Comments: 18
RudyVasquez [2007-09-16 15:43:54 +0000 UTC]
Lovely piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
redwoodtwig [2005-09-25 04:01:36 +0000 UTC]
Haven't looked at the photo, yet. This is stunning by itself, a mood piece with real impact. Oh, I can wonder why she's holding it with her left hand, unusual for eastern sword arts; and holding it in a way no swordsman would, though a sword polisher might.
After looking at the photo, I like your rendition better, especially your treatment of her upper hand, make much more sense than laying the fingers on a blade that should be so sharp it would cut them.
thank you,
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cabul-Noir [2005-03-22 12:34:10 +0000 UTC]
that pose is really stunning seems to entise you to think as the person in the image however the silk could use the odd harder highlight in the very fine folds.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
piervitbari [2004-12-29 14:38:14 +0000 UTC]
I really like your work on that one original.......very good stacey!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
korpus [2004-12-11 18:30:54 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful piece! I really like the placement of the character on the lower side, and not centered. The thin, inside border matching the cloth really brings the pice together as a whole.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
onedaynight [2004-12-11 13:56:14 +0000 UTC]
well, it is a piece to be criticed.
what we can pick as a good work is clothes. they are welldone. what we can say as an improvement for those clothes that do add some texture like oriantation to make the cloth not be naked, or not just some dimentions with good light and shade analysis.
what i can say which need some improvment in my own opinion, that piece is not like others u made, it has lost the photorealism.. that not means it is bad, but i think it is still need some colors in skin, and some life in the face. the color of the face still alittle poor, and the shades didnt apply to tell the relation between the hand and the sword. beside the relation between her lips and the sword still not well managed. another factor which less the optical illusion to make that photo reality, that is the background. i guess it needs to be more life, and u need to give the feeling of deepth in it. may be more gradiants .. more colors needed. i am not sure.
but any way i can say in general i like this piece because u begin leaving the exact copy of photos, and u start instead to add some creativty from ur own for photos. this will make by time a very good and new atomsphere for ur work.
thank u
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stacey73 In reply to onedaynight [2004-12-11 16:43:40 +0000 UTC]
Ooooh thank you so much oneday I always appreciate comments like this because its usually difficult to get a fresh view on your work. There isn’t a single thing you had to say that I disagree with either, based upon my photo real work.
What I will say however ( and again, this is not a defense from your comments, more in addition to them) that while I do often attempt to gain a likeness to a photograph, there are time when a looser, more Illustrative style to my paintings ( see David by request, Sonoma etc) because.. well to be honest its fun
In this case however, when I had first requested to paint this work, my intention was indeed to follow the photograph. I love the colors in that photo probably more than I ought to *g* Yet when speaking to Jen ( the photographer) she made mention that she assumed it would be different than the photo, so that was what I set out to do. Hence the looser, flatter appearance. The attempt was to use the photo as a launch point for a complete departure from my normal style. Photo real is usually easier for me because all the information about the image is right there. I can spawn a color pallet within Painter to match the colors of the photo exactly, and work from there.
( if anyone uses painter and doesn’t know that trick and would like to, let me know )
That said.. I found your comment very useful for a great number of reasons. Not the least being that I do eventually intend on leaving photo real behind for a time ( too many portraits, you know?) and actually attempt a more fantasy based and surreal based theme. Though I confess the idea scares me a bit It's always nice to stick to what you know *g* And your imput can be very readily applied as I work towards those goals as well.
Things I would have done differently in -this- image?
mmm.. the background comes to mind first. The face is as I intended as well, but the reflection (gahh I suck at ground planes and reflections unless I can SEE them clearly.. and even them ground planes mock me) on her sword bothers me, as does her lips as you mentioned.
Her kimono.. I pondered the notion of going back in and adding the pattern back tot eh fabric when I had finished the base.. but it seemed out of place when compared to the rest of the image. Now, I’m wondering if it wouldn’t have provided an interesting focal point.
And yes, there are a few areas that really would have benefited from more accurate shading.
So while the style turned out the way I wanted it. The technical of the style did not. However, now that I have done a departure from the original, perhaps it would be acceptable to Jen if I were to go back and attempt the photo real appearance that works easier for me?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
onedaynight In reply to Stacey73 [2004-12-12 13:47:39 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for ur honest reply
yeah to spawn a color pallet within Painter to match the colors of the photo exactly, and work from there is an interesting experince for me.. u select the image and go to color set, then creat color set from the selection. it is a very good thing from painter u know.
i would like to know more about the tricks u know and i tell u wot i know if i even has any useful info about it u know.
i would like tell u my own opinion about the realism of the photo, or u can say suggestion of wot u may do in it, but actually if it belong to suggestions i would prefer u make it as u do a photorealism, but u can change the colors. or the texture of cloth, even hair style to another japanise style u can find alot of them on google search images so u copy a hair of a pic in this pic by painting. etc
good job, i wish it finish the way u like and happy with. i added ur avatar to my journal btw as a friend if u approve me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
onedaynight In reply to onedaynight [2004-12-12 13:51:12 +0000 UTC]
Sorry i forgot to say something: i told u about the technique of how to make a color set like the photo for a reason :To ask Is it the same technique u use or u have a better way? I just forgot to write that
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stacey73 In reply to onedaynight [2004-12-12 18:54:24 +0000 UTC]
*nods* Yep, I capture a pallet the very same way Though once I have my set, I go through the image with the eye drop tool and click on the primary focal points in the image and drop those colors down on a new temp document. Once that's been done, I go through my color pallet and I'll delete any non essential color.
Spawning a color pallet is wonderful, but it can also be confusing if you let it. The program will do exactly what you tell it to and copy every single color when in reality, all you require are your primaries (proof them against your temporary document) and a handful of your secondary colors. I tend to keep my main colors, a small group of mid colors and a small group of highlights; I DO always make sure that my pallet contains my darkest dark, and my lightest light color. If I don’t, then I end up making my darks a little too light and my highlights get overblown.
I've heard about the manner of painting you've described, and admire the skill that is required to pull it off. I've not attempted it, truth be told.. and I haven’t any high hopes of managing it if I -do- try, but it may prove to be a temptation at some point, so be kind if I screw it up beyond repair *g*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1