giorgiasiann In reply to trebory6 [2009-05-23 11:48:00 +0000 UTC]

aww thank you !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GiG-Lfc In reply to never-been-kissed [2010-02-14 01:33:38 +0000 UTC]

I like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

never-been-kissed In reply to GiG-Lfc [2010-02-14 14:42:06 +0000 UTC]

i can't believe im still getting flack for that or even that i'm still on the front page of her profile, i said those things more than two years ago...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GiG-Lfc In reply to never-been-kissed [2010-02-14 20:01:49 +0000 UTC]

gutted! shouldnt have write it lolz

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

never-been-kissed In reply to GiG-Lfc [2010-02-14 21:09:28 +0000 UTC]

gutted? what does that even mean? and why should i? i meant every word i said, and i still do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GiG-Lfc In reply to never-been-kissed [2010-02-14 21:19:31 +0000 UTC]

lol ok good for you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

giorgiasiann In reply to never-been-kissed [2008-10-23 17:13:21 +0000 UTC]

excuse me? im a stock photographer! im not just doing this to show off myself, its stuff for other people to make pictures of, seems its you who doesnt know your art. jeez!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

never-been-kissed In reply to giorgiasiann [2008-10-23 20:44:40 +0000 UTC]

stock photographer? i find that hard to believe seeing as all your photos have almost no variation. turning a quarter inch to the left in your mirror doesn't count as a new pose, sweetheart. if your a stock photographer, then im a saint.

if you want to prove me wrong, go right ahead. i'll be glad to see you grow as a young artist. but all i see now is a vain little girl. and it makes me sad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

giorgiasiann In reply to never-been-kissed [2008-10-24 23:35:03 +0000 UTC]

considering how bad all my stock is according to you, its a wonder how many people have used them...

also, a vain little girl? nice patronizing insult there, is there a point to all this or did you just want to victimise a 'little girl'?
art is subjective, but you're just plain malicious

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

never-been-kissed In reply to giorgiasiann [2008-10-25 13:07:56 +0000 UTC]

point? of course there's a point, i stated my point when i first commented on your work.
that DA is a place for serious artists, and the photo's you take seem to only chronicle how pretty you are.
and yes it was rude of me to post it directly to your page, i should have sent you a note, and be more private in my critique.
I apologize.

but if you think your work is up to par with all the rest of the stock photographers, then you are sorely mistaken.

i don't wish for this exchange to simply be each of us defending ourselves to the other's most recent accusations, so i'll make this last part brief, and if you want to reply, do so in a note.

1. patronizing? i apologize agian if you felt i was too harsh. i recognize that my first post was un-called for.
2. little girl? you are young, and your still learning. and i will tell you something else, when i was in art school i was called every name under the sun by one of my professors. he is now one of my closest friends and he is now my boss on an animated movie project. i understood that he was upset with my growth as an artist. which is my same problem with you.
3. subjectivity: there are dozens of highly regarded artists and writers and professors that are much more qualified to argue that point than i. so i'll leave that arguement with them. im not going to even touch upon that subject, becouse really, it confuses me and ive been to lectures promoting each standpoint.

i want you to know that had i not been in a shitty mood the other day, i never would have siad anything to you, your work just set me off. it was wrong of me to call you out that way. but now that i have -i won't take back my position- but i can say that it wasn't an intentional attack on you specificaly.

if you don't wish to reply in any way (note or otherwise) then i recommend a book on portrait photography, and you researching diffrent photographers who do well in that genre
(David Sacks, who is one of my favorites, Steve McCurry, you might have seen his famous national geographic photo, Annie Leibovitz, who takes a more contemporary approach you might enjoy, or even those DA members who specialize in fine art portraits, [link]
and
[link]

also, a word to the wise, stock photographers never work with the intention of makeing lesser art. when you first replied you made it seem as if being a stock photographer was an excuse, but if you look at the really popular stock artists, thier work is sometimes even more complicated and well shot, and more beautifully composed, than the work their stock is featured in. the best stock isn't really stock at all, its fine art that others are given limited permission to use.

im sorry for my mistreatment of you, i hope to see you make wonderfull art yourself, and if you do i promise to humbly congradulate and sa nothing further

sincerly
evelyn
-never-been-kissed-

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

giorgiasiann In reply to copypaster [2008-09-14 22:47:46 +0000 UTC]

do they?! sorry hah, i suppose i just always use the same angle

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

copypaster In reply to giorgiasiann [2008-09-15 22:23:23 +0000 UTC]

heh
do you hold out your camera as you take the shot or do you place it somewhere/let someone else hold it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

giorgiasiann In reply to copypaster [2008-09-15 22:48:11 +0000 UTC]

i holddd it! :'

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

giorgiasiann In reply to CkyGFX [2008-06-23 17:44:14 +0000 UTC]

aw thank you x

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CkyGFX In reply to giorgiasiann [2008-06-23 21:56:23 +0000 UTC]

Npppppppp

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

giorgiasiann In reply to joemaples [2008-06-16 23:04:06 +0000 UTC]

i'm even 5ft 9 so i could be a model but i'm honeslty not skinny enough or interesting looking! maybe one day, i hope xx

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

joemaples In reply to giorgiasiann [2008-06-20 15:53:51 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, sure. You're one of the most beautiful people I've ever seen. You have a very unique and haunting look. You should really give it some thought.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

giorgiasiann In reply to denizhayyam [2008-06-16 23:04:22 +0000 UTC]

aw thank youuu xx

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

denizhayyam In reply to giorgiasiann [2008-06-17 08:10:58 +0000 UTC]

u are wellcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

giorgiasiann In reply to spasmodiac [2008-05-25 12:58:53 +0000 UTC]

i look forward to seeing them x

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

spasmodiac In reply to giorgiasiann [2008-05-25 15:29:07 +0000 UTC]

[link]


^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

giorgiasiann In reply to Tenath [2008-05-25 13:00:17 +0000 UTC]

upload them to your deviant and i'll see them x

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

giorgiasiann In reply to Sex-Toy [2008-03-02 22:25:23 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

giorgiasiann In reply to L33T-Phoenix [2008-02-20 22:37:05 +0000 UTC]

no problemo feel free to use any in the future!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1