HOME | DD

Zepherus — The Schwalbe

Published: 2007-12-28 19:16:53 +0000 UTC; Views: 888; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 42
Redirect to original
Description I got this replica blueprint a few months ago and my mom had it framed soon after. It is a blueprint of a Messerschmitt Me 262 "Schwalbe" printed from microfiche. It is about 2ft by 3ft.

One of the cool things about it is that in the lower right hand corner is says that the blueprint is classified.
Related content
Comments: 42

Crypto-137 [2011-02-08 04:43:31 +0000 UTC]

What would I do to have such beautifull thing in ma room

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gustsav-mkIII [2010-06-29 12:08:34 +0000 UTC]

whoa! the very FIRST OPERATIONAL TURBOJET fighter!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RTJDudek [2008-05-05 06:13:09 +0000 UTC]

Cool, this plan shows all the details of Me-262.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to RTJDudek [2008-05-05 14:55:04 +0000 UTC]

It is big, and on my wall!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

slacking666 [2007-12-31 04:28:21 +0000 UTC]

the me 262 the first jet ever made

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to slacking666 [2007-12-31 17:33:14 +0000 UTC]

Complete awesomeness.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DaisukeUchine [2007-12-30 22:03:55 +0000 UTC]

Tis very odd, something with so much mass has the ability to fly. This comes to my mind when ever I see a plane. defenetly those jumbo jets.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to DaisukeUchine [2007-12-31 17:39:44 +0000 UTC]

Well, the military has made rocks like the C-130 fly and other like the F-4 fly faster than sound.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DaisukeUchine In reply to Zepherus [2008-01-01 01:13:45 +0000 UTC]

I know, that's what impresses me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to DaisukeUchine [2008-01-02 04:00:05 +0000 UTC]

Throw enough money at it and it will fly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DaisukeUchine In reply to Zepherus [2008-01-04 02:38:31 +0000 UTC]

-_-?

That makes no sence, but it was funny, and witty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to DaisukeUchine [2008-01-05 22:24:59 +0000 UTC]

lol. Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

focallength [2007-12-29 17:24:41 +0000 UTC]

The 262 you saw in the magazine was one of five built with Messerschmidt's blessing. They used the engines from Lear Jets for power. They actually handle pretty well. The planes were reverse engineered from some existing examples. One comment made was that now that they had good engines, they could see what the planes could really do. They were given sequential serial numbers and are considered new production aircraft.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to focallength [2007-12-29 17:39:53 +0000 UTC]

That is sweet, I didn't know that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-29 18:16:40 +0000 UTC]

I heard about it when I was a museum volunteer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to focallength [2007-12-29 18:29:06 +0000 UTC]

Cool, what kind of museum?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-29 23:46:11 +0000 UTC]

A local aviation museum.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to focallength [2007-12-30 02:17:16 +0000 UTC]

Cool. The nearest aviation museum is in Huntsville.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-30 02:35:06 +0000 UTC]

There's also one out in Reading, PA, about an hour from here. They've got a P-61 they're restoring.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to focallength [2007-12-30 06:01:31 +0000 UTC]

Oh, that is so not fair! Why are there no places like that down here???

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-30 11:45:21 +0000 UTC]

It was started by the guy who used to own the airport. He died in a plane crash (he crashed his F-86) and the volunteers took over. It's still there but if the state has its way and ups their rent, it won't be.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to focallength [2007-12-30 19:20:19 +0000 UTC]

That is terrible.... We need more independent museums.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-30 21:02:49 +0000 UTC]

It has to do with the state taking over the airport where the museum is located. They're trying to work something out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to focallength [2007-12-30 21:05:43 +0000 UTC]

I hope they get to keep it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-30 21:07:06 +0000 UTC]

It's still up in the air. There's a lot of local support so maybe something will be worked out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to focallength [2007-12-30 21:41:12 +0000 UTC]

That is good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-30 22:39:17 +0000 UTC]

We'll see what happens.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to focallength [2007-12-31 17:40:08 +0000 UTC]

I will keep my fingers crossed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-31 19:55:31 +0000 UTC]

It can't hurt.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ww2warbird [2007-12-28 22:03:04 +0000 UTC]

You know they've got one of these things flying here now right? New engines and all that jazz. I believe it's up in Washington state somewhere.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to ww2warbird [2007-12-28 22:08:20 +0000 UTC]

Sweet! I wish I could see it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ww2warbird In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-29 00:23:25 +0000 UTC]

It was in one of the warbird magazines, don't get me to lying about which one. Ya might be able to google video of the test flights. They made 'em start off the test flights with the gear down, just in case.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to ww2warbird [2007-12-29 01:09:45 +0000 UTC]

I think I've seen the pics of the test flight. I got annoyed with the fact the dear was down.... now I know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ww2warbird In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-29 16:25:10 +0000 UTC]

Yeah it was a safety thing. It helps keep the pilot from pushing the plane too hard before they know it'll handle it. It also gives the pilot a good idea of the lower speed handling characteristics.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to ww2warbird [2007-12-29 16:47:38 +0000 UTC]

I bet it was different.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ww2warbird In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-29 16:55:29 +0000 UTC]

I bet it was an eye opener. Those thing probably handle nasty at low speeds.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to ww2warbird [2007-12-29 17:24:40 +0000 UTC]

Just imagine if they got a Blitz bomber... that one is hard too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ww2warbird In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-29 19:39:23 +0000 UTC]

From what I understand, the Salamander wasn't an easy one either.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ww2warbird In reply to ww2warbird [2007-12-31 15:58:32 +0000 UTC]

I may have to give some of the Russian birds a go. I had to cut off the spin & stall to fly the Aircobra. I kept snapping into a spin & couldn't get out of it. My fault for trying to horse the plane into too tight of a turn I think.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zepherus In reply to ww2warbird [2007-12-29 21:44:15 +0000 UTC]

My expirience with the He 162 comes from Il-2, so I have no idea.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ww2warbird In reply to Zepherus [2007-12-29 22:02:36 +0000 UTC]

Except for a couple rounds with the 262 and the YP-80, I never fly the jets. Usually it's the B-25 or the 109 that I fly the most.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to ww2warbird [2007-12-30 02:21:52 +0000 UTC]

For me it is the Ta 183 and MiG 9, as far as prop planes it is the Seafire, LaGG 3, and the 109.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0