HOME | DD

hmhsbritannic β€” RMS Olympic and RMS Titanic by-nd

Published: 2013-01-07 21:01:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 28371; Favourites: 214; Downloads: 1658
Redirect to original
Description RMS Olympic and RMS Titanic coloured by me

Here is the original:[link]
Related content
Comments: 86

12e6teixnrsj [2023-08-22 13:02:59 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

12e6teixnrsj [2023-08-08 11:47:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

VorticalWorlds [2020-04-17 08:04:36 +0000 UTC]

Can we have a moment to think about the one sister who isn't here, the rms Britannic

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Darkdealer65 [2019-06-10 03:49:58 +0000 UTC]

it looks amazing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

1H8U [2019-06-02 00:57:24 +0000 UTC]

This was shortly after Olympics' collision with the HMS Hawke of which pushed Titanic's completion schedule back a few months as repairs needed to be done to her older sisters' starboard side quarter. As we see on Titanic the forward half of her A deck promenade has yet to be closed in.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nathancook0927 [2018-03-08 04:26:37 +0000 UTC]

It's a nice photo well done in color!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hmhsbritannic In reply to Nathancook0927 [2018-04-30 16:32:18 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FniaStories [2017-04-25 02:03:56 +0000 UTC]

Titanic: Left. Olympic: Right. I personally don't believe the switch theory

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goldprime111 In reply to FniaStories [2019-03-16 19:24:35 +0000 UTC]

Me neither. Why would they switch anyway?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FniaStories In reply to goldprime111 [2019-03-17 02:39:45 +0000 UTC]

I have no idea

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goldprime111 In reply to FniaStories [2019-03-17 14:00:28 +0000 UTC]

Some people say it was because of insurance

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FniaStories In reply to goldprime111 [2019-03-17 15:09:12 +0000 UTC]

Even back then? Still doesn't make sense

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goldprime111 In reply to FniaStories [2019-03-17 15:22:32 +0000 UTC]

Theories never make sense unless you have enough evidence to back it up

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FniaStories In reply to goldprime111 [2019-03-17 16:31:20 +0000 UTC]

Is there any?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goldprime111 In reply to FniaStories [2019-03-17 17:15:34 +0000 UTC]

Nope. If anything. There's evidence to debunk it. For instance, the promenade decks on the Titanic are enclosed, while they're open on the Olympic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FniaStories In reply to goldprime111 [2019-03-17 17:39:40 +0000 UTC]

Right, Titanic had that as well though in the beginning but got it later on before the switch supposedly happened

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goldprime111 In reply to FniaStories [2019-03-17 18:18:49 +0000 UTC]

But there's no proof OR motive of the switch

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FniaStories In reply to goldprime111 [2019-03-18 08:40:27 +0000 UTC]

Ah

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goldprime111 In reply to FniaStories [2019-03-18 14:00:51 +0000 UTC]

See? Nothing can prove this theory

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FniaStories In reply to goldprime111 [2019-03-18 21:56:15 +0000 UTC]

Yea

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goldprime111 In reply to FniaStories [2019-03-19 01:35:25 +0000 UTC]

But if you think that theory is nutty, wait till you hear the theory that the whole disaster was done for publicity

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FniaStories In reply to goldprime111 [2019-03-19 03:09:41 +0000 UTC]

I think I've heard about that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goldprime111 In reply to FniaStories [2019-03-19 13:33:33 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, then there's the one that it was a terrorist attack

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FniaStories In reply to goldprime111 [2019-03-19 14:10:25 +0000 UTC]

How? It was an iceberg

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goldprime111 In reply to FniaStories [2019-03-19 18:03:39 +0000 UTC]

Apparently it was rammed into the iceberg intentionally

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FniaStories In reply to goldprime111 [2019-03-19 22:02:13 +0000 UTC]

Oh please

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goldprime111 In reply to FniaStories [2019-03-19 23:39:08 +0000 UTC]

Look it up

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Boeing767 [2015-01-04 18:07:07 +0000 UTC]

Look at those two beauties! Two of the most beautiful ships ever built.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

sonicas6558f In reply to Boeing767 [2016-05-05 17:56:04 +0000 UTC]

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hmhsbritannic In reply to Boeing767 [2015-09-19 20:31:28 +0000 UTC]

Yes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HolyCross9 [2014-09-11 22:20:48 +0000 UTC]

That's so beautiful!!!! Β Thank you for coloring these photographs.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hmhsbritannic In reply to HolyCross9 [2014-09-16 19:04:50 +0000 UTC]

Thank you You're welcome ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nictrain123 [2014-08-21 21:14:27 +0000 UTC]

Magnificent job with the picture! Although, I find it odd that the Titanic dosen't have those promeade deck covers that distinguished her from Olympic. I remember seeing her launch photos with them covered, but why not here?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

KatesKat-moore In reply to Nictrain123 [2016-11-30 06:52:50 +0000 UTC]

Titanic didn't get her A Deck screens til about the last week in March 1912;;;this pic was taken earlier, when Olympic was back at Queen's Island to get a propellor blade replaced...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hmhsbritannic In reply to Nictrain123 [2014-09-16 19:05:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Viikkis In reply to Nictrain123 [2014-09-04 21:47:57 +0000 UTC]

Titanic didn't have promeade deck covers during launch. They were added later.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nictrain123 In reply to Viikkis [2014-09-06 03:04:14 +0000 UTC]

Oh okay then. Thanks for the inform.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KatesKat-moore In reply to Nictrain123 [2016-11-30 06:55:29 +0000 UTC]

if you see a launch photo with a screened in A Deck, check the stern...if there's a deck aft above the poop, you're looking at Britannic, which had the screens from the start

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

woodchopper21 [2014-03-02 00:49:23 +0000 UTC]

I am seeing double two Titanic's oh wait its Olympic they look alike

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Elven-Samurai [2013-09-27 04:11:07 +0000 UTC]

Awesome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hmhsbritannic In reply to Elven-Samurai [2013-09-27 21:18:36 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheHylianBatman [2013-09-25 00:46:53 +0000 UTC]

In color! Cool!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hmhsbritannic In reply to TheHylianBatman [2013-09-25 11:24:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alotef [2013-07-28 04:03:21 +0000 UTC]

C'est votreΒ colorisation? Impressionnant!

~Mike

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hmhsbritannic In reply to alotef [2013-07-28 07:02:56 +0000 UTC]

Yes, This my colorisation! Thank you very much!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CNMathias [2013-07-24 00:15:39 +0000 UTC]

great job


πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hmhsbritannic In reply to CNMathias [2013-07-24 00:29:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BobBricks101 [2013-07-22 14:03:05 +0000 UTC]

Does anyone know which is which? I've heard somewhere that the Titanic is the one on the right side.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hmhsbritannic In reply to BobBricks101 [2013-07-22 14:17:31 +0000 UTC]

Yes, the Titanic is on the right side.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BobBricks101 In reply to hmhsbritannic [2013-07-22 14:49:58 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I just looked the schematics up and the Titanic's superstructure windows are spaced farther apart.

Also, it seems you have forgotten to colour a the funnel on the tugboat (just a guess, I have no idea what the real ship is) below the Titanic. I'm not sure if it's really gray or not, but I still absolutely love this!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>