Comments: 35
electronicdevise [2011-03-13 21:11:59 +0000 UTC]
This picture is amazing! It seems like in 3D, how did you do this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to electronicdevise [2011-03-15 09:59:21 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I start by drawing a very tight clipping path around the car and then copy and past the car onto a new layer, next I duplicate base layer and gaussian blur that layer. Then I take the eraser tool, increase the brush size to the maximum size and erase the foreground of the blurred layer allowing the base layer to show through in focus. Other than some color correcting and saturation adjustments, that's basically it. I do most of my car photos like this because when shooting at car shows people are always walking into shots, so I blur them and the seem less intrusive and don't take away from the subject of the photo, the car. In this shot there are uninteresting vehicles in the background. They call this the "bokeh effect", it can be achieve with the camera on some subjects, but whole cars are too big.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yankeedog In reply to Kerong [2010-11-08 16:02:03 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Keron! They were cool cars. I always wanted a '55-57 2 door Buick, any model, but preferably the Roadmaster! Sort of like the Rat Rod 57 Belair idea I had? That would be too cool!
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mister-Lou [2010-06-19 18:23:27 +0000 UTC]
you might want to check this out: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to Mister-Lou [2010-06-19 19:05:53 +0000 UTC]
Wow! That is pretty! Thanks for the link!
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mister-Lou In reply to yankeedog [2010-06-19 21:22:58 +0000 UTC]
no problem,everytime i see one it reminds me of my Dad's 54,which is sadly resting at its home since the owner died months ago.if i had the money i would buy his car.miss you,Dad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to Mister-Lou [2010-06-20 13:09:29 +0000 UTC]
Maybe you could work out some sort of payment plan to buy it back? It would be a shame to see someone else get it.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mister-Lou In reply to yankeedog [2010-06-21 23:59:42 +0000 UTC]
i'd love to buy it but alas,i don't have a job.and it looks like they're going through it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mister-Lou In reply to yankeedog [2010-10-13 06:39:53 +0000 UTC]
here's an update of the Buick we're selling: the asking price is 10,000 dollars.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to Mister-Lou [2010-10-14 22:58:16 +0000 UTC]
I wish I had the money, I love those old Buicks.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mister-Lou In reply to yankeedog [2010-06-23 03:20:43 +0000 UTC]
dunno the price yet,i'm estimating about 7,500 or so.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yankeedog In reply to QBit71 [2009-11-11 21:41:22 +0000 UTC]
With all the mud caked all over the front end, I'm guessing it was submerged in water, there an overall film on the car. The shop that has the car does restoration work so I hope to get some after shots of it someday.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
QBit71 In reply to yankeedog [2009-11-11 22:03:57 +0000 UTC]
I hope so too, and I wish you luck for this.
It's the same look, like this 57 Plymouth Fury, which was buried about 50years ago, to dig it out in the future...you know what I mean?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yankeedog In reply to asaph70 [2009-09-13 09:24:15 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, it does have that feel. Keeping it like that, but in good running order would make it unique.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gibsart [2009-09-11 18:22:35 +0000 UTC]
This is great Don !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to gibsart [2009-09-11 18:53:59 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Martin!
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gibsart In reply to yankeedog [2009-09-12 11:15:14 +0000 UTC]
No worries Don.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
duraluminwolf [2009-09-11 12:34:52 +0000 UTC]
How did you manage to get the car into focus?
Do you know if this car is for sale?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to duraluminwolf [2009-09-11 15:34:57 +0000 UTC]
I drew a clipping path on the car itself, copied and pasted it onto it's own layer. Then I duplicated the background and blurred it with gaussian blur, copied that layer and pasted it into another document, but in grayscale, then copied that and pasted it back into the original photo, multiplied it over the background and lowered the opacity some till it looked right to me. It sort of gives the look of tiltshift photography.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
duraluminwolf In reply to yankeedog [2009-09-11 15:55:14 +0000 UTC]
I take it this was done in Photoshop? I've recently picked up using the path tool. It was all thanks to the book, "Commercial Photoshop with Bert Monroy".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to duraluminwolf [2009-09-11 16:59:04 +0000 UTC]
Yes, Photoshop CS2. That looks like an excellent book! Bert Monroy is top notch! Have you seen any of his work?
So much of my time is spent drawing clipping paths for work, every Heinz product or concept shot has to have a clipping path drawn around it to drop out the background, so I'm pretty skilled at drawing them.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
duraluminwolf In reply to yankeedog [2009-09-12 05:09:45 +0000 UTC]
I like to think I'm pretty skilled with Photoshop, myself. I think I have seen some examples of Bert Monroy's work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
duraluminwolf In reply to yankeedog [2009-09-14 18:04:59 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the link.
Mind you, I could learn to get to grips with Adobe Illustrator, myself. Apparently, vector files take up less space than normal PSD/JPEG files.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to duraluminwolf [2009-09-17 16:50:53 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome, he does some pretty cool stuff.
Adobe Illustrator is a different animal than Photoshop. I feel I'm a little more of an expert with Illustrator, but they keep changing things and adding new functions. Some of the new functions like blur and transparency... add to file size, but if you keep it basic, the files sizes in AI are much smaller than PS files, but it's really apples and oranges, AI is vector base and PS is pixel based.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
duraluminwolf In reply to yankeedog [2009-09-17 17:59:02 +0000 UTC]
So when you say "apples and oranges", you mean that no programme is better than the other?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to duraluminwolf [2009-09-18 01:48:46 +0000 UTC]
No, no they are both great programs, they just have different purposes.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AtholTheDestroyer [2009-09-11 09:08:06 +0000 UTC]
She looks rough but salvageable.
P.S. How did you make the photo it looks great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to AtholTheDestroyer [2009-09-11 12:46:41 +0000 UTC]
She's in good hands.
I drew a clipping path on the car itself, copied and pasted it onto it's own layer. Then I duplicated the background and blurred it with gaussian blur, copied that layer and pasted it into another document, but in grayscale, then copied that and pasted it back into the original photo, multiplied it over the background and lowered the opacity some till it looked right to me. On the car layer, I adjusted the saturation a little bit. I think that's pretty much it.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
D60433 [2009-09-10 22:39:55 +0000 UTC]
oh wow a real "bondo bomber" I haven't seen one of those in a long time.
great shot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yankeedog In reply to D60433 [2009-09-11 01:20:47 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Yeah, there's a lot of mud on her.
-YD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0