Comments: 47
PaladinArtea [2009-10-26 15:57:13 +0000 UTC]
sweet job
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wolfman-053 [2009-10-13 14:11:58 +0000 UTC]
Excellent work, Dave.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BellOrso [2009-10-13 08:23:39 +0000 UTC]
Real nice work there, man! My only cvrit would be that those two ship classes would be long out of service by the mid-2260's (which is when Vanguard was constructed), wouldn't they?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davemetlesits In reply to BellOrso [2009-10-13 18:13:08 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
No, these ships are 23rd century carriers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BellOrso In reply to davemetlesits [2009-10-14 10:44:52 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I had originally placed them a little earlier, but now I looked up their commission dates in the SFM. Based on those they mshould still be in service by the time Vanguard was constructed, albeit as support ships, complementing newer designs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
archefluxx [2009-10-13 06:15:30 +0000 UTC]
stunning!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GhostRider2007 [2009-10-13 04:36:31 +0000 UTC]
And you said that you're skills weren't up to par for something like this.
Very very nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GhostRider2007 In reply to davemetlesits [2009-10-14 00:07:45 +0000 UTC]
Very welcome...sure you don't want to try a station design of mine?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GhostRider2007 In reply to davemetlesits [2009-10-16 00:24:06 +0000 UTC]
Oh right....duh...it will be the SAIKAI MSD...I might load up the non-MSD version
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gopotter [2009-10-13 02:36:56 +0000 UTC]
Other than that, I forgot to say excellent job...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gopotter [2009-10-13 02:36:37 +0000 UTC]
... Imma start crying. Why haven't I seen the Macaroni? You take suggestions from other people, why not me?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davemetlesits In reply to gopotter [2009-10-13 18:15:29 +0000 UTC]
I'm sorry, but I'd never call a Trek ship Macaroni. Sorry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SiathLinux [2009-10-12 23:45:14 +0000 UTC]
Nicely done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
captshade [2009-10-12 23:18:23 +0000 UTC]
Really kewl.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bluedragon85 [2009-10-12 23:10:12 +0000 UTC]
omg!!!!! so kool!!!!! sweet!!!! kick ass!!!!! love it!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1