Comments: 18
neves7771 [2012-10-28 13:12:46 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic racer - more pictures from all sides would be desirable to be able to imagine the vehicle.
gerard@talon.ch
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to neves7771 [2014-12-20 18:04:49 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I'm sure there are some photos of the actual car online somewhere that you can reference. These little race cars were pretty common in the 1930's.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
smvuy [2009-02-02 19:22:42 +0000 UTC]
a huge engine for such small car
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to smvuy [2009-02-03 18:17:13 +0000 UTC]
One of my Jeeps years ago had a 151 Cu In inline 4 cyl, it was such a strong engine, I thought it might be cool to have one in such a little car like the Bantam. I think the actual cubic displacement for a Bantam Racer was around 40 Cubic Inch.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
smvuy In reply to yankeedog [2009-02-03 21:21:07 +0000 UTC]
650 cc thats more expectable
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bear48 [2008-12-17 05:35:32 +0000 UTC]
Well done
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to bear48 [2008-12-17 13:37:11 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Bear!
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
duraluminwolf [2008-12-16 16:47:22 +0000 UTC]
You've really got a thing for Bantams at the moment, haven't you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kenpoist [2008-12-15 00:43:39 +0000 UTC]
Sweet Don!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to kenpoist [2008-12-15 13:18:54 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Buff!
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lyle462 [2008-12-14 20:24:02 +0000 UTC]
Nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to Lyle462 [2008-12-15 13:20:19 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Lyle!
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lyle462 In reply to yankeedog [2008-12-16 15:44:23 +0000 UTC]
You betcha!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nes03 [2008-12-14 20:11:50 +0000 UTC]
Awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to nes03 [2008-12-15 13:22:51 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0