HOME | DD

classictrains — Riding the Footboards by-nc-nd

Published: 2008-09-07 16:11:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 1557; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 46
Redirect to original
Description In a practice deemed unsafe and not even possible today, a switchman rides the footboards of an Chicago Great Western Alco S2 in the joint Soo/CGW Cicero yard just off the Eisenhower Expressway in 1967.
Related content
Comments: 17

eyepilot13 [2009-12-27 18:19:03 +0000 UTC]

Incredible yard shot! I enjoy trains especially in the urban-industrial environment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

factorone33 [2008-09-09 02:23:59 +0000 UTC]

Wow. I was hoping you had a shot of somebody actually DOING this. Now, you have to get us a shot of poling pockets in action.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

classictrains In reply to factorone33 [2008-09-10 00:02:07 +0000 UTC]

I know I don't have that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mikopol [2008-09-07 20:19:13 +0000 UTC]

For me it looks like a storage base of Santa Claus. Here are many Christmas packages

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HerrDrayer [2008-09-07 19:16:41 +0000 UTC]

Now the GCOR not only forbids footboards, it also forbids conductors from riding a car or engine to a joint. They must get off before the joint. That's no problem on the KCS, where they're still allowed to get on and off moving equipment (that's going less than 5 MPH), but it's a pain in the rear on the BNSF. There, they may ride the cut into the track, but they must stop the movement 50 feet short of the joint, get off, then make the joint. I can only imagine how many conductors fudge the rules when they have a lot of switches to make and just want to get it done and go home...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

samreevesphoto [2008-09-07 17:15:27 +0000 UTC]

Dang man. Footboard are highly illegal now. And it's an ALCO too for kicks. Great stuff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

factorone33 In reply to samreevesphoto [2008-09-09 02:23:23 +0000 UTC]

You sure? Looks kind of like a Baldwin, but I'm not the most well-versed of old-school switchers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

markkarvon [2008-09-07 17:10:02 +0000 UTC]

You're shots are always so interesting and well composed Chris. Have you ever thought of writing a book?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

classictrains In reply to markkarvon [2008-09-08 01:17:02 +0000 UTC]

P.S. When I get to 999 deviations and I get through more cleanup on some of my older shots... including tagging them with CC, date, and name... I'm gonna put together a CD/DVD with all of these pix on it. Not for profit... just for fun... interested?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to classictrains [2008-09-08 04:23:38 +0000 UTC]

Sure I'm interested. I've saved allot of your shots to the hard drive but it would be nice to have the whole collection on CD/DVD.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

classictrains In reply to markkarvon [2008-09-08 01:04:13 +0000 UTC]

You are reading my "book" as I write it... and folks like Hoyt and Traci and you many others are adding details that make it a wonderful compendium of memories. Don't know if it will ever get published on dead trees though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Stumm47 [2008-09-07 16:21:03 +0000 UTC]

Wow 1967 eh! Cool stuff. Would love to have seen a close up study centred on just the guy on the train too.
Also I quite like the frame you used on this one!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

classictrains In reply to Stumm47 [2008-09-07 16:59:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Larry. Unfortunately a closeup is impossible... too much grain in the film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to classictrains [2008-09-07 17:56:40 +0000 UTC]

Well, i had a little play with it, hope thats OK:
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

classictrains In reply to Stumm47 [2008-09-08 00:56:56 +0000 UTC]

That's the same resolution as the original, cropped more tightly. Here is what happens when you do a "closeup:" [link]

Where possible I try and include the surrounding detail. In some of my photos the "history" in the automobiles, buildings and freight car "billboards" are as intriguing as the locomotives themselves.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to classictrains [2008-09-08 09:11:29 +0000 UTC]

Yea i just cropped the image,adjusted levels a little,increased saturation and added a little USM.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TarryAGoat [2008-09-07 16:16:58 +0000 UTC]

Can't see why anyone would think that was unsafe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0