HOME | DD
CaciqueCaribe — He Didn't Like Obama's 'Transgender' Definition!
Published: 2016-05-27 04:37:59 +0000 UTC; Views: 465; Favourites: 4; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
For the record ...1) I am not talking those who have actually undergone procedures to alter/change their birth sex. So no need to revisit that point at all;
2) I am talking about people who are using the transgender cause to further their own predatory objectives*; and
3) I am talking about a president who has taken it upon himself to be a legislator and even an acting supreme justice and feels he can define for everyone what transgender is and who also feels that he can strong-arm individuals, businesses and even states into submitting to his personal opinion, regardless of how genuinely alarmed the public might be. This is not a "get over it" situation in the least.
*As for item 2, there are leaders of this open bathroom/locker-room policy push who are in fact known sex offenders, with arrest records and convictions. To say that parents shouldn't be seriously alarmed about this push is choosing a different reality than what so many rape and molestation arrest and conviction records show.
Here's one of those upstanding open bathroom/locker-room crusaders. There are many others known and many more who we will never known - until after another innocent life has been harmed:
sexoffender.ncsbi.gov/details.…
www.breitbart.com/big-governme…
The image was extracted from a WWII Soviet poster.
Related content
Comments: 16
I'm surprised how many feminists are all for this... If some creep really did come into their bathroom claiming to be transgender and then did something bad to them there, I can't see how it's pro-woman in any way to encourage that.
Obama's "guidance" that schools allow transgenders to use the bathroom of their choice or lose federal funding isn't REALLY a "guidance"... It's more of a royal command and an example of tyranny, which is precisely the thing this country's founders were most afraid of.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If I may be allowed to modify a quote from Pirates of the Caribbean ...
Obama's code is nothing but guidelines. He can't make real law and he sure as hell can's be allowed to interpret the constitutionality of anything, as if he was somehow a Supreme Court justice.
in 7 and a half years I have yet to see him do his job, which is to execute the laws passed by congress, specially the ones that have been clarified by the courts.
He's a thug. And it is obvious in the personal way he takes any challenge to his illegal edicts and in the way he retaliates against any dissenter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
He's sure found a lot of clever ways to go around Congress and stretch the wordings of laws to make them mean what he wants them to mean. I even wrote a journal on that subject: wertyla.deviantart.com/journal…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
His job is so simple but he doesn't like how restrictive it is.
He's the executor of the laws that are produced by Congress and specially those that have been throughly explained by the higher courts.
But he is an usurper. He feels that the executive branch supersedes the other two branches in power and authority and, furthermore, he feels that he can step in and take over their jobs whenever he feels like. He does not recognize our constitutional system of checks and balances.
Yep. Obama the Usurper.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Funny, my mother was just saying the same thing to me earlier, and predicts that some day, the executive branch will be so much more powerful than the other two branches that a president will be able to declare himself emperor and get away with it. My father disagrees, saying that there are enough patriots left in America, particularly in the military, that anyone who declared himself Emperor of America would immediately be shot. There could very well be a president who is emperor in all but name, I think...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I think I tend to agree with your Dad. I still have a little bit of hope that those in charge of our defense will come through and prevent a full takeover by the executive third.
For another example of thuggery by our beloved leader, just Google subpoenas against global warming skeptics. If you disagree with any of his edicts and definitions, he comes at you viciously. Of course, he only treats Americans in that way. He's just like a wife beater when it comes to America. Friendly to all outsiders and abusive at home (against the nation).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
global warming skeptic = the new heretic
They really do treat it more like a religion of some kind than science that's open to debate... and anyone who says "the science is settled" doesn't know how science works. They think it's the most important issue facing America today, even more important than terrorism (and some have even asserted that climate change is CAUSING terrorism, a statement that shows total ignorance of how terrorists actually think), and are willing to ruin the economy to advance their cause, although agreement that it IS a good cause isn't as widespread as they'd like. They might go further than ruining JUST the economy however... I had to read an article on Climate Change on a state test in school once and learned that scientists are actually proposing to BLOCK OUT THE SUN to stop this phenomenon... Isn't that OBVIOUSLY a bad idea?
I'm very surprised that Pope Francis has hopped on the Climate Change train, from what I hear. In at least one way, Global Warming Alarmism actually contradicts an important aspect of Christianity, in that the two have differing prophesies of how the world will end.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm okay with them believing whatever they want to believe, no matter how crazy it might look to me personally. But intimidating and coercing people into teaching a doctrine they don't believe in is just plain immoral and betrays what their motives really are.
Though they might openly say that they are more evolved than previous generations, and constantly cite examples of intolerance (real or perceived), they are only interested in inflicting reverse persecution. Their true motives become extremely evident once they happen to end up in any sort of position of authority or influence.
They have no interest in any form of mutual tolerance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
As with "reverse" racism, there's nothing "reverse" about "reverse persecution".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shouldn't be.
But whenever you say the words "racism", "discrimination" and "persecution" they claim that all those things are uni-directional.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Of course. That helps their claim to "victim status" and instantly makes the other side look evil. They either don't understand what these words mean or realize that purposefully misinterpreting them will help their agenda.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Twelve States are challenging Obama's definition and his mafia-like intimidation and retaliation tactics:
Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Utah ... thus far.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh... Are they also fighting to at least have private bathrooms?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No. In fact, some cities in Mississippi and Alabama have banned transgender people from using any public bathroom.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Which cities exactly?
Anyway, single user bathrooms are a no-brainer, and were never a no-brainer until the push to legislate it and expand the definitions.
As for those with more than one stall, again, it depends on whose definition of transgender you use. If you go by Obama's go into whatever bathroom you feel like definition, then you'll find that most people (usually parents) have issue with that. Item 2 above is the main reason.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0