Comments: 79
Tzoli In reply to ??? [2020-07-12 15:06:44 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
KKP1234 [2020-01-24 23:07:52 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to KKP1234 [2020-01-25 09:21:58 +0000 UTC]
I feel you do not believe me that the ships I draw are original and not just creations of a mind.
For these I had information from the original sketch drawings, a few Hungarian Naval Enthusiasts, a book and few articles.
π: 0 β©: 0
TheLordTaxus [2017-11-09 01:20:01 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful class of ships. So poorly used and wasted.
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to TheLordTaxus [2017-11-09 09:06:51 +0000 UTC]
ou know these are only preliminary designs and not actual ships?
The Project VIII was used as a base for the final Viribus Unitis clas which was built.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheLordTaxus In reply to Tzoli [2017-11-11 04:20:55 +0000 UTC]
Yes. But the Viribus Unitus was like the South Carolina class and superior in its main
armaments layout than the Dreadnought's layout.
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to TheLordTaxus [2017-11-11 08:31:27 +0000 UTC]
No. Viribus Unitis is more like the Gangut or Dante Alighieri class but with superfiring turrets
π: 0 β©: 1
TheLordTaxus In reply to Tzoli [2017-11-11 11:50:47 +0000 UTC]
What are the differences between the South CarolinasΒ and Viribus Unitis besides the extra four guns it carried? I know the SC class is sometimes called a 'super' pre-dreadnought because of its inferior speed.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to TheLordTaxus [2017-11-11 15:32:44 +0000 UTC]
Viribus Unitis is more modern, larger, heavier more heavily armed both main guns and secondary guns wise. It's faster though shorter ranged and had thinner belt but thicker deck armour. Engine too is more modern using Parsons steam turbines instead of Vertical Tripel Expansion engines. Better hull shape and different armour layout. The Viribus Unitis could be called a flush deck with some superstructure on the main deck while the South Carolina has a massive or fully built in superstructure between the turrets.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheLordTaxus In reply to Tzoli [2017-11-13 22:48:20 +0000 UTC]
So what is your opinion of the South Carolina class?
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to TheLordTaxus [2017-11-14 12:04:27 +0000 UTC]
I have no issues with it, a very conservative and traditional evolution of the Mississippi class, but I'M not an expert in USN designs. I will ask my friend about it.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheLordTaxus In reply to Tzoli [2017-11-15 00:23:32 +0000 UTC]
The Mississippi class was a failure.
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to TheLordTaxus [2017-11-15 15:29:25 +0000 UTC]
For the USN's fleet in being doctrine and for their main battlefleet yes, for Greece they were good ships.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheLordTaxus In reply to Tzoli [2017-11-18 02:15:08 +0000 UTC]
Until the Luftwaffe sank them.
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to TheLordTaxus [2017-11-18 09:02:12 +0000 UTC]
What did you expect from an old ship decommissioned used as a floating battery and barracks with very limited AA capacity?
π: 0 β©: 1
TheLordTaxus In reply to Tzoli [2017-11-19 02:33:19 +0000 UTC]
I thought they were active still.
π: 0 β©: 1
Siveir [2017-11-01 20:39:36 +0000 UTC]
Damn great job on the research of that! Very nice, very thorough.
π: 0 β©: 2
yamato74 In reply to Siveir [2017-11-03 08:33:59 +0000 UTC]
Nice work! It's a pity there is not much information available about never-were projects of ships, really love your works!
π: 0 β©: 1
Siveir In reply to yamato74 [2017-11-03 13:44:43 +0000 UTC]
I think that comment belongs to the author?
π: 0 β©: 1
yamato74 In reply to Siveir [2017-11-03 15:54:19 +0000 UTC]
Indeed but I make the same researches because i build 3d models of never-were ships, and believe me it's sometimes very difficult to get hands on reliable information.
π: 0 β©: 1
FRIEND711 [2017-10-23 09:39:04 +0000 UTC]
coool XD
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to FRIEND711 [2017-10-23 13:21:56 +0000 UTC]
thx
π: 0 β©: 1
FRIEND711 In reply to Tzoli [2017-10-24 00:48:40 +0000 UTC]
NP! nice job! love what you did here ;3
π: 0 β©: 0
Avarus-Lux In reply to Tzoli [2017-10-16 07:50:49 +0000 UTC]
Ok, hmmmm, maybe the description of these being alternate history designs with some mix and match ideas from the various axis forces implemented fits better then "variants"
Looking forward to how these will turn out.
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to Avarus-Lux [2017-10-16 10:53:42 +0000 UTC]
You will see when I finish them, (16 altogether)
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to Avarus-Lux [2017-11-04 17:45:43 +0000 UTC]
Yes design target was 20.000tons but Viribus Unitis came out 20.014tons standard, of course fitting out if taken the same operation as on other navies were done after launch on the other hand future refits and repair works might need the full capacity of the drydock.
π: 0 β©: 0
eltf177 [2017-09-20 19:06:19 +0000 UTC]
Just keeps getting better and better...
π: 0 β©: 1
AngelisGoodwen [2017-09-15 12:37:47 +0000 UTC]
Are this pre-WW1 ships?
π: 0 β©: 1
AngelisGoodwen In reply to Tzoli [2017-09-15 12:51:11 +0000 UTC]
I thought so!Β They're very cool, I kind of draw so insiration from the ships of the Spanish American War to Post WW2 for my own ships.
π: 0 β©: 1
Tzoli In reply to AngelisGoodwen [2017-09-15 13:17:28 +0000 UTC]
I draw mostly never-were designs or preliminaries of WW2 Interbellum or occasionally Cold War and WW1 warships
π: 0 β©: 1
AngelisGoodwen In reply to Tzoli [2017-09-15 13:37:17 +0000 UTC]
That cool!Β I just design starships.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>