HOME | DD

yankeedog β€” PRR T1 6110 at Pittsburgh

Published: 2004-12-19 14:37:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 9691; Favourites: 90; Downloads: 122
Redirect to original
Description PRR Class T1 4-4-4-4 Duplex Locomotives were designed for fast passenger service on the Pennsylvania Railroad. The T1 had it all, the latest technology and Raymond Loewy streamlining. They were big, fast and powerful, but very unorthodox. Too much experimentation and the advent of the diesel electric locomotive, led to their downfall, but for a short time they ruled the rails!

Specifications of the T1 Locomotive:

Cylinders .......................................... 19 3/4" x 26"
Drivers ............................................................ 80"
Steam Pressure .......................................... 300 lbs
Grate ........................................................ 92 sq ft
Engine Weight ....................................... 502,200 lbs
Tractive Force .......................................... 65,000 lbs
Tender ............................................. Class 180-P-84
Capacity Water ........................................ 19,200 gal
Capacity Coal ......................................... 42 1/2 tons
Total Tender Loaded Weight ........................ 221 tons
Total Length of Engine and Tender .................... 122 ft
Maximum Speed ....................................... 120 mph+

Some T1 history:
The first two T1 locomotives were 6110, and 6111. Both locomotives were experimental and built to Pennsy specifications by Baldwin Locomotive Works ( BLW ) of Philadelphia Pennsylvania in 1942. They arrived just in time to help out with WWII traffic. They were so big that they could only operate west of Harrisburg. 6111 was unique in that it was equipped with a Franklin booster in its trailing truck. The Franklin Booster added an additional 13,500 lbs. of tractive effort, giving her a total tractive force of 78,500 lbs, no other T1's were built with boosters. In the spring of 1944, after logging 120,000 miles of road service, 6110 was sent to Juniata test plant in Altoona Pennsylvania for extensive testing. 6110 met or exceeded all expectations of the Pennsylvania Railroad engineering department and based on these satisfactory tests, the Pennsylvania Railroad ordered fifty more T1's! The new locomotives were built between 1945 and 1946. The Juniata shops built locomotives 5500-5524, plus all the coal and water tenders, while Baldwin built the remaining locomotives 5525-5549. There were some minor design changes to the appearance of these 50 locomotives, mostly for ease of maintenance, but they still retained the almost shark like appearance of the original two prototypes 6110, and 6111. The T1's marked the end of an era for the Pennsy, they were a last ditch effort to build a steam locomotive that could compete with the new diesel locomotives. Sadly it was all too little too late and the T1's were the last steam locomotives ever built by the Juniata Shops. With all their beauty, power and technology, the T1's were just no match for the efficiency of the Diesel electric locomotive. In the end T1s were just too big and complicated as well as too difficult to maintain. All T1's were eventually retired and scrapped.

My illustration shows T1 No. 6110 and a proud crew member at the 31st railroad yard in Pittsburgh, the bridge in the background is the 28th Street Bridge [link] that connects Liberty Avenue and the Strip District with Polish Hill.

Adobe Illustrator 8.0, Apple Macintosh G3 iMac, OS 9.2.
Related content
Comments: 58

yankeedog In reply to ??? [2019-02-04 10:54:03 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I know, I've done work for them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

YRT9401 In reply to yankeedog [2019-02-04 15:15:22 +0000 UTC]

Cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to YRT9401 [2019-02-07 12:59:02 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

YRT9401 In reply to yankeedog [2019-02-07 14:56:18 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rail-Brony-GXY [2016-06-21 14:52:16 +0000 UTC]

Plexi: Hey, it's me!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

UnexpectedSwede [2015-04-02 00:51:37 +0000 UTC]

Very, /very/ yes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to UnexpectedSwede [2015-04-08 16:10:45 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dinodanthetrainman [2012-11-08 17:34:42 +0000 UTC]

I like it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to dinodanthetrainman [2012-11-20 18:19:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dinodanthetrainman In reply to yankeedog [2012-11-20 18:21:35 +0000 UTC]

your welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

UKRail2001 In reply to dinodanthetrainman [2017-06-21 23:26:19 +0000 UTC]

Pretty controversial class isn't it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dinodanthetrainman In reply to UKRail2001 [2017-06-21 23:51:46 +0000 UTC]

I you are who I think you are I would link you to something but could not find it before and I don't think they wanted it shared. It is Probably in a Classic Trains magazine articles now.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

UKRail2001 In reply to dinodanthetrainman [2017-06-21 23:26:00 +0000 UTC]

Pretty controversial classΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GRIZZCUDDLYBEAR [2012-03-28 23:02:00 +0000 UTC]

Howdy Yankee,, I just wanted to let you know that the Person in the T-1 Photo is my Dad,,, I have the Original Photo of that Picture that You made of him, Looks Fantastic, and Thank You for Making the graphic photo of him.. His Name was Rich,, He was a Fireman on that Engine, Then later became an Engineer for the PRR and PENN CENTRAL AND CONRAIL, Sad that He passed away in January of 1980,, He Traveled many miles for all 3 railroads.. I am Glad that everyone likes the photo that You did,, Brings back alot of memories from the past,,

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

GRIZZLYBEAR59 In reply to GRIZZCUDDLYBEAR [2012-06-28 23:33:13 +0000 UTC]

Thank You, Yankee, My Dad had his heart in being a Railroader, He had lots of fun, and told uns kids alot of stories of his trips from Conway, Pa to Altoona and Back again,, He even showed me how to run an Engine at the Skully Yard West of Pittsburgh,, Many times I can still see him in those Engines roaring over the Tracks and seeing him come down to the Horseshoe Curve in Altoona, Pa,, He would Blow the Whistle from the Top untill he got to the Curve where alot of people waited an watxhed all the Trains,, Yes I can Hang my hat an Be Very proud of My Dad, He also wrote a few stories in the Magazine, Rails NorthEast, There You will find the Original Photo of the Picture standing next to that T-1 #6110, at the 28th street Yard in Pittsburgh, I hope you have a chance to read his story..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

yankeedog In reply to GRIZZCUDDLYBEAR [2012-04-08 20:25:07 +0000 UTC]

Wow! That is really cool! That sure is something that you can hang your hat on! Thanks you for sharing!
-YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

C-R-C [2012-01-01 07:00:22 +0000 UTC]

That's vector? Nice. I'll never get tired of that sharknose.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to C-R-C [2012-01-02 13:00:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!
Yeah, it's all vector art. IMO, the T1 was the most beautiful locomotive ever built, it's such a shame that at least one of them wasn't saved.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CNRU1fCSXC40 [2011-05-17 18:31:24 +0000 UTC]

Wait, there were 2 types of the T1?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to CNRU1fCSXC40 [2011-05-18 17:35:49 +0000 UTC]

The body on the original 2 prototypes was slightly different from the rest of the T-1s that went into production. 6110 had smoother lines, a different grill and a different placement of the keystone number plate. They also had portholes on the front sides. Buick later adopted The holes.
-YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CNRU1fCSXC40 In reply to yankeedog [2011-05-18 18:03:50 +0000 UTC]

Ohhhh, I see now, thanks YD.



- NS MainLine

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to CNRU1fCSXC40 [2011-05-19 00:54:06 +0000 UTC]

I don't know why they changed the design, but there were several years between the time the 2 prototypes were built and the 50 additional T1s were put into production. It's a shame that at least one of the prototype T1s and one of the final 50 weren't saved so we could marvel at them. I could never understand the Pennsy and why they saved what they saved and scrapped what they scrapped, but I seem to recall reading somewhere that the reason any steam locomotives were saved at all was because of some PRR employees hiding them away at the Northumberland Roundhouse.
-YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CNRU1fCSXC40 In reply to yankeedog [2011-05-19 01:01:59 +0000 UTC]

I would've loved for them to save this beautiful beast. HM, well, that did save some. They saved ALOT of GG1's and none of the T1's, I wish they saved the Q1 or Q2 as well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to CNRU1fCSXC40 [2011-05-19 13:37:21 +0000 UTC]

From what I understand, the Pennsy only saved locomotives that were deemed successful, by Pennsy standards and if you look at what they did saved, these were all successful, B6sa, D16sb, E6s, E7s, H10s, I1s, K4, L1s, M1b.
-YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CNRU1fCSXC40 In reply to yankeedog [2011-05-19 21:06:40 +0000 UTC]

Yep.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

250688 [2011-02-13 19:44:06 +0000 UTC]

A+ man but you missed heating surface in specs.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to 250688 [2011-02-15 11:17:37 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I really wish the Pennsy had saved one.
-YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Patriot1776 In reply to yankeedog [2015-09-04 21:10:12 +0000 UTC]

A trust called the Pennsy T-1 Trust, modeled after The A-1 Locomotive Trust of Great Britain, has been created with the goal of building a brand-new T-1 from scratch eventually. Β They are right now of course raising funds and doing loads of design studies of just how in the world they are going to do it with the country's currently available heavy industrial base, and selecting suitable firms to fabricate the parts and adapting current fabricating and machining methods in widespread use. Β CAD modelling will be a major, major help however since that of course means they can build the locomotive virtually many hundreds of times before pour iron for the first casting. Β Still though, will take several million dollars and so loads and loads of fundraising needed.Β 

Check here:Β prrt1steamlocomotivetrust.org/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jamesaragonastudios [2010-08-21 02:38:03 +0000 UTC]

This could had been a great locomotive for the Pennsylvania railroad museum. But It's scrapped sadly. Good question, do they have the blueprints for these locomotives?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to Jamesaragonastudios [2010-08-21 20:39:17 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it's a shame they didn't save her. I'm sure the Pennsylvania Railroad Technical & Historical Society has the blueprints, if they don't, the Altoona Railroaders Museum might or the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Archives in Harrisburg might have them. Want to build one?
-YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jamesaragonastudios In reply to yankeedog [2010-08-22 02:43:44 +0000 UTC]

If I had the money yes. I mean we could get a donation to recreate her. At least for display.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to Jamesaragonastudios [2010-08-22 03:41:16 +0000 UTC]

The Pennsy should have saved one of each class. I don't understand why they saved the locomotives that they saved and scrapped other more significant locomotives. I wonder how much it would cost to build a T1?
-YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jamesaragonastudios In reply to yankeedog [2010-08-26 17:30:11 +0000 UTC]

I don't really know, Is their places to built Steam Locomotives still around? But at least their are alot of Pennsy locomotives still around, New York Central has two left and Hudson is all gone I belive

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to Jamesaragonastudios [2010-08-27 00:45:25 +0000 UTC]

The Chinese still build them, I think the British built one recently from old plans. I don't know of any American builders. Steamtown in Scranton, PA can rebuild Steam Locomotives. You would think the with the technology available today, one could be built. I'm surprised that somebody hasn't done it yet. They build small live steam locomotives. [link]
-YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jconti [2008-10-30 20:22:33 +0000 UTC]

A real beaut. Hey, is that my Grand-pa?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to jconti [2008-10-31 10:00:05 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! It could well be. Did he work for the Pennsy in Pittsburgh?
-YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jconti In reply to yankeedog [2008-12-15 20:37:12 +0000 UTC]

Yep -- Pittsburgh and Youngstown O. from the 1920's or thereabouts through the 1970's.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

arracraidira [2005-09-01 06:27:40 +0000 UTC]

I forgot how much innovative streamlining the Pensy headed up, even if it was majorly lost with the advent of the war, and deisel mainliners around teh same time. The T1's were amazing... do you know if any at all survived to be museum pieces? Not many other steamers of the era were as cool, or as edgy... the rakish angles just floor me. I cant believe Id forgotten about them! You should really tackle a Dutchess-Coronation class loco next! With the streamlining they had for the 39' worlds fair.. not when they were stripped for war traffic. So cool.

Developments like these are lost on our generation. We dont have the grasp of how big these were in scale and undertaking, and what they meant to that world back then. We just cant. -crash

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to arracraidira [2006-12-15 14:56:14 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comments. Sorry for the long delay in replying to your comments. Sad to say, no T-1's were saved. It seems like such a waste not to have saved at least one. A valuable piece of railroad and industrial design history was lost when they scrapped the last T-1. Most were scrapped near here at the railroad scrap yard in Sharpsburg, Pennsylvania. Here's another illustration of the T-1: [link]

Thanks for pointing out the 4-6-2 Coronation Class, what a beautiful locomotive! I'd never seen one before. Check this out: [link]
I did a small illustration of a Gresly Class locomotive in my illustration Lucy in the Sky, here is a detail showing the locomotive: [link]
Thanks Again!
-YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tyhopho [2005-01-18 20:18:16 +0000 UTC]

an excellent piece don - and proof if ever that you need a print account!

my only crit would be that the guy in the centre looks like he is floating in the air - perhaps a quick shadow drawn in would help 'ground' him more

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to tyhopho [2005-01-19 21:45:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Brian! Man you have a good eye! There definately should be a shadow under him, I'll have to fix that. -YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AdRoiT-Designs [2004-12-24 00:35:46 +0000 UTC]

Great detail all over this is a great piece!!! Keep it up!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to AdRoiT-Designs [2004-12-24 02:25:54 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I'll try. -YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

camfella [2004-12-21 01:06:05 +0000 UTC]

Excellent work Don.
We have a museum close by that has old trains. I can never get over how BIG they are.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to camfella [2004-12-21 10:15:08 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Cam! They are massive machines. -YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hallucination [2004-12-20 20:57:39 +0000 UTC]

cool nice job on the gradients

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to hallucination [2004-12-20 21:10:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I never know when to stop with those things. -YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

toadsmoothy [2004-12-20 07:07:06 +0000 UTC]

great! i don't know shit about it but this one seems more painterly and less vector-y. hahaha...i dunno hahaha...i like it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yankeedog In reply to toadsmoothy [2004-12-20 21:09:31 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Tracy! I was trying to make it look like a painting that I did a few years ago that was based on the same photo. I guess I was successful! -YD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

toadsmoothy In reply to yankeedog [2004-12-21 03:49:09 +0000 UTC]

yep!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>