Description
Cynognathus is one of the best-known proto-mammals. Its scientific name means 'dog-jaw'. It was really getting towards the mammalian condition: it had a secondary palate, and could thus breathe while chewing; it had diversified teeth - incisors, canines and post-canines - and likely could chew its food well. It appears to have had a diaphragm, which would have made for more efficient breathing and a more active lifestyle. Its forelegs sprawled a bit, but its hindlegs were positioned upright, so it could run fairly well. There's no direct proof yet, but it very likely had fur and/or sensory whiskers. But it likely had no external ears, and laid eggs rather than giving live birth. Cynognathus reached a length of about 1.2 m with a relatively large skull. It lived in South Africa, South America and Antarctica, about 247-237 million years ago (the Triassic age).
Here you see it having caught a small archosaur. The tables would soon be turned: the archosaurs evolved into large predatory types, including the dinosaurs, and replaced the large proto-mammals. Cynognathus itself was one of the last reasonably-big cynodont predators - until much later with the advent of the 'age of the mammals' after the extinction of the dinosaurs.
Comments: 16
bhut [2018-12-02 22:07:09 +0000 UTC]
Score one for the mammal ancestors.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WillemSvdMerwe In reply to bhut [2018-12-03 18:24:46 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for comment!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
acepredator [2018-12-02 21:59:11 +0000 UTC]
Predatory therapsids were on their last legs during the Early Triassic anyways.
I do get the mentality of mammalian supremacy is extremely frustrating but saying archosaurs outcompeted cynodonts isn’t any more realistic IMHO.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
MugenSeiRyuu In reply to acepredator [2018-12-03 21:26:37 +0000 UTC]
Well, they managed to fit better into the new environments, so they outcompeted them in a way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to MugenSeiRyuu [2018-12-04 01:50:56 +0000 UTC]
That’s the circumstances killing the therapsids, not the archosaurs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to MugenSeiRyuu [2018-12-04 14:57:26 +0000 UTC]
But then why did you support the idea of archosaurs outcompeting therapsids....?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MugenSeiRyuu In reply to acepredator [2018-12-04 15:22:02 +0000 UTC]
Because they did outcompete them thanks to their better adaptations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to MugenSeiRyuu [2018-12-04 23:42:20 +0000 UTC]
That’s not what happened. The environment killed off the cynodonts, not the archosaurs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MugenSeiRyuu In reply to acepredator [2018-12-05 00:01:54 +0000 UTC]
Obviously. Well, expect for that line leading to mammals. It was however the archosaur's superior adaptation that allowed them to surive while their rivals perished.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to MugenSeiRyuu [2018-12-05 01:03:53 +0000 UTC]
That’s not the same as outcompeting the opposition. That’s just being lucky enough that the new environment kills them but not you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
anasofiajc [2018-12-02 21:52:21 +0000 UTC]
Great!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1