Comments: 69
napoletano [2009-08-05 18:56:47 +0000 UTC]
a 231 é muito legal !
o me ensina um dia a faze isso tmb
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Figuer In reply to napoletano [2009-08-05 20:31:05 +0000 UTC]
I am glad you like them, man.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Figuer In reply to YozenMari [2009-08-01 22:14:04 +0000 UTC]
I have invented stars enough to make at least 8 sets more. I should fold them with pretty paper to submit them.
Thanks for your comment, Ela.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
snowny [2009-04-25 10:39:56 +0000 UTC]
229, 230bis!!! They all pretty!! Can u make a tutorial for making a basic star??
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hippopottermiss In reply to Figuer [2009-03-15 21:43:29 +0000 UTC]
You said you don't like 231 so much but I like it for its depth and volume while remaining fairly simple looking.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Luzbella [2009-03-06 23:47:50 +0000 UTC]
Las 231!! Ambas, me fascina su centro! También la 233 y las 235! Estas dos últimas, en su centro, parecen un soporte para alguna joya o similar...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Figuer In reply to Luzbella [2009-03-09 09:05:57 +0000 UTC]
Yo últimamente no veo casi nada de tele.
Un par de series a la semana, las noticias mientras como, y poco más.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Luzbella In reply to Figuer [2009-03-11 00:11:34 +0000 UTC]
Oh, yo veo mucha tele cuando estoy preocupada... es efectiva para dejar de pensar tanto en cosas "importantes"... ^^U
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Figuer In reply to Luzbella [2009-03-11 20:26:13 +0000 UTC]
La verdad, es que se puede dejar el cerebro en modo piloto automático para ver la mayoría de los programas de la tele.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yannay [2009-03-06 23:33:05 +0000 UTC]
oooh! I rather like 226. It's only got 4 arms which makes it unique.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Figuer In reply to yannay [2009-03-06 23:37:06 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for your comment, Yan.
I could do more stars with 4 points, but I prefer to keep some self imposed rules in the design of the stars. This 226 was just an exception.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yannay In reply to Figuer [2009-03-07 00:08:58 +0000 UTC]
and exeptions are cool. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
xraiko In reply to Figuer [2009-03-07 22:56:30 +0000 UTC]
Ahh... I guess the ones you put the hardest effort into does turn out to be favourites amongst people. ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Figuer In reply to xraiko [2009-03-07 23:15:20 +0000 UTC]
It is not that, it is that the folding sequence is not so neat like in other models.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yaung27 [2009-03-05 01:00:40 +0000 UTC]
They're all so awesome!
But I'd have to sat 231 is the most intricate.
Great work man.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yaung27 In reply to Figuer [2009-03-05 22:23:27 +0000 UTC]
Bis, Mah bad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Goldfish-In-Space [2009-03-05 00:49:35 +0000 UTC]
233 is sure an interesting one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>