Comments: 11
Verdokai In reply to barmark [2012-05-16 20:25:20 +0000 UTC]
thanks!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
w176 [2010-12-28 22:32:40 +0000 UTC]
Have i hold you how much I like you crosshatching? Yeah. I know. I have. But still. <3
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
wiccanbear [2010-10-20 04:01:25 +0000 UTC]
hey hun, you asked for a critque but i are to poor for the membership lol! but heres what i think of this.
the style is amazing! the pen and ink looks very good. the only thing i have to say ont he pen and ink is look up a few more stroke directions and textures. these one seem to be over repetative in use. just scribbles and straight lines. i know! you could add so much more depth to it than you did here. i've seeny our work and i know you can. you're just that good. the way that you have it with just the two or three textures make it look lazy.
next is the image itself. which is just F'in awsome. it has a very post appocaliptical feel and your blanance of white and black is exceptional and lends a very good "dark feeling" whith out making it "dark to look at".
your movement factor on the lamps droop is exepcional as is the "hint" of fire in the buildings, and the blowing of the smoke.
the only other thing i would think to add or change is oyu do have an expance of "white" between the boy and the lamp. i would put somehting there. its empty and throws the over all balance off. but its perfict if you were planing on putting like a poem or a picture focus point of color there. but if you do do that i would move the boy to his left maybe 1/2 inch to really bring full balance to the picture.
all in all after seeing what i have of your work i'd give this a 7 out of 10. its lovely and i really dig this style and i hope you keep at it!
i would also adore! seeing it.... expanded. yeah. that'd be sweet!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Verdokai In reply to wiccanbear [2010-10-20 07:08:20 +0000 UTC]
Haha, I didn't realise not everybody can -give- critique. I thought even non-paying members could at least pitch in, just not use the system to ask for it? Ah well anyway, we all learn something new... Thanks anyway *^_^*
There is a large emptiness in all the images in this set, because there will be text Not a poem or anything, as I said this is page one, but descriptive text. It's basically a picture book. And I can't move anything anywhere on this particular image, because it's pen and ink So maybe it's a bit suboptimal asking for critique on these images, since I can't well change anything with them, but hey, I wanted to give the system a go and I like hearing stuff worth thinking about
Maybe some more depth could be nice. However I wanted the first page as clean as possible, and almost as flat, to give some depth when we zoom in and get to see things at street level rather than from a long way away, if that makes sense? Hopefully it'll make sense with the next pics, where I tried to do just that, though I'm not sure I liked them as much as the simpler pictures in this series, so hmmm...
However, page 2 is up now if you want to give that a go too
[link]
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Towerjunkie [2010-10-19 09:43:00 +0000 UTC]
I love it, you've got your own style and it looks very maintainable in terms of a whole story.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Verdokai In reply to Towerjunkie [2010-10-20 00:55:02 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I struggled with it a few pages down the line, but eventually I think it straightened itself out.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
goken114 [2010-10-19 06:32:11 +0000 UTC]
wow this is a really interesting picture i like it
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Verdokai In reply to goken114 [2010-10-19 07:00:43 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0