Comments: 100
Jenny345 [2014-05-05 21:07:41 +0000 UTC]
Nice. No one wants to see your genitals or your boobs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MortuaryJoe [2012-09-15 23:22:42 +0000 UTC]
B-but, I don't have breasts. You forgot to mention that it is not an "artistic nude" if it is taken in front of the bathroom mirror.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eva-st-clare In reply to MortuaryJoe [2012-09-16 06:02:13 +0000 UTC]
what do breasts have to do with crotch pics...? XD
And you are right on that, although I guess I could imagine someone theoretically using that as some kind of concept for a photo project, if done with the right context... but thats another story lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MortuaryJoe In reply to eva-st-clare [2012-09-16 07:19:03 +0000 UTC]
Its socially acceptable for me to show off my man chest, so its not really an artistic nude photo with out me showing my goods.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BabylonSabby [2012-05-26 00:27:40 +0000 UTC]
Now, I DID see some vagina...and maybe the top half of the thighs shown on Deviantart...that looked pretty artistic. There were -other- things in the foreground and background that could've been counted as symbols. Or maybe it was surrealism for surrealism's sake. I don't know...but it was the FIRST and ONLY artistic seeming work with a vagina in it that I've seen that wasn't meant to be viewed as reference or porn. Most others not only include the lady parts, but the rest of the female body as well. And to be counted as 'artistic', usually those works have a specific target in mind. An audience who isn't looking for nudity to get off on it.
Otherwise, you have pornographic nudity who's target is obviously not that which is after anatomy lessons or something to reference.
That's not to say Playboy's not a bad idea...if you're trying to draw the female figure. Sure the boobs are normally horrendously huge, but some times you just gotta make due with what you have. And in some cases....it's porn.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wakerra [2011-12-04 18:33:06 +0000 UTC]
I know I've commented once on this before, but now I'm really riled. I keep finding art with topless girls that don't have a mature tag on it, and it seems every time I go to report it, I get a note back saying it was marked "invalid" and no action was taken. I don't know who to go to about this, and I certainly can't make a statement like this by myself. care to join me in finding others to make a stink to DA?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wakerra In reply to eva-st-clare [2011-12-05 00:43:00 +0000 UTC]
I know, that's why I'm so freaking ticked off. and its not like its hidden or anything, you can SEE IT IN PLAIN VIEW. this is the pic to most recent note I got back [link] its not in full, but there is enough there it should be tagged
what ticks me off is, I don't want to see nudity. that's why I have my filter ON. I don't care if its art or whatever, just don't let me see it! Take freaking responsibility and consideration and please tag your art if you're showing stuff like this. but apparently people get all sensitive when I politely ask them, or if I decide to go "anonymous" about it, the staff doesn't do squat
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jester-Mazoku [2011-11-04 21:13:41 +0000 UTC]
I agree with this. DA doesn't listen to us... their who nude discussion is only highlighting real nude art and does not show the crotch shots that are clearly not art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wakerra [2011-07-30 05:35:49 +0000 UTC]
crotches and oversized breasts. honestly, do people use their fetishes and pervy likes as an excuse to make "artistic nudes" or "expressions"? Oh, DA! why??
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shoyrabbit [2011-07-04 06:49:05 +0000 UTC]
This. So much.
This ends up being just a way to get insta-favs from all the creepers out there. No real effort or artistic ingenuity needed! 8D
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Karthesios [2011-04-28 05:39:06 +0000 UTC]
This stamp should be required reading.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MettagiriSuru [2011-04-28 02:42:28 +0000 UTC]
[link]
I hear this song everytime I see one of those pictures.
In fact, if I would LOVE to post that link on EVERY SINGLE TRASHY NUDEON THIS SITE, but then I would probably be reported for harassment.. I would say trolling, but I tohught harassment would be more appropriate given the situaition.
In fact, trashy nudes should be considered harassment. Because nobody wants to see them, and because "harassment to get out of the picture so it could have a chance to be artistic."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
eva-st-clare In reply to animenadie [2010-10-20 19:15:07 +0000 UTC]
Haha thanks. "Flesh Pocky" that's a keeper...
Yeah I don't know... I don't like seeming judgmental and whatever, but you have to draw a line somewhere. There's being tastefully erotic or artistically nude, and then there's stuff that has no purpose but as wank material (for either the subject or the viewer, I guess) and I don't think that's the purpose of this website. There are PLENTY of other sites where you can post stuff that isn't allowed here, and it will be welcomed with open arms. Why not wank there? I'm not saying it should be illegal or that they're horrible human beings, just that it DOESNT BELONG ON THIS PARTICULAR SITE.
My main issue is, if they're going to allow stuff like this, at least... have some standard for discriminating, or let people selectively block it or something. I don't mind seeing nudity in general but this IS NOT ART, it's like waking up in the morning and realizing someone's naked crotch is in your face. I'm not interested in peoples exhibitionism.
and yeah, the comments usually clinch it :/ It's generally pretty obvious whether some effort/thought has gone into something, or not. I stil think they should just make a section called 'DeviantCam' and everyone can post their lame self photos there. or whatever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
eskrotor [2010-08-15 21:56:06 +0000 UTC]
I thought the genitals were called "private parts" for a reason, why this obsession with making them public?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
crookedalley [2010-08-15 18:43:00 +0000 UTC]
I've seen so many of these stamps on dA that I want to make one saying: "A crotch-shot is the only TRUE art left in the world" with a picture of a censored vag or something.
I agree with the view, that crotch-shots aren't art(even though I don't particularly care if they're on here or not), but there's just so much incessant whining coming from a self-proclaimed "minority" that I want to slap you all in the face with that fact that your opinion actually is a rather popular one.
It's like people who say "pedophilia is bad" and then act like the rest of the world is a crazy bizarro place where everybody loves pedos, when in reality you could walk up to any average joe on the street(even a closet pedophile) and they'll describe how child molesters need to be publicly castrated in graphic detail.
It's just a senseless tactic to gain sympathy that isn't needed. That's why I claim to love everything that everyone hates, because they act like painfully obvious ignorance is the majority and don't even give their fellow humans credit.
Pretty sad when a misanthropic, nihilistic recluse like myself has to give humanitarian speeches, but that's how fucked up the concept of "rebellion" has gotten.
Good stamp, by the way. The graphic is hilarious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
crookedalley In reply to eva-st-clare [2010-08-16 04:38:35 +0000 UTC]
I said I wanted to slap you ALL in the face with reality, meaning everybody who assumes that they're the underdog when they're obviously not.
My whole issue had nothing to do with tacos and bananas, but the closed minds that they sometimes take over for.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eva-st-clare In reply to crookedalley [2010-08-16 04:51:35 +0000 UTC]
And you assumed that I assumed that... why?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crookedalley In reply to eva-st-clare [2010-08-16 04:58:16 +0000 UTC]
I didn't assume you assumed. I assumed that people who commented on here would be the same idiots I was ranting about and figured that your stamp was as good as any to serve as a soapbox for my opinions.
And what the hell is with that icon? It's creepin' me out, man! e_O
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eva-st-clare In reply to crookedalley [2010-08-16 05:07:43 +0000 UTC]
Ah... I see. Well I have no idea what mentality everyone else has, so I dunno.
Yukkureimu tells everyone to Take it Easy, or yukkuri shiteitte ne ( ゆっくりしていってね! ) Yukkuri are bouncy fat head things filled with sweet bean paste or other bun fillings.
They confuse people, so I like them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eva-st-clare In reply to crookedalley [2010-08-15 19:02:07 +0000 UTC]
Uh, I'm not 'rebelling' or trying to be kewl yoonieek minority or gain 'sympathy'. I'm just a little tired of losing my goddamned appetite every other day I log into this site. If I wanted to have penis shoved in my face I'd hang out on a porn site. The sheer prevalence os this useless crap has gotten to me.
I could really give a shit if my opinion is popular or not... and I don't really see the 'humanitarian' impulse in your comment, but maybe I'm too dumb to understand true wisdom as I'm too busy crying and being emo or whatever
Plus I wanted to draw a horrible mspaint looking picture of a crotch, isn't that enough reason?
Damn, take a pill or something, this wasn't a personal insult to all self-identified intelligent human beings.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crookedalley In reply to eva-st-clare [2010-08-15 19:14:29 +0000 UTC]
"If you don't like it, don't look at it." That's the response I got from Yaoi fangirls who did slash pairings like TedDrakness and GoDevilDante, and yet I still have to see Johnny C. getting buttfucked by Jimmy on a nearly daily basis, and I "don't have a right" to complain about it.
So don't give me that "it makes me sick" crap.
And I never claimed YOU were rebelling. I said I was tired of people treating their opinion like it's in the minority in order to set themselves up for an imagined underdog-style victory. As long as you admit that the majority would agree with this stamp, then none of my comment is directed at you. It's just a convenient soapbox for my beliefs.
As for the humanitarian lean, I was referring to the fact that people(especially people on dA) love the idea that "Everyone is an idiot but ME" and that it's counter-intuitive to actual progress and only promotes senseless discrimination.
Yes. That actually is enough of a reason. Of course, the same could be said of crotch-shot photographers, so...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
eva-st-clare In reply to crookedalley [2010-08-15 19:41:42 +0000 UTC]
Oh, and I'm perfectly happy to discriminate against people who think posting pictures of their penis/asshole/vagina online is a kewl thing to do. : D I don't want to know or associate with attention whores.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crookedalley In reply to eva-st-clare [2010-08-16 04:36:14 +0000 UTC]
Never said it was a bad thing. Discrimination is in our nature as animals. What's wrong is assuming that you're some kind of "lone warrior" on the subject, fighting against an oppressive majority when the reality is that most people tend to think exactly like you do on those same subjects. As I've said before, there have to be at least twenty "THAT isn't artistic nude" stamps on here, and most of them seem to treat their opinion like it's something that's constantly stepped on or overlooked when it isn't.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eva-st-clare In reply to crookedalley [2010-08-16 04:48:16 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I didn't make it because I think it is a speshul snowflake opinion, it was for lolz. I'm not sure why anyone would think i was trying to be OMG 3dgY or something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crookedalley In reply to eva-st-clare [2010-08-16 04:56:14 +0000 UTC]
Because that's how most people with a seemingly controversial opinion try to act, or at least present their opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crookedalley In reply to eva-st-clare [2010-08-16 11:04:07 +0000 UTC]
Then the comment isn't directed at you, but those who might come across this stamp who have that idea in their thick heads.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
eva-st-clare In reply to crookedalley [2010-08-15 19:28:21 +0000 UTC]
Except I can't not look at it, because when it shows up on my front page I can't conveniently unsee it. You have to actually click on a crappy yaoi picture to see anything, really. Same as I don't usually click on nude male photography or fetish stuff, or bad yaoi drawings, or inflation porn, or whatever. I'm not interested in looking closer. When it's just a gigantic dick on the page I can't avoid it, so yes it does make me lose my appetite then and there.
I don't think it's 'art' is the point, or that it belongs here, but I don't understand DA's guidelines so whatever, they can do what they want. I thought it wasn't a porn site but I guess I was wrong. This still isn't art and it's more obnoxious than some 12 year old's poorly drawn yaoi art that i can easily ignore (it also skirts the line of being against the rules) At least some of the bad anime art is bad in a funny way. Some dude's ugly penis, or shot of a girl's anus, only makes me feel ill.
I had a perfect example of what I'm talking about, but I can't find the page in my history and for understandable reasons I don't care to do a search on 'penis' to find the gallery again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crookedalley In reply to eva-st-clare [2010-08-16 04:32:41 +0000 UTC]
I have to see that shit on the front page sometimes as well. Usually, when I search "Invader Zim" that bitch's creepy child porn is one of the first pictures that shows up because it's so popular. I have to deal with it, keep brain bleach on hand, and move on quickly until I find what I'm looking for. The fact of the matter is, you're going to run into shit that pisses you off, and there's nothing you can do about it.
According to the rules, it isn't porn unless clear evidence of sexual arousal or stimulation is apparent. A limp dick might be disgusting, but as long as it isn't hard, dA is cool with it. Fucked up rules, but that's what they say. Just like you can ignore the slash, I can ignore the crotch shots. Different strokes for different folks, and all that cal.
I would rather you not provide a link. I see a dick every time I take my pants off, I don't need to see another one to get what you're saying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eva-st-clare In reply to crookedalley [2010-08-16 04:47:00 +0000 UTC]
OK, you can bitch about invader zim yaoi, I can bitch about penises. Fair enough?
If the rant wasn't assumed to be about my motivations then you could rant elsewhere to someone for whom it would be relevant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crookedalley In reply to eva-st-clare [2010-08-16 04:54:08 +0000 UTC]
I never said it wasn't fair. I was just pointing out that it won't change anything.
You were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. I was trolling, felt like starting a serious rant, and came upon your stamp.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eva-st-clare In reply to crookedalley [2010-08-16 05:03:48 +0000 UTC]
Of course it won't. But it sure feels good to complain!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crookedalley In reply to eva-st-clare [2010-08-16 11:03:09 +0000 UTC]
Indeed it does.
Furthermore, your icon whiplash disturbs me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dreams2remember [2010-08-15 14:38:04 +0000 UTC]
I think your wrong, artistic nudes never meant the model had to show there whole body. art is art and for you to limit your preception of art based on DA guidelines, I feel sorry for you, you cant really enjoy all forms and types of art. would you consider a scupture of a penis or a vagina is art?? if you do than whats the difference of a photo??
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eva-st-clare In reply to dreams2remember [2010-08-15 19:29:40 +0000 UTC]
Ah ok : D I had an example of what I'm talking about but I can't find it now, and it would probably be unpleasant for most people to look at (unless you have a fetish for looking at random bad pictures of a guy's ass and testicles)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dreams2remember In reply to eva-st-clare [2010-08-16 14:54:07 +0000 UTC]
I see LOL, well I hope you dont put me in the same catagory, I believe I make art, ummm but I show what you speak of in my photos O_O
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>