HOME | DD

RobCaswell — All Along The Watchtower

Published: 2011-04-26 01:49:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 9824; Favourites: 144; Downloads: 643
Redirect to original
Description I'm sure someone's used this title for this subject, before.

But now it's my turn!

And I'm too tired to come up with anything else...

Cool Watchtower station model by Dave Metlesits [link] , conversion by Wmwconnors. Connie by Aggi w/ conversion by Celticarchie. Scout/Destroyer by Lord Schtupp and reworked by Mr Tricorder. Freighter model by Richmerk [link] . Scout/Fighter by Kenny Mitchell. Background by Hameed [link] . DAZ Studio render.
Related content
Comments: 63

RobCaswell In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 17:02:08 +0000 UTC]

I've used that ship a few times in my gallery... often in the background, but there are one or two closer views. Just cruise through my Trek sub-gallery and I'm sure you'll run across it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DrOfDemonology [2012-12-06 01:00:06 +0000 UTC]

Awesmeness. Pure and total awesomeness

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to DrOfDemonology [2012-12-06 17:38:00 +0000 UTC]

I love doing those sorta "TOS slice of life" images.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AlexTownsend [2012-09-07 16:12:06 +0000 UTC]

Did you name this "All Along the Watchtower" because the song was used in the season 3 finale of Battlestar Galactica?
Either way, cool picture, very well made.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to AlexTownsend [2012-09-10 14:22:21 +0000 UTC]

Well it was named for the song, but not for Galactica's use of it. Probably more for Dylan's version, than anything else: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlexTownsend In reply to RobCaswell [2012-09-10 15:53:45 +0000 UTC]

Dylan's version was the first I ever heard (thanks to my father's love of all good music) but I prefer Hendrix's version.
Again, amazing job with this image.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jim197 [2012-03-29 09:31:19 +0000 UTC]

Nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Jim197 [2012-04-02 19:03:02 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PiconFleet [2011-06-26 10:36:59 +0000 UTC]

nice work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to PiconFleet [2011-06-26 15:23:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PiconFleet [2011-06-26 10:36:46 +0000 UTC]

nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DavidAkerson [2011-05-12 10:21:44 +0000 UTC]

Ah, Hendrix title, nice choice, but cliche!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to DavidAkerson [2011-05-12 14:38:30 +0000 UTC]

Worth all the two seconds I put into coming up with it, though!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Paudraic [2011-04-27 03:45:21 +0000 UTC]

Very cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Paudraic [2011-04-28 14:55:17 +0000 UTC]

THX!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SpaceCowboy5000 [2011-04-27 03:06:26 +0000 UTC]

Verah, verah nice. Hey, if the title works...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to SpaceCowboy5000 [2011-04-28 14:55:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hummakavuula [2011-04-26 20:41:51 +0000 UTC]

Awesomeness-ness...as always.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Hummakavuula [2011-04-28 14:54:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks bud! For the kind words AND the extra S's!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ptrope [2011-04-26 18:14:09 +0000 UTC]

Migawd! That enormous shuttle is going to crash into the main concourse! Run! Save yourselves! There's gonna be a tragedy!

What? Long lens? Oh ... sorry. Nice pic ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Hummakavuula In reply to Ptrope [2011-04-26 20:41:12 +0000 UTC]

lmao!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RobCaswell In reply to Ptrope [2011-04-26 18:26:43 +0000 UTC]

Oh you wacky card!

( suddenly had flashbacks to Airplane 2 and The Silver Streak.....)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thefirstfleet [2011-04-26 18:04:36 +0000 UTC]

My stuff mentioned under the name of a Jimi Hendrix song is probably the greatest honor I could get! Thank you very much, man!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to thefirstfleet [2011-04-26 18:27:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LmAnt [2011-04-26 11:12:29 +0000 UTC]

I'm sure I used this title before...just for a completely different subject
(and someone else used it before me for something totally different either...)
But still, I think your is unique enough
There are people behind these little windows again!
You know how much I love people behind little windows, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to LmAnt [2011-04-26 17:22:02 +0000 UTC]

It's surely not a unique title

And yes. Window Folk!
It keeps you from getting too distracted by the squirrels....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LmAnt In reply to RobCaswell [2011-04-26 20:01:18 +0000 UTC]

oh....there have been squirrels?
and i've missed them?
damn window people!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to LmAnt [2011-04-27 01:47:13 +0000 UTC]

Well... in all fairness there may have been some squirrels in the windows, too....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LmAnt In reply to RobCaswell [2011-04-27 07:17:05 +0000 UTC]

damn squirrels! distracting me from the window-people who distract me from them!
damn...
erm
...
*looks confused*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jetfreak-7 [2011-04-26 08:48:33 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful work, Dave's modeling skills really show quite well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Jetfreak-7 [2011-04-26 17:20:34 +0000 UTC]

Yup - uber nifty model. Wmwconnors really came through for me, as I couldn't get a good working conversion until now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pheenix42 [2011-04-26 08:21:47 +0000 UTC]

Reminds me of that very cool box art from a 60s/70s model kit!

"So let us not talk falsely now;
The hour's getting late!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Pheenix42 [2011-04-26 17:19:50 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, model box art and 70's paperbacks seem to have taken over my brain, of late.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Ptrope In reply to RobCaswell [2011-04-26 18:15:21 +0000 UTC]

Hey, there's an idea - would be cool to see this as the top of an AMT box .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Ptrope [2011-04-26 18:29:53 +0000 UTC]

Hmmmmmm!!!!!

(schemity-scheme-scheme....)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pheenix42 In reply to RobCaswell [2011-04-26 17:40:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kenham1 [2011-04-26 08:17:23 +0000 UTC]

Now THAT is a Starbase

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to kenham1 [2011-04-26 17:19:16 +0000 UTC]

I agree. Masao really nailed the Jeffries (retro TOS) look with this. Wicked neat!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kenham1 In reply to RobCaswell [2011-05-01 22:46:27 +0000 UTC]

Trek always blew it by not doing a TOS -set series with modern effects, talk about a blown opportunity

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to kenham1 [2011-05-03 19:45:51 +0000 UTC]

Well, sadly I think they regard what they did with the latest movie as just that. One thing that could be cool is Star Trek: The Computer Animated Series! Then we could have the old cast back, too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kenham1 In reply to RobCaswell [2011-05-03 20:34:59 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, that is a shame; especially since the new-Ent while is ok, doesnt really match the balanced lines of the original Connie. Its prob too late to try and lecture the writer types that the best and most exciting battles are *naval in look and feel (See ST II on how its done...) not dogfights...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Blades-123 [2011-04-26 07:27:14 +0000 UTC]

Beautifully detailed scene.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Blades-123 [2011-04-26 17:18:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I wish I had more (non Class I) ship types to throw in there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Magnaman1234 [2011-04-26 04:36:24 +0000 UTC]

I just hope it's not named this because it's the futuristic refuge for the Jehovah's Witnesses!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Magnaman1234 [2011-04-26 17:17:58 +0000 UTC]

I don't think they'd plunk down that many credits for a station this big if they expected the world to end, next year.... Better to just take all that dough and blow it on Wrigley's Pleasure Planet!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Magnaman1234 In reply to RobCaswell [2011-04-26 17:23:20 +0000 UTC]

Sure they would - if they figured that space station wasn't part of the world (which almost literally it wouldn't be) and therefore would be a safe haven toride out the apocalypse until the establishment of "Kingdom Come". Even in the Star Trek Universe, you have your lunatic fringe (the episode "The Way to Eden" proves this).
As for Wrigley's Pleasure Planet, I always wondered if that was created by the descendants of the Chewing Gum industry. I kept imaining that all the sexy babes there were twis because of those stupid commercials (double your pleasure, double your fun...)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Magnaman1234 [2011-04-26 17:49:00 +0000 UTC]

OoooOOOOo! TWINS!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Venomater [2011-04-26 03:13:42 +0000 UTC]

Nice station my friend. . . .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Venomater [2011-04-26 17:16:31 +0000 UTC]

Ain't it? I'm really happy with that model and will surely be playing with it more

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

warman546 [2011-04-26 03:02:56 +0000 UTC]

good name for picture

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>