-10 16:32:16 +0000 UTC]

Agreed. Glossy prints are fun (if I get to see them first, of course), but digital beats all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GerbilEater In reply to SqueakingShoeless [2005-06-10 16:39:28 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, and it's beating Kodak to death. They aren't too happy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to GerbilEater [2005-06-10 16:42:23 +0000 UTC]

Too bad they didn't get into digital cams until it was so late in the game. They could have had a healthy share in it if they had come into it earlier.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SqueakingShoeless In reply to GerbilEater [2005-06-10 15:40:15 +0000 UTC]

Cartuchos hm? I'll have to remember that.

I think the grey pixelation you're seeing might just be a bit of bleed from the pixel border or something. I don't see it and my screen sucks, so it might also be your screen. I'll have to keep a lookout for it next time I use a different computer, I guess. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DailyDeath [2005-06-09 18:23:13 +0000 UTC]

So you photoshoped the background out and added a black background? Wow.. it just looks perfect. I just wish the water droplets looked a bit sharper. I admire the drops that go against the background. Its simple yet so incredibly beautiful. God makes so many wonderful things. I honestly havent seen one around here on dA. At least.. not one as good as thing.

Stunning.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to DailyDeath [2005-06-10 03:20:33 +0000 UTC]

Actually, I just used the lasso feature in PS and selected the background- then manipulated it a few different ways to turn the selected area black. I could have done it other ways, but I just didn't think of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GeodeLady [2005-06-09 07:53:02 +0000 UTC]

Great detail on the waterdrops and the striations in the petal.....A lovely capture indeed I just wish the stamen could have been in just as good of focus as the rest but, still a great capture none-the-less:0


I thought you might like this [link] it shows just some of the different colors that Calla Lilies come in

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to GeodeLady [2005-06-09 15:46:59 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, macro functions are just crappy, in my experience. Very few of them are very good at all unless you've got an actual macro lens (and it's a good one). Beyond that, it's hard to get a great macro, no matter how good it is.

Thanks so much though! I love the orange calla lilies- if only I could find some now!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GeodeLady In reply to SqueakingShoeless [2005-06-09 17:34:59 +0000 UTC]

I love macros my favorite type of photography but, yeah you are right

No problem I thought you might like the variety.....I thought they only came in white up till two years ago when I went in search of one for a gift for my sons teacher. Thats when I discovered the purple/violet ones They are hard to find they come in to the stores after the white ones. The white are pretty but, they always kinda look dirty to me whereas the colored ones don't get the dirty look. :laughing; once again prattling on so sorry

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to GeodeLady [2005-06-10 15:48:32 +0000 UTC]

Don't worry about prattling. I like having conversations by comment- it makes things more fun.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

undiscoveredledgend [2005-06-09 07:53:02 +0000 UTC]

Wow, Jess. I am stunned! I've been avidly awaiting your next post, and my waiting was obviously not in vain.

P.S. This is beautiful, if I didn't make myself clear before

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to undiscoveredledgend [2005-06-09 15:48:34 +0000 UTC]

Aww, thanks Jess! I'm in the process of preparing a few more works (at least) for submission, so hopefully you won't have to wait too much longer for more.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rinedet [2005-06-08 21:50:59 +0000 UTC]

Ooooh!
A Calla Lily! My favorite flower~ (I like the violet ones better, but hey)
Lovely shot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to rinedet [2005-06-09 00:16:03 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Hehe I had no idea they came in different colors. Glad you like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArtlessHmmmm [2005-06-08 18:42:49 +0000 UTC]

Take it you photoshoped (or similar) the lilly to get black stemless background!

I do like the water droplets on the Lilly - some have so much detail you can see the air bubbles in the midddle! Now that IS cool. Like how on the right you can see the outside of the flower - but wid that cut off and then none on the front/left it seems a little unbalanced. But then - i'm fussy!

Overall cool shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SqueakingShoeless In reply to ArtlessHmmmm [2005-06-09 00:17:42 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I used APSCS2 to lasso the background and darken it. It didn't take very much work, since it was already pretty dark, but it turned out well all the same.

Thanks for the great comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtlessHmmmm In reply to SqueakingShoeless [2005-06-09 22:51:28 +0000 UTC]

he he - pleasure - comments...... i just urm get.. carried away shall we say! But then this is not a bad thing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>