HOME | DD

tchaikovsky2 — A good moo

#adorkable #anthro #bovine #calf #child #cow #cub #cute #female #freckles #girl #hair #highlandcow #iceland #icelandic #pets #petting #ruffled #ruffling #young #smol #fjóla
Published: 2017-10-09 19:43:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 27332; Favourites: 128; Downloads: 137
Redirect to original
Description 10/10 would ruffle hair. See example above.

A birthday gift for a dear frænd. Very surprised by how well I've managed to minimize the hair clipping! XD

Enjoy!


Hey, you! Like anthro highland cows? Then why don't you
check out more pictures with Fjóla (and Hjalta) over HERE ?


Related content
Comments: 18

WhIppIng-b0y [2019-04-13 10:07:53 +0000 UTC]

Oh my gosh

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TallEars23 [2017-10-29 14:10:20 +0000 UTC]

Awwwww 

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

AndyBeguito [2017-10-19 00:15:00 +0000 UTC]

Wow!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Smudge-Proof [2017-10-12 12:41:48 +0000 UTC]

A good moo is hard to find.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Smudge-Proof [2017-10-12 12:19:40 +0000 UTC]

Very nice hair.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Randochi [2017-10-12 01:41:18 +0000 UTC]

I met a Hyland cow recently.  I did the same thing.  But your version is a lot cuter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

totuio [2017-10-10 16:39:44 +0000 UTC]

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Juliusrabbito [2017-10-09 19:45:07 +0000 UTC]

little warining, this is cute but if she is underage, DA is banning this content bad. this week 3 users i watched got suspended

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BenTheVaporeon In reply to Juliusrabbito [2017-10-09 19:50:44 +0000 UTC]

there are no mature parts showing though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Juliusrabbito In reply to BenTheVaporeon [2017-10-09 20:12:11 +0000 UTC]

exactly. but in others i saw them i like it, i love this gallery, dont get me wrong, except one of them didnt show anything wrong in most, just simple drawings and boom banned, DA is being rough this week

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ghostpepperwolf In reply to Juliusrabbito [2017-10-09 22:40:05 +0000 UTC]

Artistic nudity = fine
Sexual nudity = not fine
What this artist is doing is artistic nudity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Juliusrabbito In reply to Ghostpepperwolf [2017-10-09 22:43:39 +0000 UTC]

i will say what you just said because is true

Artistic nudity = fine 
Sexual nudity = not fine
What this artist is doing is artistic nudity.


then me

underage Artistic nudity ≠ fine to DA, no matter how innocent or censored 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ghostpepperwolf In reply to Juliusrabbito [2017-10-09 23:07:30 +0000 UTC]

Welp that's your opinion. I'm underage so that's prob why I have no problem with it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Juliusrabbito In reply to Ghostpepperwolf [2017-10-09 23:20:18 +0000 UTC]

its not my opinion is DA's opinion they wont allow it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Randochi In reply to Juliusrabbito [2017-10-12 01:37:11 +0000 UTC]

What are DeviantArt policies on nudity?

Submissions depicting nudity are allowed providing that the model is eighteen (18) years of age or older and providing that the image is not determined to be obscene or pornographic as detailed elsewhere in the FAQ.

All images containing nudity must be tagged as Mature Content upon submission. The DeviantArt staff reserves the right to mark any work with a general mature content tag if it is deemed by that staff member to require one.

Tchai has not given an age for this character.  We can assume she looks underage, but we can't confirm cause she's a cow and not 100% human.  We can't entirely judge based on her human physique.  But I would like to point out a few things.  Fjola (her name) appears shirtless.  But there are no anatomically suggestive features on display.  She doesn't have nipples.  AND nipples are a huge problem with today's society.   So if she doesn't have nipples then there isn't any suggestive content on display that would warrant a mature tag.  Also we can't say this is sexually suggestive because it just shows an adult cow's arm (Hjalta, her older sister) ruffling her (Fjola's) hair.  This hair ruffle depiction is typically a playful social interaction between an older individual to a younger individual or can be a tall individual to a short individual.  Another example could be seen as a supportive gesture.  A mentor (wrestling coach) ruffling the hair of a student because they won the match.

Tchai has not shown anything that would violate dA's policies on nudity.

This image does NOT include nude, erotic, explicit and/or pornographic messages that physically or sexually exploit the character depicted. There is no sexual connotation going on in this photo nor can you see anything that would be considered physically or sexually explicit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Juliusrabbito In reply to Randochi [2017-10-12 02:12:40 +0000 UTC]

ou dont need to give age and it doesnt have to be sexual or erotic, one of my OCS got deleted for just  her looks and she is an anthro,not even human and one of my human ocs has been removed as well, and none of it its sexual or anything, just naked

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Randochi In reply to Juliusrabbito [2017-10-12 22:47:55 +0000 UTC]

I can't really compare your work to Tchai's cause I've not seen the photos you say have been deleted.  I sourced DA's policy and gave my conclusion to why this photo doesn't violate the policy.  If you believe your work was falsely deleted, I suggest Contacting the DeviantArt Help Desk  about the issue.  I would be cautious about the content that is posted referring to full nude characters as well.  If there is an issue, you need to make it obvious that the character depicted isn't shown in a suggestive manner.  "Suggestive" in this context is nude.  I have seen artists who have run into situations like what you explained and they had to put a censor bar over the groin and chest even though there was nothing there.  That situation is a grey area to the rules and it has shown varied results.

Tchai is very aware of the policies that involve their work. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Juliusrabbito In reply to Randochi [2017-10-12 23:33:16 +0000 UTC]

its not my work is other artists work... ill note  you one

👍: 0 ⏩: 0