HOME | DD

Gouachevalier β€” Elective Monarchy: Rome

#italian #numanuma #roman #history #italy #kingarthur #latin #monarchy #montypython #montypythonandtheholygrail #rome #romulus #royalist #monarchist #monarchism
Published: 2017-07-21 13:07:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 3221; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Early Rome was not self-governing, and was ruled by a king (rex), whom possessed absolute power over the people. The senate was a weak oligarchy, whose main function was to carry out and administer the wishes of the king.

After Romulus, Rome’s first legendary king, Roman kings were elected by the people of Rome, sitting as a Curiate Assembly, who voted on the candidate that had been nominated by a chosen member of the senate called an interrex. Candidates for the throne could be chosen from any source. The people of Rome, sitting as the Curiate Assembly, could then either accept or reject the nominated candidate-king.

The election depicted above is that of Numa Pompilius (r. 716 BC – 672 BC), the first King of Rome elected in this manner.
Related content
Comments: 11

whatkop [2018-07-13 10:19:38 +0000 UTC]

[and in German]

Seriously, who was that English noble who got elected to be Holy Roman Emperor?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gouachevalier In reply to whatkop [2018-07-20 13:20:27 +0000 UTC]

Richard, Earl of Cornwall and second son of King John.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

whatkop In reply to Gouachevalier [2018-07-21 18:47:18 +0000 UTC]

Ah, that's him alright.
You know your stuff, don't you?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gouachevalier In reply to whatkop [2018-07-24 15:17:45 +0000 UTC]

I know how to use Google, anyway

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kyrtuck [2018-06-12 13:53:04 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, but later (and more famous) Rome was ruled by Emperors that required no election.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

menapia [2017-08-17 18:52:14 +0000 UTC]

Us Irish used to vote our kings into office also, the Tanaiste likewise was elected(sort of like an emergency spare if anything happened to the main guy). Β Any freeborn individual of the clan was notionally eligible if he had the clan name and was free of any blemishes or maiming

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gouachevalier In reply to menapia [2017-08-18 14:02:33 +0000 UTC]

I knew that the High King of Ireland wasn't a strictly hereditary position, but I didn't think that translated to the sub-kings also.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

menapia In reply to Gouachevalier [2017-08-18 21:40:20 +0000 UTC]

There could be some exceptions like the King of my native province of Leinster ~ Dermot MacMurrough became King largely because his brother died and suddenly there were hardly any other potential candidates, he sort of got the job by default.

Perhaps it would have been better off otherwise, Dermot is known a Dermot Na nGall(Dermot of the Foreigners), he hired Norman mercs to fight his Irish enemies, there's one description of him using the head of a dead enemy like a football and reputedly had one son of another enemy skinned, jointed and sent back to the rebelling father in a sack.

Some of these guys were tough S.O.B, elected or not.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DSegno92 [2017-07-21 13:12:40 +0000 UTC]

Numa Pompilius...Romulus direct successor

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gouachevalier In reply to DSegno92 [2017-07-25 11:13:33 +0000 UTC]

VREI SA PLECI DAR NU MA,Β NU MA IEI,
NU MA, NU MA IEI, NU MA, NU MA, NU MA IEI

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DSegno92 In reply to Gouachevalier [2017-07-25 11:57:44 +0000 UTC]

Can I take it as a good sign?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0