HOME | DD

YNot1989 — New Northwest v1

Published: 2011-03-13 23:22:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 3939; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 29
Redirect to original
Description I've been thinking a lot lately about Puerto Rican statehood, and have noticed that typically Republicans in Congress are the ones to oppose the measure. This is largely because if Puerto Rico became a state it would almost certainly give the Democrats 2 new Senators in fairly safe seats. So I thought, I know, lets just make a new state that would be more likely to vote Republican. The State of Lincoln sounded like a good idea, fair population, been trying to split from Western Washington and Idaho forever, works fine right? Well, sort of, the Idaho Panhandle actually has a a decent number of people and Idaho would loose a few seats in Congress for it, so what to do? How about merge the remainder of Idaho with Eastern Oregon, also a region that isn't very much attached to its current state. Oh wait... It doesn't matter if we give them just two new senators to cancel out Puerto Rico's two, the state would still give democrats 7 additional electoral votes (depending on how the electoral college reacts to the change) Well, I suppose we could merge Oregon and Washington's remainders into one state, dropping an additional two Senators. That sound fair?
Related content
Comments: 18

AlexFRD [2012-11-27 23:05:23 +0000 UTC]

Add it to the Florida State Line. Done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AngelBlue01 [2012-11-17 19:53:49 +0000 UTC]

As Puerto Rico has recently voted for statehood, we shall soon see if your proposal is brought up. Write your representatives, it is a great idea

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YNot1989 In reply to AngelBlue01 [2012-11-17 23:19:11 +0000 UTC]

I doubt it. Its looking like the Republicans might support it to swing a few Hispanic votes their way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TomBombardier [2012-01-13 14:17:40 +0000 UTC]

I see no reason to go around gerrymandering. As for Puerto Rico, they have never voted in favour of becoming a State.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SomethingSomethingMa [2011-11-28 05:19:45 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

YNot1989 In reply to SomethingSomethingMa [2011-11-28 05:44:27 +0000 UTC]

I think that's part of what might help bring them into the Union without this plan, they're leaning more right these days (like a lot of places that used to lean Democratic these days, and while there is a good reason for that I'm not gonna get into it). Jefferson would be the smallest State in the Union by Population, so I don't think it'd be a good idea to make it a state, Jeff Stone's California is Jerrymandering on a national level, and Baja Arizona would create a true border region which is always a bad idea.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Neoteros [2011-07-17 11:11:41 +0000 UTC]

Best Cascadia is independent Cascadia U_U lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JohnnyDart76 [2011-06-15 22:35:57 +0000 UTC]

Nice one, but might I suggest moving the borders of both Lincoln and Idaho east to the 120th parallel? It'd make Cascadia look better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YNot1989 In reply to JohnnyDart76 [2011-06-15 22:54:20 +0000 UTC]

Nah, the line goes pretty much down the eastern side of the Cascade Range, I think its fine as is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AngelBlue01 [2011-05-27 16:09:34 +0000 UTC]

Good idea, but I think California would split into northern and southern states, thinking that if Washington and Oregon get to merge/split Idaho then they should have the same right.

And there goes balance in the electoral college...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YNot1989 In reply to AngelBlue01 [2011-05-27 16:10:05 +0000 UTC]

I'm still working that out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mobius57 [2011-04-07 23:50:41 +0000 UTC]

Oregon!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YNot1989 In reply to Mobius57 [2011-04-08 00:09:06 +0000 UTC]

Oh come on Western Washington and Western Oregon (accept for maybe the southern half of western Oregon) are basically the same state.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dustfish [2011-03-14 00:03:21 +0000 UTC]

Whatever happened to letting the Puertoriquienos deciding for themselves what they wanted? (love the conceptial pacific northwest you have, as an Oergonian myself. But what about the preposed seperation of Nothern California into the state of Jefferson?)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YNot1989 In reply to Dustfish [2011-03-14 00:18:58 +0000 UTC]

The state of Jefferson would have a population of 400,000, even by the most generous proposals, it would be the smallest state by population. There are small cities with more people, and by that logic I doubt it will ever happen, personally I think this proposal (I first heard about expanding Idaho over Eastern Oregon in a book called Lost States) makes more sense because they'd all be reasonably large enough to justify statehood (Personally I still think Wyoming should be split between Utah, Colorado and Montana.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dustfish In reply to YNot1989 [2011-03-14 00:23:39 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... Hadn't thought about it population-wise, but you're right.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lamnay [2011-03-13 23:57:16 +0000 UTC]

I've been thinking about it too, the Virgin islands and Pacific territories make sense, they are pretty small. But in terms of population and area Puerto Rico is larger than several current states.

Every day delayed strengthens independence movements.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YNot1989 In reply to lamnay [2011-03-14 19:22:23 +0000 UTC]

Well, if and when we make Puerto Rico a state, it would make sense to bring the U.S. Virgin Islands in as part of the state since they're only 64 km from Puerto Rico itself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lamnay In reply to YNot1989 [2011-03-14 19:40:40 +0000 UTC]

Sounds good, though the Virgin islands and Puerto Rico both have rather different cultures, that's the main problem I see.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0