Comments: 81
tterrag7991 [2011-01-20 22:55:28 +0000 UTC]
Great photo. Is that a massey harris machine in the bacground
π: 0 β©: 1
WayneBenedet In reply to PsychoBudgie [2011-01-19 14:22:54 +0000 UTC]
this particular image was processed using HDR tools. However, I do not like many of the effects of HDR processing, like the colour shifts and visual effects, so my use of these tool is very circumspect
π: 0 β©: 1
WayneBenedet In reply to PsychoBudgie [2011-01-19 14:44:33 +0000 UTC]
I kind of felt I needed to say how I had processed the image because it is so different from what I usually do. The other thing is that people often think that I do HDR. In my first show opening I overheard a "photographer" explaining to his friends that my prints were HDR. It amused me.
π: 0 β©: 1
WayneBenedet In reply to PsychoBudgie [2011-01-20 14:38:26 +0000 UTC]
indeed there is. One of the things I find is that people want to compare equipment. I find it degenerates into: "my lens is bigger than your lens". So I don't usually discuss equipment in terms of make. Last Friday I was being interviewed at the show opening and I was asked what kind of equipment I used. I said I never discussed that. I did not expect the question and I don't think I handled it well. I hope it gets edited out.
I bought a digital camera in about 2001 for an organization i was working with. It was a 2.1 megapixel. I was impressed and felt that it was as good as most 35 mm film based cameras. But I still held off because I was using a 6x7 for my work. A back was available for this camera, at a cost of $17,000.00. Then in 2007 or so, 8 meg cameras became available. They were quite costly as I remember, but they began to perform better than most 35mm cameras, so I bough one. Now the higher end digital perform as well as medium format cameras so my 6x7 sits on a shelf. I still love it, but 20 pounds to take a picture is a lot of weight.
I have always viewed negatives as tools rather than as finished products, but I never felt that processing and printing in the film world gave me the control I wanted. The move to digital was a real stretch for me, but it has worked. I like the total control I have over my work now as compared to film.
I think you last point is the crux of the matter. People tend to think that it is the camera that makes the picture.... but it is not. I have seen so many people with expensive cameras who never learn how to use them, that I tell my students.... learn to use that you have... learn the strengths and weaknesses and suck everything you can out of what you have... don't spend more money. It seems you are doing that... andit is a good thing.
π: 0 β©: 1
WayneBenedet In reply to PsychoBudgie [2011-01-21 15:02:57 +0000 UTC]
Often it is out of circumstance... not choice. But regardless, the results is the same. I have been in both situations, where I did not have the money to get better equipment, and where I did.
Back in the 70's when I got into this game of art, i stared painting. I had a small camera but nothing to speak of. I bought a better camera so that I could take pictures to use as reference for painting. In the process I learned how challenging photography was, and I never painted again. Now that I have control over my work, it feels very much like painting again and I can bring out the elements that I want to and suppress others. So for myself, it is the issue of challenge too that keeps me going and learning.
And this is perhaps my point about the equipment. There has to be something more than the equipment if one is going to grow and develop. (At least that is my observation... for what it is worth). I have seen too many people who have the resources to buy the best equipment, believing that this will make them into a photographer. They spend all their time researching the next camera and lens, and don't have time to develop the art. Then there are those folks who can't afford every new camera that comes onto the market. Some of them give up, but some of them decide to get the best out of what they have. They concentrate on the art and learning to get the best out of what they have. In my mind.... this person is the most fortunate... though it may not feel that way, and they are the ones most likely to develop real photographic skill and understanding of the process and lens dynamics.
It all reminds me of a series of articles I wrote here on magnification and lens dynamics. My point was that lenses don't really magnify... at least not in the way that we suppose. Any way some folks took serious issue with me, and one decided that name calling was a good tactic. He called me an amateur (though he did not use that word). What i fund most amusing about that series of articles, is that the science was correct... (Perhaps I could have done a better job with the language). But some people are so stuck on their individual understanding of a small part of the art, that they miss or don't have any concept of the bigger picture. One guy wanted to argue the point from a large format perspective. In trying to prove to me that he knew what he was talking about, he only proved that he did not. Now I don't claim to know all there is about photography, but I have trained at the college level, I have spent 35 years working with cameras of all sizes shapes and forms, and I teach at a college in a program that is growing every year, and I am the only instructor. And after all of this.... I stand by what I say. It is not the camera that makes the art. It is the photographer, and a good photographer can make are with a fixed lens point and shoot camera.
Having tooted my horn now.... I do very much agree that pixel envy is a hard thing to overcome. So keep learning the art for now... you will eventually get the pixels you want and need... and when that happens, you will be ready to suck the most that you can out of that too.
π: 0 β©: 0
DrAlexTGizmotiki [2010-05-22 20:00:28 +0000 UTC]
This is the kind of elusive image that keeps haunting me, now I have more imagery to build on as I search for even MORE!! Thanks!
π: 0 β©: 1
DrAlexTGizmotiki In reply to WayneBenedet [2010-05-22 23:28:04 +0000 UTC]
Imma all over this site and the wild world web! I was busy with other things, and neglected CARZ!! and truckz.
No more! Soon I will post some, when I get rolling with my HP850 digiZooM!!
Look out!
π: 0 β©: 0
yankeedog [2010-03-03 18:11:19 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful photo! There is a real sadness to it.
-YD
π: 0 β©: 1
WayneBenedet In reply to yankeedog [2010-03-03 19:17:59 +0000 UTC]
thanks.
I think many of my images affect people in that way. To me though, I rarely feel that way about them.
π: 0 β©: 1
yankeedog In reply to WayneBenedet [2010-03-03 22:48:21 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome. I always feel a sadness when I see old rusty abandoned cars, trucks or locomotives.
-YD
π: 0 β©: 0
WayneBenedet In reply to QuanticChaos1000 [2009-12-10 14:28:42 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Ryan,
No idea on the last part. Probably just the cost of getting it there.
π: 0 β©: 0
horai [2009-11-24 20:45:34 +0000 UTC]
She was a beauty in her day.
π: 0 β©: 0
tailsanger [2009-11-24 00:11:45 +0000 UTC]
you should get it some how, mercury trucks i kinda rare a little work it my ok ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
alimuse [2009-11-23 02:06:54 +0000 UTC]
Nice work, Wayne!
π: 0 β©: 0
retro2k [2009-11-22 15:41:53 +0000 UTC]
Great find again Wayne!
π: 0 β©: 1
jeepdork [2009-11-22 15:24:44 +0000 UTC]
great find! that thing is worth quite a bit being a mercury panel truck, don't think they made very many. looks great for being underwater.
π: 0 β©: 1
WayneBenedet In reply to jeepdork [2009-11-22 16:00:57 +0000 UTC]
thanks,
I have no idea of the relative value of the vehicles I find. I am not really into restoring them myself, but I do like how the look hanging on a gallery wall printed on canvas,
π: 0 β©: 1
jeepdork In reply to WayneBenedet [2009-11-22 23:24:35 +0000 UTC]
i love the look of them on a gallery wall as well as driving them down the road.
everything you see is the conception of an artist.
π: 0 β©: 0
erene [2009-11-22 11:54:52 +0000 UTC]
Very nice work Wayne!
π: 0 β©: 1
WayneBenedet In reply to erene [2009-11-22 15:56:39 +0000 UTC]
thank you
π: 0 β©: 1
rajeshvj [2009-11-22 06:06:37 +0000 UTC]
Nice work! Where did you spot this?
π: 0 β©: 1
WayneBenedet In reply to rajeshvj [2009-11-22 15:54:47 +0000 UTC]
location is in the comments.
π: 0 β©: 0
Jeffinitely [2009-11-22 04:27:34 +0000 UTC]
ooooooh. gotta one up me huh? hahaha. it's better than my old oldie car in the woods shot... yours has leaves all over it...
nice find.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>